Well someone deleted it. Since we can't post women in yoga pants, men in tighties was a no-brainer.

(03-09-2015 03:23 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  Well someone deleted it. Since we can't post women in yoga pants, men in tighties was a no-brainer.

That "someone" wasn't gts.

The fact that Blah got away with his main sig for so long tanks your whole talking point.

The purpose of the gif was not sexual. But hey not my fault that a couple of conservative posters on here are scared that that picture might trigger homosexual thoughts.

You don't get a double standard, John. If I can't look at women in yoga pants on this site, I can't be forced to look at men in underwear. As I said, if you want to post it in babe of the day, you might have an argument to keep it there.

(03-09-2015 03:48 PM)EverRespect Wrote:  You don't get a double standard, John. If I can't look at women in yoga pants on this site, I can't be forced to look at men in underwear. As I said, if you want to post it in babe of the day, you might have an argument to keep it there.

Funny you say that, because this is being used as someone else's sig right now:



But go on about how "I might have a point if it was in BOD" or that you "can't look at women in yoga pants." But lastly please explain to me how a sig that wasn't a problem despite it being one of my longest used sigs since last Fall only became a problem when you raised a fuss about it?

LOL and of course that finally shuts up Ever Respect.

(03-09-2015 04:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  LOL and of course that finally shuts up Ever Respect.

That's probably because it doesn't offend anybody. Just admit you're a fudgepacker already.

(03-09-2015 04:24 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  

(03-09-2015 04:09 PM)john01992 Wrote:  LOL and of course that finally shuts up Ever Respect.

That's probably because it doesn't offend anybody. Just admit you're a fudgepacker already.

Kinda hilarious that the only moderator action being taken in this thread is over justin biebers underwear and not sh.it like this ^^^

I'll consider this thread your coming out party. It's about damn time.

(03-09-2015 04:45 PM)blunderbuss Wrote:  I'll consider this thread your coming out party. It's about damn time.

Just don't go hard on me buddy

What did I just read? LOL

(03-09-2015 06:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  What did I just read? LOL

The result of a hardcore con & a hardcore lib getting into an argument over Justin Bieber.

(03-09-2015 06:03 PM)john01992 Wrote:  

(03-09-2015 06:00 PM)HeartOfDixie Wrote:  What did I just read? LOL

The result of a hardcore con & a hardcore lib getting into an argument over Justin Bieber.

Now that is good WWE material right there.

Say it 10 times fast for even more fun.

(03-09-2015 11:05 AM)VA49er Wrote:  I have no idea why you guys are talking about male underwear models, but I'm pretty sure you all just reinforced my reasoning for NOT having signatures turned on.

I turned them off because an ECU poster over on the AAC board has a very annoying soccer sig.

(03-09-2015 07:32 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(03-09-2015 11:05 AM)VA49er Wrote:  I have no idea why you guys are talking about male underwear models, but I'm pretty sure you all just reinforced my reasoning for NOT having signatures turned on.

I turned them off because an ECU poster over on the AAC board has a very annoying soccer sig.

I turned sigs off a long time ago. Just easier to read the board without all that stuff taking up space, etc.