(03-02-2015 07:51 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:44 PM)ToldYa Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:36 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:23 PM)ToldYa Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:19 PM)Stammers Wrote:  No kidding.

LMAO.

Hahahahahhaha! You really know how to do tricks on a message board like that and cutting and pasting!

Good job mr stammers! We missed you on here. Looking forward to more of your intelligent posts.

Tell us more about why you think Josh is better than coach k.

Good idea to change the subject after your hilarious Antonio Barton comments. Nothing left and nothing to say. This is more your speed.

But but but mr stammers, you spent 100 posts saying players improved under pastner because they scored more points/game compared to a previous season with a different coach. You claimed to high heaven that is and was the case.

I'm just applying your logic to Antonio Barton. He scored more points/game at UT than under pastner.

Are you saying now your logic is flawed!?!? Oh please don't let that be the case mr stammers!!

Quote: You claimed to high heaven that is and was the case.

I stated that points per game were an obvious part of obvious improvement and referenced improved shooting percentages all the way around, and better stats per game/minute. The problem with you is that there is ZERO chance that you understand anything that is more complex than "Pastner sucks." That is the only reason you are here.

I can't believe I'm doing this, but let's see how you do with this stuff.

2009: EW, Mack, Sallie, Kemp, Spoon, Niles
96.6 minutes
28 points
4.8 assists
4.9 turnovers
40.3% field goal
56.8% free throw
32.5% 3 point
.29 points per minute
.98/1 assist to turnover

2010: EW, Mack, Sallie, Kemp, Spoon, Niles
166.2 minutes
64.0 points
13.1 assists
9.9 turnovers
44.6% field goal
73.4% free throw
39.0% 3 point
.39 points per minute
1.3/1 assist to turnover

You are comparing this to Barton; whose shooting percentage was the 2nd worst out of his 4 years, his 3 point shooting was the worst of his career, whose points went up 1.9 points per game and whose assists went up to 2.1 from 1.1 per game?

I will give you a chance to redeem yourself. Who showed more improvement, the 2010 group or Antonio Barton. Try and think really really hard and see what you can come up with.

THIS POST IS GOLD!!! I can't believe you wasted part of you re life doing it either. Haha!

#getaclue

(03-02-2015 07:08 PM)NJ1 Wrote:  let's not provoke one another, cool? Some of us here have a hard enough time being civil to one another as it is. The last thing we need is provocation.

You're right

(03-02-2015 04:05 PM)bigbob Wrote:  Jalen Kendrick. Kicked off.
Tariq Black. Benched at Kansas same as here
Kuran Iverson? Picked up by Rhode Island, really? He did himself in


Defect(ive) logic

And lest we forget our Big Dom.

I don't know where he might be now...says he's in search of another school.

http://www.sportingnews.com/ncaa-basketb...ec-memphis

(03-02-2015 08:24 PM)ToldYa Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 07:51 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:44 PM)ToldYa Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:36 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 06:23 PM)ToldYa Wrote:  Hahahahahhaha! You really know how to do tricks on a message board like that and cutting and pasting!

Good job mr stammers! We missed you on here. Looking forward to more of your intelligent posts.

Tell us more about why you think Josh is better than coach k.

Good idea to change the subject after your hilarious Antonio Barton comments. Nothing left and nothing to say. This is more your speed.

But but but mr stammers, you spent 100 posts saying players improved under pastner because they scored more points/game compared to a previous season with a different coach. You claimed to high heaven that is and was the case.

I'm just applying your logic to Antonio Barton. He scored more points/game at UT than under pastner.

Are you saying now your logic is flawed!?!? Oh please don't let that be the case mr stammers!!

Quote: You claimed to high heaven that is and was the case.

I stated that points per game were an obvious part of obvious improvement and referenced improved shooting percentages all the way around, and better stats per game/minute. The problem with you is that there is ZERO chance that you understand anything that is more complex than "Pastner sucks." That is the only reason you are here.

I can't believe I'm doing this, but let's see how you do with this stuff.

2009: EW, Mack, Sallie, Kemp, Spoon, Niles
96.6 minutes
28 points
4.8 assists
4.9 turnovers
40.3% field goal
56.8% free throw
32.5% 3 point
.29 points per minute
.98/1 assist to turnover

2010: EW, Mack, Sallie, Kemp, Spoon, Niles
166.2 minutes
64.0 points
13.1 assists
9.9 turnovers
44.6% field goal
73.4% free throw
39.0% 3 point
.39 points per minute
1.3/1 assist to turnover

You are comparing this to Barton; whose shooting percentage was the 2nd worst out of his 4 years, his 3 point shooting was the worst of his career, whose points went up 1.9 points per game and whose assists went up to 2.1 from 1.1 per game?

