Uconn women had an unbelievable following. Those girls were like celebrities.

(12-31-2014 04:39 PM)ncbeta Wrote:  Uconn women had an unbelievable following. Those girls were like celebrities.

The woman on ESPN3 said she met a bunch of them that were migrating to florida for the winter LOL

Well think about it if you are a young girl and are into sports the UConn women's basketball team is the most visible and televised women's team in college sports

USF 72 Memphis 39

U Conn keep your eyes on the Lady Green Wave Tulane this season. They are hot!

(12-31-2014 04:37 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  89-36 final attendance looked to be about 6000+

4,706 on the box score. Had the game been next week with students back at night, 7,500 to sell out crowd. We could had it closer, but just too many soft lazy passes. And that, against UConn you just can't do. Refs were soft on the fouls on UConn early, Coach Macey had to get in the refs faces about and an Asst. coach getting a T for it happen. After that it was much better. Even still we had no shot in the game. UConn is just on a level that only 3-5 other teams in the country can match. Though, with all the transfer we have this year playing together for the first time I want see how we do next year. Especially with the 6'7 girl we got coming in next year.

Zippy Khasoa 6'7, is from Kenya, we actually recruited her out of HS. But, NCAA didn't accept her grades out HS from Kenya. At Weatherford CC she has a 3.2 GPA.

She's averaging almost a double double in JC

Latest women's RPI
UConn 1
USF 30
Tulane 44
ECU 77
Memphis 181
Temple 183
SMU 190
UCF 193
Tulsa 234
Houston 248
UC 284
Those numbers will hurt ECU unless they can beat UConn,USF or Tulane and they are already 0-2
I see three bids at most

(01-01-2015 11:58 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Latest women's RPI
UConn 1
USF 30
Tulane 44
ECU 77
Memphis 181
Temple 183
SMU 190
UCF 193
Tulsa 234
Houston 248
UC 284
Those numbers will hurt ECU unless they can beat UConn,USF or Tulane and they are already 0-2
I see three bids at most

We've owned Tulane lately, and I thought before conference play that we would split with USF.

(01-01-2015 01:16 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  We've owned Tulane lately

Okay.

WBB scores listed in reverse chronological order…

2014 ECU 69, Tulane 65
2013 ECU 55, Tulane 52
2012 Tulane 67, ECU 51 C-USA Tournament
2012 Tulane 63, ECU 49
2011 Tulane 83, ECU 72 C-USA Tournament
2011 Tulane 71, ECU 61
2010 Tulane 73, ECU 64 C-USA Tournament
2010 Tulane 56, ECU 51
2009 Tulane 72, ECU 69
2008 Tulane 70, ECU 65
2007 ECU 76, Tulane 68
2006 Tulane 81, ECU 78
2005 Tulane 64, ECU 62
2004 ECU 65, Tulane 58
2003 Tulane 85, ECU 64
2002 Tulane 68, ECU 51

(01-01-2015 05:21 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 01:16 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  We've owned Tulane lately

Okay.

WBB scores listed in reverse chronological order…

2014 ECU 69, Tulane 65
2013 ECU 55, Tulane 52
2012 Tulane 67, ECU 51 C-USA Tournament
2012 Tulane 63, ECU 49
2011 Tulane 83, ECU 72 C-USA Tournament
2011 Tulane 71, ECU 61
2010 Tulane 73, ECU 64 C-USA Tournament
2010 Tulane 56, ECU 51
2009 Tulane 72, ECU 69
2008 Tulane 70, ECU 65
2007 ECU 76, Tulane 68
2006 Tulane 81, ECU 78
2005 Tulane 64, ECU 62
2004 ECU 65, Tulane 58
2003 Tulane 85, ECU 64
2002 Tulane 68, ECU 51

LOL lately like the last two years. 3 years ago nobody on our team today was here. 13 years ago has a lot of bearing on today

(01-01-2015 08:38 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 05:21 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 01:16 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  We've owned Tulane lately

Okay.

WBB scores listed in reverse chronological order…

2014 ECU 69, Tulane 65
2013 ECU 55, Tulane 52
2012 Tulane 67, ECU 51 C-USA Tournament
2012 Tulane 63, ECU 49
2011 Tulane 83, ECU 72 C-USA Tournament
2011 Tulane 71, ECU 61
2010 Tulane 73, ECU 64 C-USA Tournament
2010 Tulane 56, ECU 51
2009 Tulane 72, ECU 69
2008 Tulane 70, ECU 65
2007 ECU 76, Tulane 68
2006 Tulane 81, ECU 78
2005 Tulane 64, ECU 62
2004 ECU 65, Tulane 58
2003 Tulane 85, ECU 64
2002 Tulane 68, ECU 51

LOL lately like the last two years. 3 years ago nobody on our team today was here. 13 years ago has a lot of bearing on today

Classic!!!

