(04-03-2015 08:28 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 05:20 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

It was reupped a few months ago

How much?

(04-02-2015 11:58 AM)3rdWardCoog Wrote:  

(04-02-2015 10:37 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  Good for recruiting. Younger kids prefer UA to Nike. I hope ucf goes this route when our contract is up.

I have been in the UA corner for UH for a long time. I hope it happens.

Now football I agree UA is becoming the preferred outfitter. Basketball is by a landslide Nike.

Not even close.

http://louisvillesportslive.net/nike-vs-...-football/

Quote:Here is a breakdown of the power conferences – and Notre Dame – in regards of who makes their uniforms, beginning in the 2015-16 season. NOTE: Those schools not mentioned are Nike.

ACC: Boston College-Under Armour (UA), Georgia Tech-Russell Athletic, Louisville-adidas, Miami – adidas, NC State-adidas

Big 10: Indiana-adidas, Michigan-adidas, Nebraska-adidas, Wisconsin-adidas; Maryland-UA, Northwestern-UA,

Big 12: Kansas-adidas, Texas Tech-UA

Pac 12: Arizona State-adidas, UCLA-adidas, Utah-UA

SEC: Auburn-UA, Mississippi State-adidas, South Carolina-UA, Texas A&M-adidas

Independent: Notre Dame-UA

Nike outfits 44 of the 65 power conference schools for 68%

adidas outfits 12 of the 65 power conference schools for 18%

Under Armour outfits 8 of the 65 power conference schools for 12%

Russell Athletic outfits 1 of the 65 power conference schools for 2%

^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

(04-04-2015 02:45 PM)coogrfan Wrote:  

(04-02-2015 11:58 AM)3rdWardCoog Wrote:  

(04-02-2015 10:37 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  Good for recruiting. Younger kids prefer UA to Nike. I hope ucf goes this route when our contract is up.

I have been in the UA corner for UH for a long time. I hope it happens.

Now football I agree UA is becoming the preferred outfitter. Basketball is by a landslide Nike.

Not even close.

http://louisvillesportslive.net/nike-vs-...-football/

Quote:Here is a breakdown of the power conferences – and Notre Dame – in regards of who makes their uniforms, beginning in the 2015-16 season. NOTE: Those schools not mentioned are Nike.

ACC: Boston College-Under Armour (UA), Georgia Tech-Russell Athletic, Louisville-adidas, Miami – adidas, NC State-adidas

Big 10: Indiana-adidas, Michigan-adidas, Nebraska-adidas, Wisconsin-adidas; Maryland-UA, Northwestern-UA,

Big 12: Kansas-adidas, Texas Tech-UA

Pac 12: Arizona State-adidas, UCLA-adidas, Utah-UA

SEC: Auburn-UA, Mississippi State-adidas, South Carolina-UA, Texas A&M-adidas

Independent: Notre Dame-UA

Nike outfits 44 of the 65 power conference schools for 68%

adidas outfits 12 of the 65 power conference schools for 18%

Under Armour outfits 8 of the 65 power conference schools for 12%

Russell Athletic outfits 1 of the 65 power conference schools for 2%

That number goes up every year for UA though.

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I wear UA when I work out it's my favorite work out gear. I'm excited to have UC UA gear to work out in. Top notch gear/clothes.

(04-04-2015 02:00 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 08:28 PM)Knightbengal Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 05:20 PM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-03-2015 02:38 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  Navy is also Under Armour this year. I think they started last year?

Good news for ucf when our contract is set to expire with Nike. 60k students plus another legit player making offers.

It was reupped a few months ago

How much?

Not sure. Zack Lassiter was there in November. There were no details released

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

Those tourney unis though #smh

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

HA!

From an ECU fans perspective I like the UA a lot better than Nike. ECU has some of the funkiest/ugliest/weird looking gear I have ever seen and a lot of that is made by nike. I guess I like my stuff simple (similar to what the coaches and players get) and its almost impossible to find that for ECU

(04-04-2015 05:03 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

HA!

Those usf basketball uniforms look a bad version of 90's swim trunks.

(04-04-2015 01:36 PM)gostangs Wrote:  UA football equipment is junk. Most players won't wear their stuff. They are all marketing and no quality.

