SMU has to be worst team in nation.

So why do we not have more sacks than we do?

(10-25-2014 12:53 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  SMU has to be worst team in nation.

So why do we not have more sacks than we do?

Because their offense is not nearly as bad as their defense.

(10-25-2014 12:53 PM)geosnooker2000 Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 12:16 PM)KendallC Wrote:  Our tacklers acting like the other team is covered in butter.

Or Ebola....

Well, technically, you're not wrong!

First half stats for TIGERS:129 rush yards, 238 pass yards, 16 first downs, 46 offensive plays.

The crowd shots look like miami vs cincy last week.

No sacks because MEMPHIS defense is horrendous.

23 yard completion by Lynch to start second half after pick by defense.

(10-25-2014 01:02 PM)boss man Wrote:  No sacks because MEMPHIS defense is horrendous.

23 yard completion by Lynch to start second half after pick by defense.

Avery has a sack. Third of the year.
Elliott looking good.

22 yard FG by Elliot. TIGERS extend lead to 34-7.

Crowd is poor but 0-6 will do that. Funny seeing a lot of fans sitting in shade of scoreboard. QB change for SMU. Tank ejected for targeting.

Bogus rule.

That's a crappy call against tank. That happens every other play.

Ricky hunter is fast. Great sack.

Bad luck right there. Tank had no intention of targetting. The runner just happened to be going down as tank was making a routine low tackle

technically correct call but MY GOD he hit the guy in his shoulder pads,

(10-25-2014 12:42 PM)Crazier Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 12:22 PM)MemTiger90 Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 12:15 PM)danny1 Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 12:09 PM)Titans3775 Wrote:  

(10-25-2014 12:08 PM)boss man Wrote:  Your crusade against all things Lynch are noted.

21-0.

That doesn't make him wrong.

But - he is wrong. Lynch is not perfect, but is growing and improving. He has the chance to be one of the best we have ever had. There is just no easing some of you "fans."

I don't mean any disrespect towards you, but if you see any more improvement in Lynch's future, then, well, I'm sorry. He's reached his potential. You can't fix bad vision. You CAN fix a QB's touch, but as for Lynch, he's had bad touch and thrown at people's feet for two years. It won't change. Don't get me wrong, he clearly isn't bad. He's average. But IF he's the starter his last two years, you will see the same Lynch then as you do now

He made a big jump from his freshman season to sophomore season.

Yep. It's called receivers catching the ball this year

(10-25-2014 01:08 PM)boss man Wrote:  Crowd is poor but 0-6 will do that. Funny seeing a lot of fans sitting in shade of scoreboard. QB change for SMU. Tank ejected for targeting.

Disqualified for playing football to hard, what garbage , he had no intent
to target it happened all at once !!! crazy call

WTH is up with the camera angle on every punt? It's zoomed in so far you can't see anything.

The announcers on TV seem to love SMU, this was also the case vs. Cincy. Anyone else feel this way or is it a Home team thing? Or am I just being a baby?

(10-25-2014 01:12 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:  technically correct call but MY GOD he hit the guy in his shoulder pads,

Yeah, that was a weird call. I'm not sure what the replay officials were looking at but every replay showed he didn't even make contact with the SMU player's head. He clearly hit him on the shoulder pads.

(10-25-2014 01:12 PM)WColt45 Wrote:  WTH is up with the camera angle on every punt? It's zoomed in so far you can't see anything.

ESPN having a "IDGAF" day when it comes to this game. Southern Miss graphic is also proof of that.