Doss with an interception!!

Next TD will be huge. Tulane's offense is currently being buried by penalties.

Lots of odd camera angles and lots of close ups. But I guess that's a good thing. It's a very intimate stadium.

These are flawed teams; it should be competitive.

(10-11-2014 08:00 PM)oliveandblue Wrote:  Next TD will be huge. Tulane's offense is currently being buried by penalties.

Penalties at the worst possible time.

UConn coughs the ball up routinely. Tulane just needs to hold on and eventually UConn will do itself in.

Picked his pocket!

For every good UCONN play there's at least 3 bad ones...ai yi yi...

Tulane up 7-3 at the half and that's how it should be. Both teams had one good drive.

UConn had two turnovers. Tulane had a ton of penalties.

The world awaits the second half.

Being relatively small, with two levels and a cover over the seating area, Yulman looks a little bit like an English Premier League soccer stadium.

I say that as a compliment ... it looks cool.

Aaaaaaaaaaaaaand here come the make-up calls!

(10-11-2014 08:37 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  Being relatively small, with two levels and a cover over the seating area, Yulman looks a little bit like an English Premier League soccer stadium.

I say that as a compliment ... it looks cool.

Many others have said that.

UConn shoots itself in the foot .... again.

Good 3rd down conversion then a fumble on the next play. That's the Husky offense I know!!!

UConn has three turnovers (Tulane has none), but it's still just 7-3.

That's UConn football.

What pisses me off is that first fumble was recovered out of bounds and these retarded replay officials refused to overturn the call on the field.

That's it! I'm done, I'm F***ING DONE!!!!!!! I refuse to watch another f***ing UCONN game until our head coach plays Tim Boyle for more than 3 plays! This after the ESPiN announcers finished telling me UCONN's HC wants to get Boyle "more reps". I guess in his language "more reps" means 3 plays!!!!!!!

The coaching staff has had it's head up its a$$ forever.

They resisted playing Cochran for so long when it was obvious he was our best QB since Orlovsky in 2004.

You give up just 12 points, you should win.

... not UConn.

(10-11-2014 09:28 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  The coaching staff has had it's head up its a$$ forever.

They resisted playing Cochran for so long when it was obvious he was our best QB since Orlovsky in 2004.

UCONN sucking this year was, IMO, a mild surprise. I thought they'd play better than they did. What has really pissed me off, is Diaco's stubborness in playing Boyle. I distinctly heard the announcers say that Diaco wanted to get Boyle "more reps". I didn't know 3 FREAKING snaps constituted "more reps"!!!

(10-11-2014 09:42 PM)DefCONNOne Wrote:  

(10-11-2014 09:28 PM)UConn-SMU Wrote:  The coaching staff has had it's head up its a$$ forever.

They resisted playing Cochran for so long when it was obvious he was our best QB since Orlovsky in 2004.

UCONN sucking this year was, IMO, a mild surprise. I thought they'd play better than they did. What has really pissed me off, is Diaco's stubborness in playing Boyle. I distinctly heard the announcers say that Diaco wanted to get Boyle "more reps". I didn't know 3 FREAKING snaps constituted "more reps"!!!

We can't score against air. I'd love to see Boyle in there.