(01-01-2015 09:22 PM)pablowow Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 08:38 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 05:21 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 01:16 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  We've owned Tulane lately

Okay.

WBB scores listed in reverse chronological order…

2014 ECU 69, Tulane 65
2013 ECU 55, Tulane 52
2012 Tulane 67, ECU 51 C-USA Tournament
2012 Tulane 63, ECU 49
2011 Tulane 83, ECU 72 C-USA Tournament
2011 Tulane 71, ECU 61
2010 Tulane 73, ECU 64 C-USA Tournament
2010 Tulane 56, ECU 51
2009 Tulane 72, ECU 69
2008 Tulane 70, ECU 65
2007 ECU 76, Tulane 68
2006 Tulane 81, ECU 78
2005 Tulane 64, ECU 62
2004 ECU 65, Tulane 58
2003 Tulane 85, ECU 64
2002 Tulane 68, ECU 51

LOL lately like the last two years. 3 years ago nobody on our team today was here. 13 years ago has a lot of bearing on today

Classic!!!

What do you consider relevant? The result of girls playing that aren't even on the team anymore?

Edit: I just looked. The last time Tulane beat ECU, there were two players currently playing for ECU. One who averages 14 minutes

(01-01-2015 09:25 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 09:22 PM)pablowow Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 08:38 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 05:21 PM)Native Georgian Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 01:16 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  We've owned Tulane lately

Okay.

WBB scores listed in reverse chronological order…

2014 ECU 69, Tulane 65
2013 ECU 55, Tulane 52
2012 Tulane 67, ECU 51 C-USA Tournament
2012 Tulane 63, ECU 49
2011 Tulane 83, ECU 72 C-USA Tournament
2011 Tulane 71, ECU 61
2010 Tulane 73, ECU 64 C-USA Tournament
2010 Tulane 56, ECU 51
2009 Tulane 72, ECU 69
2008 Tulane 70, ECU 65
2007 ECU 76, Tulane 68
2006 Tulane 81, ECU 78
2005 Tulane 64, ECU 62
2004 ECU 65, Tulane 58
2003 Tulane 85, ECU 64
2002 Tulane 68, ECU 51

LOL lately like the last two years. 3 years ago nobody on our team today was here. 13 years ago has a lot of bearing on today

Classic!!!

What do you consider relevant? The result of girls playing that aren't even on the team anymore?

Edit: I just looked. The last time Tulane beat ECU, there were two players currently playing for ECU. One who averages 14 minutes

ECU will need more than just splitting with Tulane and USF. So they really can't afford any more losses

(01-01-2015 09:25 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  What do you consider relevant? The result of girls playing that aren't even on the team anymore?

Edit: I just looked. The last time Tulane beat ECU, there were two players currently playing for ECU. One who averages 14 minutes

Regardless, 2 straight wins is not ownership (especially after being dominated the 10 prior years).

I see USF put a U Conn-like beat-down on Memphis. Big game coming up.

(01-02-2015 02:38 AM)DrBox Wrote:  

(01-01-2015 09:25 PM)DowdyPirate Wrote:  What do you consider relevant? The result of girls playing that aren't even on the team anymore?

Edit: I just looked. The last time Tulane beat ECU, there were two players currently playing for ECU. One who averages 14 minutes

Regardless, 2 straight wins is not ownership (especially after being dominated the 10 prior years).

I see USF put a U Conn-like beat-down on Memphis. Big game coming up.

But it's 1.000%!!

USF plays at Tulane tomorrow . Big game for both teams

ECU at Memphis today

Latest ESPN Bracketology (by Charlie Creme):

UCONN (1 seed)
USF (8 seed)

No Tulane

They should at least be on the bubble IMO.

(01-05-2015 08:00 PM)HuskyU Wrote:  Latest ESPN Bracketology (by Charlie Creme):

UCONN (1 seed)
USF (8 seed)

No Tulane

They should at least be on the bubble IMO.

They can climb in but they are going to have dominate the league outside of UConn and USF.

Their RPI dropped to the 70s after the loss and there is no one outside those two left in their schedule with RPIs lower than 75