Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
Author Message
Ramen_Tiger Offline
Banned

Posts: 5,382
Joined: May 2013
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #21
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
Memphis and Cincy to the Big 12. I am good with that.
12-16-2014 07:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
john01992 Offline
Former ESPNer still in recovery mode

Posts: 16,277
Joined: Jul 2013
I Root For: John0 out!!!!
Location: The Worst P5 Program
Post: #22
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
No...No...No...No

BCS/P5 status was never obtained via athletic success, but conference realignment. The ACC had to add FSU before they reached power level status. The Big East had Miami, Vtech, BC, Syracuse (when they were actually good), Pitt, & WVU to cement their status as a BCS conference.

retaining it in 2003 came down to two things.
The conference still retained a couple of brand name schools in Pitt, SU, & WVU. Plus the existing power conferences didn't want to take away BCS status because it would set a precedent that they could one day have their BCS status revoked.

The AAC never had the brand name schools & thus they were f***ed if a new system were to be implemented.
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2014 09:00 PM by john01992.)
12-16-2014 08:58 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #23
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
If UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa all started playing like they were 4 or 5 years ago, we'd be damn close to the ACC and B1G.
(This post was last modified: 12-16-2014 09:03 PM by UConn-SMU.)
12-16-2014 09:02 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCFKnight10 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 662
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 30
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #24
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-16-2014 09:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  If UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa all started playing like they were 4 or 5 years ago, we'd be damn close to the ACC and B1G.
If you ignore the fact that none of those schools were contenders for the national championship 4 or 5 years ago and the B1G and ACC each have a team that is competing...
12-16-2014 11:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
HuskyU Offline
Big East Overlord
*

Posts: 22,802
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1182
I Root For: UCONN
Location: The Big East
Post: #25
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-16-2014 11:16 PM)UCFKnight10 Wrote:  
(12-16-2014 09:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  If UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa all started playing like they were 4 or 5 years ago, we'd be damn close to the ACC and B1G.
If you ignore the fact that none of those schools were contenders for the national championship 4 or 5 years ago and the B1G and ACC each have a team that is competing...

I think what he was getting at is that the AAC would be a better overall conference. The ACC and the B1G have one great team each (better than anyone in the AAC), but it pretty much ends there. For P5 conferences, there is A LOT of mediocre at best.
12-16-2014 11:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TIGERCITY Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 19,905
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 437
I Root For: Memphis
Location:
Post: #26
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
Louisville was as good as it was in previous years and see where that got them.
12-16-2014 11:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UConn-SMU Offline
often wrong, never in doubt
*

Posts: 12,961
Joined: Sep 2011
Reputation: 373
I Root For: the AAC
Location: Fuzzy's Taco Shop
Post: #27
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-16-2014 11:16 PM)UCFKnight10 Wrote:  
(12-16-2014 09:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  If UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa all started playing like they were 4 or 5 years ago, we'd be damn close to the ACC and B1G.
If you ignore the fact that none of those schools were contenders for the national championship 4 or 5 years ago and the B1G and ACC each have a team that is competing...

B1G and ACC are top heavy. They have a bunch of dogs on the bottom.

You have to look at the conferences' average ranking.
12-17-2014 06:16 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
UCFKnight10 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 662
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation: 30
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #28
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-17-2014 06:16 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(12-16-2014 11:16 PM)UCFKnight10 Wrote:  
(12-16-2014 09:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  If UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa all started playing like they were 4 or 5 years ago, we'd be damn close to the ACC and B1G.
If you ignore the fact that none of those schools were contenders for the national championship 4 or 5 years ago and the B1G and ACC each have a team that is competing...

B1G and ACC are top heavy. They have a bunch of dogs on the bottom.

You have to look at the conferences' average ranking.
Why? Having a team competing for the championship is the only thing anyone cares about. We have no ranked teams. Even if UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa were all as good as 4-5 years ago then only Tulsa would be ranked and at around 24-25. That isn't good enough to be "damn close to the ACC and B1G." Let's not kid ourselves. There is a large gap between the G5 and the P5. ACC has 3 ranked, B1G has 4, AAC has 0. If the bottom of the league were better, we still wouldn't be close.
12-17-2014 10:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SublimeKnight Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,711
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 328
I Root For: UCF
Location: ATL
Post: #29
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-16-2014 03:21 PM)Stookey57 Wrote:  I think so

How "previous" are we talking for USF?
12-17-2014 10:12 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
dezagcoog Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,219
Joined: Feb 2013
Reputation: 20
I Root For: Coogs!
Location:
Post: #30
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-17-2014 10:08 AM)UCFKnight10 Wrote:  
(12-17-2014 06:16 AM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  
(12-16-2014 11:16 PM)UCFKnight10 Wrote:  
(12-16-2014 09:02 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  If UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa all started playing like they were 4 or 5 years ago, we'd be damn close to the ACC and B1G.
If you ignore the fact that none of those schools were contenders for the national championship 4 or 5 years ago and the B1G and ACC each have a team that is competing...

