* Bowl eligible

(10-25-2014 04:45 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  * Bowl eligible

Lets not give the Eagles any ideas, shall we?

(10-25-2014 04:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:45 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  * Bowl eligible

Lets not give the Eagles any ideas, shall we?

I merely report. You think this thread has potential?

(10-25-2014 04:48 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:45 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  * Bowl eligible

Lets not give the Eagles any ideas, shall we?

I merely report. You think this thread has potential?

The potential to spiral off into a debate about whether or not Karl Benson cheated us by not pairing GS against stAte and ULL, who is actually better, and whether or not the Eagles deserve a bowl? Yes.

But then again, every thread has that potential right now.

What does this have to do with going for linemens knees?

(10-25-2014 04:50 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:48 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:45 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  * Bowl eligible

Lets not give the Eagles any ideas, shall we?

I merely report. You think this thread has potential?

The potential to spiral off into a debate about whether or not Karl Benson cheated us by not pairing GS against stAte and ULL, who is actually better, and whether or not the Eagles deserve a bowl? Yes.

But then again, every thread has that potential right now.

You guys must really want to see some GSU posts. I almost bit.

(10-25-2014 04:50 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:48 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 04:45 PM)CajunFanatico Wrote:  * Bowl eligible

Lets not give the Eagles any ideas, shall we?

I merely report. You think this thread has potential?

The potential to spiral off into a debate about whether or not Karl Benson cheated us by not pairing GS against stAte and ULL, who is actually better, and whether or not the Eagles deserve a bowl? Yes.

But then again, every thread has that potential right now.

I had no idea such a thing could happen.

Meh. Lots of ball left to play. We are happy and will keep doing what we do.


Danny Gamboa's Casa de Autos!

Cool feeling.

Still plenty of ball to play.

Technically not bowl eligible

I went to ESPN, under Corrections (very bottom) and sent an email. See if they care if they're accurate, or not.

(10-25-2014 07:26 PM)CatMom Wrote:  I went to ESPN, under Corrections (very bottom) and sent an email. See if they care if they're accurate, or not.

Cat wet blanket Mom

(10-25-2014 07:26 PM)CatMom Wrote:  I went to ESPN, under Corrections (very bottom) and sent an email. See if they care if they're accurate, or not.

Tattle tail lol

Oh, don't worry because they don't care. They did the same with UTSA last year.

We qualify, but aren't eligible. *

(10-25-2014 07:26 PM)CatMom Wrote:  I went to ESPN, under Corrections (very bottom) and sent an email. See if they care if they're accurate, or not.

Now that makes me laugh. I know this statement may apply to all of us but, "You really need to get a life!"

Ga. So - still early, even if the wins come against our lowly conference, still impressive start. I really hope you guys can beat Navy later this year. That will help the conference reputation. Same for USA.

We just need to win out and let the chips fall where they may.

We are "bowl-eligible", because we could go to a game under the right (albeit unlikely) circumstances.

What's the story here?

The only people on here that could possibly have a beef about our schedule are are the folks that we don't play and even then they have to win out for it to be a valid point, and then ULL would still be SBC co-champs. For the rest of y'all if you don't want us to win the SBC beat us, it's that simple. Troy, TXST, and ULM have that opportunity, let's see how it goes from here. Who else doesn't play stAte and ULL? I don't hear any complaints there.