The replies here must be the result of "coordinating".

Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy. Again. Here is the deal.

1. Follow the AUP
2. DON'T BE AN ACEHOLE.
3. Pay attention to context.
4. Realize you don't have to comment on anything/everything.
5. When in doubt about being able to follow the first three rules...walk away from the site and go look at sexy stuff.

Friendly warnings about the above go on, a lot, behind the scenes and generally the person on the receiving end of that warning accepts it without much angst. But If ya'll like more public shaming, be careful what you wish for.....

And yes, confirmed: Too many of you act like a martyr when you've built your own cross.

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods ...

And yes, confirmed: Too many of you act like a martyr when you've built your own cross.

pot.kettle.black

https://play.google.com/store/apps/detai...rror&hl=en

lol @ Paul and gdunn

(03-06-2015 11:17 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  lol @ Paul and gdunn

What?

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy.

All avoidable.

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy. Again. Here is the deal.

1. Follow the AUP
2. DON'T BE AN ACEHOLE.
3. Pay attention to context.
4. Realize you don't have to comment on anything/everything.
5. When in doubt about being able to follow the first three rules...walk away from the site and go look at sexy stuff.

Friendly warnings about the above go on, a lot, behind the scenes and generally the person on the receiving end of that warning accepts it without much angst. But If ya'll like more public shaming, be careful what you wish for.....

And yes, confirmed: Too many of you act like a martyr when you've built your own cross.

LS, my issue isn't with the mods per say, I've vented frustrations to a couple. My frustrations are the hypersensitive posters, the ones that can dish it out, but damn sure can't take it.

(03-06-2015 11:19 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:17 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  lol @ Paul and gdunn

What?

Your tantrum was funny.

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy.

All avoidable.

Yah, follow the AUP and don't be a dick.

Your looking on the wrong side of the board if your looking for tantrums.

Seriously, we are happy to give and take. Deal with the ACEHOLES who only want to be giving and cry over the taking. Tell them to plug the blood.

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:19 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:17 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  lol @ Paul and gdunn

What?

Your tantrum was funny.

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy.

All avoidable.

Yah, follow the AUP and don't be a dick.

English is hard around here isn't it?

(03-06-2015 11:27 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:19 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:17 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  lol @ Paul and gdunn

What?

Your tantrum was funny.

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy.

All avoidable.

Yah, follow the AUP and don't be a dick.

English is hard around here isn't it?

que?

(03-06-2015 10:41 AM)Paul M Wrote:  And warnings and a short time out do not equal a lifetime ban for a completely, totally, unequivocally non offense.

So Paul...you have all the facts regarding the banning? I'm guessing you don't.

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:19 AM)gdunn Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:17 AM)JDTulane Wrote:  lol @ Paul and gdunn

What?

Your tantrum was funny.

(03-06-2015 11:20 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 11:08 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Kinda sad to see this turning into interrogating the mods on policy.

All avoidable.

Yah, follow the AUP and don't be a dick.

Tantrum? I've haven't thrown a tantrum. Look to your friend Mach for a tantrum.

I've put out there the way I see it. I HAVEN'T WROTE IT LIKE THIS!!!! or done 20-30 posts back to back to back, or created 10 threads.

Just because you're a mod on one of the other boards don't mean you can be a dick too sweetie.. I'll call you out here, I don't have to take it to a PM for you.

(03-06-2015 11:16 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  pot.kettle.black

Go on. I am curious to where you are going with this.....

gd. BOTH sides violate the AUP. Only one side asked for enforcement of it. But the side that was fine without it get our own special sticky at the top of the board and warned of nuke bans.

Shouldn't the other side be crying racism, misogyny, homophobia and discrimination about now? Demanding their own special sticky?

(03-06-2015 10:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Someone not striking from a boilerplate AUP what he CLAIMS to be against is telling. A libertarian would allow no such thing in his world. gd spying is gd spying.

If the need were to arise, law enforcement has power to go through them. A board owner has no reasonable need.

Paul, how do you know that?

(03-06-2015 11:32 AM)Paul M Wrote:  gd. BOTH sides violate the AUP. Only one side asked for enforcement of it. But the side that was fine without it get our own special sticky at the top of the board and warned of nuke bans.

Shouldn't the other side be crying racism, misogyny, homophobia and discrimination about now? Demanding their own special sticky?

Paul, how do you know this?

(03-06-2015 11:28 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 10:41 AM)Paul M Wrote:  And warnings and a short time out do not equal a lifetime ban for a completely, totally, unequivocally non offense.

So Paul...you have all the facts regarding the banning? I'm guessing you don't.

I know apparently you're super sensitive about a couple of things.

(03-06-2015 11:32 AM)Redwingtom Wrote:  

(03-06-2015 10:37 AM)Paul M Wrote:  Someone not striking from a boilerplate AUP what he CLAIMS to be against is telling. A libertarian would allow no such thing in his world. gd spying is gd spying.

If the need were to arise, law enforcement has power to go through them. A board owner has no reasonable need.

Paul, how do you know that?

I know that.