Anyhow, I think this article really oversells the Big East's deal in being "unique" or "revelutionary". From what I can see, it's not either. It's certainly comprehensive, but it doesn't seem much different from deals that otehr conferences have had.
Specifically, the deal is remarkably similar to the last Big Ten deal. Under that deal (still in effect this season), every Big Ten conference game is broadcasted on some ESPN affiliate (ESPN/ESPN2/ESPN+/ESPNU/ESPN360) except for their games on CBS. A bunch of non-conferences games are also on the ESPN stations or CBS. Quite frankly, it's the
same deal as this "breakthrough" Big East one. The difference between the deal is merely the quantity of games in the BE one: well, duh, it's a 16 team conference; there's simply more games that can be broadcasted. Interestingly, the number of Big Ten basketball games on ESPN/ESPN2 is actually increasing next season with their new deal (from 25 games/season now to 43 games/season -- this is conference and non-conference). You can see the details
here.
From my cursory examination of the ACC, they seem to have pretty much the same deal, except their regional games are on Lincoln Financial/Jefferson Pilot instead of ESPN Plus. I guess that means they can't say "all out games are on ESPN's family of networks", but big deal. The Lincoln/Jefferson games are still available on Full Court.
What I'd really like to see is an analysis of things that really distinguish conference contracts. Namely:
1. Total number of games each on CBS, ESPN/ESPN2, ESPNU, ESPN+, and ESPN360. This would distinguish between accessable and widespread outlets (CBS/ESPN/ESPN2) versus poorly distributed (ESPNU/ESPN360) or local (ESPN+) ones.
2. Number of times each team is broadcasted on CBS/ESPN/ESPN2 -- to control for conference size to see exposure for teams.
3. Number of times the top conference teams are on CBS/ESPN/ESPN2 -- to compare how elite teams are getting exposure
4. Amount of revenue per team from the TV deal