B1G and ACC are top heavy. They have a bunch of dogs on the bottom.

You have to look at the conferences' average ranking.
Why? Having a team competing for the championship is the only thing anyone cares about. We have no ranked teams. Even if UConn, USF, SMU, and Tulsa were all as good as 4-5 years ago then only Tulsa would be ranked and at around 24-25. That isn't good enough to be "damn close to the ACC and B1G." Let's not kid ourselves. There is a large gap between the G5 and the P5. ACC has 3 ranked, B1G has 4, AAC has 0. If the bottom of the league were better, we still wouldn't be close.

Yeah we would, because then the SOS of the top teams would be stronger and we would have ranked teams.
12-17-2014 10:13 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blunderbuss Offline
Banned

Posts: 19,649
Joined: Apr 2011
I Root For: ECU & the CSA
Location: Buzz City, NC
Post: #31
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
NO. If you think "Power status" has anything to do with what's happening on the field, you're stupid.
12-17-2014 10:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SublimeKnight Offline
All American
*

Posts: 3,711
Joined: Jan 2011
Reputation: 328
I Root For: UCF
Location: ATL
Post: #32
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-17-2014 10:27 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  NO. If you think "Power status" has anything to do with what's happening on the field, you're stupid.

Very true. On the field, with great OOC wins, the AAC could get that $4m bonus for getting the G5 slot. In the big picture, the AAC could go undefeated OOC against the P5 for 5 years, we're not getting those 5x payouts the P5 are getting for the playoffs.
12-17-2014 10:39 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Knights_of_UCF Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,980
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 88
I Root For: UCF
Location:
Post: #33
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
Did uconn or usf ever finish bowl season top 25? If not then no they'd make zero difference.
12-17-2014 12:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #34
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-17-2014 10:27 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  NO. If you think "Power status" has anything to do with what's happening on the field, you're stupid.

as the uconn poster showed their beast records showed they beat teams in power conferences, what i'm saying is if they were maintaining now what they did then duphus.
12-17-2014 12:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
No Bull Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 13,426
Joined: Jul 2008
Reputation: 820
I Root For: UCF
Location: Deadwood
Post: #35
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
If USF hires the right OC and finds a QB they will be a very good team next season. UConn appears to have a good coach but it may be 2 or three season before they are contending for a conference championship.
12-17-2014 01:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ECBrad Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,533
Joined: Apr 2014
Reputation: 57
I Root For: ECU
Location: Auckland, NZ
Post: #36
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
If UCONN and USF get their acts together then the East division is going to be ******* monstorous.
12-17-2014 01:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
BearcatMan Offline
Kicking Connoisseur/Occasional Man Crush
*

Posts: 24,154
Joined: Jan 2009
Reputation: 585
I Root For: Cincinnati
Location:
Post: #37
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
USF was great until they had to play teams not named West Virginia.
12-17-2014 03:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Stookey57 Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,652
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 142
I Root For: UConn, BC
Location: Boston
Post: #38
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-17-2014 03:27 PM)BearcatMan Wrote:  USF was great until they had to play teams not named West Virginia.
so true, uconn too. we beat them once and the year jasper howard died, we almost beat them.
12-17-2014 05:03 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
blunderbuss Offline
Banned

Posts: 19,649
Joined: Apr 2011
I Root For: ECU & the CSA
Location: Buzz City, NC
Post: #39
RE: If Uconn and Usf were Good as they were in previous years would the Aac be P6 status
(12-17-2014 12:43 PM)Stookey57 Wrote:  
(12-17-2014 10:27 AM)blunderbuss Wrote:  NO. If you think "Power status" has anything to do with what's happening on the field, you're stupid.

as the uconn poster showed their beast records showed they beat teams in power conferences, what i'm saying is if they were maintaining now what they did then duphus.

Yet, none of that makes a conference a "Power Conference". It's all based on big name brands, who has the most fans, who has the most political influence within the NCAA power structure, etc. All of this should be obvious by now.
12-17-2014 05:13 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.