I will give you a chance to redeem yourself. Who showed more improvement, the 2010 group or Antonio Barton. Try and think really really hard and see what you can come up with.

THIS POST IS GOLD!!! I can't believe you wasted part of you re life doing it either. Haha!

#getaclue

It took 5 minutes; which is 4 minutes and 50 seconds longer than it usually takes to make a fool out of you.

I'm gonna let you in on a secret. But don't tell anyone else I told you, so sshhhhh....

I don't think Barton was better at Ut. I was mocking you to show you how stupid the premise was that you harped on and on about.

And then you proceed to write a thesis...haha. Oh dear.

#oldmanaintgotnocommonsense
#facepalm

(03-02-2015 10:55 PM)ToldYa Wrote:  I'm gonna let you in on a secret. But don't tell anyone else I told you, so sshhhhh....

I don't think Barton was better at Ut. I was mocking you to show you how stupid the premise was that you harped on and on about.

And then you proceed to write a thesis...haha. Oh dear.

#oldmanaintgotnocommonsense
#facepalm

Thesis? 3 clicks for all of the data. Your knowledge of what a thesis is; is about the same as your knowledge of anything more elaborate than "Pastner sucks." ZERO. That is the only reason you're here. One of your buddies was just shown the door for doing the exact same thing you are, so watch your step.

Buddy follows me around repeating the same crap, then continues to make more of a fool of himself. It took a few minutes; less than 5 actually. I can understand why you are so excited. It would have taken you 4 or 5 hours to put something like this together.

2009:
96.6 minutes per game
28.0 points

2010
166.2 minutes per game
64.0 points per game

2013 - Antonio Barton
5.6 points per game

2014 - Antonio Barton
7.5 points per game

That's the short answer buddy. Enjoy oblivion.

ROTFLMAO!

(03-02-2015 04:05 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 04:01 PM)bigbob Wrote:  Players defecting? Not the problem. Your logic needs "disinfecting".

Pastner bear Pitino TWICE last year; owned Gonzaga before this year. Travis Ford beaten last year.

How could a "clown" beat the ranked and defending national champion coach Pitino.

The only "clown" appears to be you

Interesting that a thread calling our coach a clown, in the title has been up for 2 days.

What's more interesting is that Bigbob has had an account since 2009 and never posted until the last week or so. And the other interesting thing is you don't seem to be bothered by it yet you jump every new poster that doesn't support your pro Pastner agenda. Is BigBob one of "your buddies"

(03-03-2015 01:24 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 04:05 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 04:01 PM)bigbob Wrote:  Players defecting? Not the problem. Your logic needs "disinfecting".

Pastner bear Pitino TWICE last year; owned Gonzaga before this year. Travis Ford beaten last year.

How could a "clown" beat the ranked and defending national champion coach Pitino.

The only "clown" appears to be you

Interesting that a thread calling our coach a clown, in the title has been up for 2 days.

What's more interesting is that Bigbob has had an account since 2009 and never posted until the last week or so. And the other interesting thing is you don't seem to be bothered by it yet you jump every new poster that doesn't support your pro Pastner agenda. Is BigBob one of "your buddies"

Quote: your pro Pastner agenda

I certainly don't have any pro Pastner agenda. I have been extremely critical of him this year and at the end of last year. This is one of your problems. You are so blinded by hate that you don't think straight and can't process very simple information. That is the difference between me and you. I have an open mind. You decided Day One that you hated Pastner and that was the end of it.

Why would anyone be bothered by one poster? The board is bothered by 40 of them, especially considering all of the good posters that left. Now almost half of them have gone and the board is already a little bit better than it was 3 days ago.

I will try to be a little more gentle with you. I know it's been a trying few days for you. I can tell by your posts in the last 12 hours that you are extremely upset. I won't use the bh expression out of respect.

(03-03-2015 01:24 PM)Brother Bluto Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 04:05 PM)Stammers Wrote:  

(03-02-2015 04:01 PM)bigbob Wrote:  Players defecting? Not the problem. Your logic needs "disinfecting".

Pastner bear Pitino TWICE last year; owned Gonzaga before this year. Travis Ford beaten last year.

How could a "clown" beat the ranked and defending national champion coach Pitino.

The only "clown" appears to be you

Interesting that a thread calling our coach a clown, in the title has been up for 2 days.

What's more interesting is that Bigbob has had an account since 2009 and never posted until the last week or so. And the other interesting thing is you don't seem to be bothered by it yet you jump every new poster that doesn't support your pro Pastner agenda. Is BigBob one of "your buddies"

Quote:What's more interesting

And I am 100% confident that one poster like Bigbob is much less of a nuisance to the board than 40 posters like the guys that just left, that pop up like weeds. Like clockwork 2 or 3 more of them will sign up this week. Wait and see.