I agree actually. UA's stuff just seems 'cheap' to me. Once again, I know a lot of this is about the overall sponsored donation... But the product quality seems second tier to me. Especially basketball stuff. UnderArmor sneakers are an absolute joke.

(04-04-2015 05:03 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

HA!

(04-04-2015 11:14 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 01:36 PM)gostangs Wrote:  UA football equipment is junk. Most players won't wear their stuff. They are all marketing and no quality.

I agree actually. UA's stuff just seems 'cheap' to me. Once again, I know a lot of this is about the overall sponsored donation... But the product quality seems second tier to me. Especially basketball stuff. UnderArmor sneakers are an absolute joke.

Under Armour is garbage. Cheap is being nice. There is a reason that they have to pay a premium for a brand like UC to wear their stuff.

(04-04-2015 11:29 PM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 11:14 PM)invisiblehand Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 01:36 PM)gostangs Wrote:  UA football equipment is junk. Most players won't wear their stuff. They are all marketing and no quality.

I agree actually. UA's stuff just seems 'cheap' to me. Once again, I know a lot of this is about the overall sponsored donation... But the product quality seems second tier to me. Especially basketball stuff. UnderArmor sneakers are an absolute joke.

Under Armour is garbage. Cheap is being nice. There is a reason that they have to pay a premium for a brand like UC to wear their stuff.

Sorry you don't fit into their stuff I guess???

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

I actually kinda hated those at first but the team went nuts over them and now theyre a part of us. We pull out the "So.Flo" gear on Special occasions. Even the football gear now has an edition and from what I have heard, there may be a couple more variations too.
Its our own unique thing. Its part of the Caribbean/Cuban influence that the Tampa Bay area is known for and I like it.

(04-05-2015 10:50 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

I actually kinda hated those at first but the team went nuts over them and now theyre a part of us. We pull out the "So.Flo" gear on Special occasions. Even the football gear now has an edition and from what I have heard, there may be a couple more variations too.
Its our own unique thing. Its part of the Caribbean/Cuban influence that the Tampa Bay area is known for and I like it.

I hate to see what you wear in public if that uniform isn't a complete embarrassment to you.

(04-05-2015 11:00 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:50 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 02:47 PM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  ^Yes but who cares...the more important thing is how much your school gets.

I'd rather get $5mil/year from under armor (supposedly UC's deal) vs $800,00/yr from Nike. Nike treated UC (after the Jumpman stuff in hoops) like a minor partner. Adidas gave us preferential treatment and a lot more money. UA is taking it all to the next level for us. I don't care if we are the only UA rep at $5mil per year.

The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

I actually kinda hated those at first but the team went nuts over them and now theyre a part of us. We pull out the "So.Flo" gear on Special occasions. Even the football gear now has an edition and from what I have heard, there may be a couple more variations too.
Its our own unique thing. Its part of the Caribbean/Cuban influence that the Tampa Bay area is known for and I like it.

I hate to see what you wear in public if that uniform isn't a complete embarrassment to you.

and yet its a million times better then ever having to wear anything that says Knights.

(04-05-2015 06:37 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 11:00 AM)KNIGHTTIME Wrote:  

(04-05-2015 10:50 AM)mtmedlin Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 05:01 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  

(04-04-2015 03:51 PM)mtmedlin Wrote:  The really cool part for UC is that your gonna love the product too. USF has been with UA for quite some time and we've never had complaints. You guys got a massive deal if true. USF is still sitting around $2 million, given our Fball program is a baby in comparison. Our current deal isnt up for another 3-4 years I believe and if we can turn things back around Id expect that UA will take care of us. Theyve been a good partner thus far.

I just hope we don't get the 'Mello-Yello' shorts...

I actually kinda hated those at first but the team went nuts over them and now theyre a part of us. We pull out the "So.Flo" gear on Special occasions. Even the football gear now has an edition and from what I have heard, there may be a couple more variations too.
Its our own unique thing. Its part of the Caribbean/Cuban influence that the Tampa Bay area is known for and I like it.

I hate to see what you wear in public if that uniform isn't a complete embarrassment to you.

and yet its a million times better then ever having to wear anything that says Knights.

All UCF vs USF squabble aside, you can't be serious that is a good looking basketball uniform. The football uniform was fine (well as much as a ucf fan can say).