(01-23-2015 06:16 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:08 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:02 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:00 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  Ignore him, he is merely trolling. It is obvious his argument is a complete logical fallacy.

Are you really so illogical and insipid that you would deny that Baylor gave away the game?

You must realize there's a reason why no non Big Ten team fans are siding with you right?

Who cares who "sides" with whom? Everyone with more than 10 brain cells knows Baylor gave the game away. If that receiver doesn't get flagged for a completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is over, Michigan State loses.

It's that simple.

And funny, but the only ones I see arguing the point are Iowa, Illinois, and MSU fans.

Yeah, well you don't even have any "actual" SEC fans supporting your biased claim.

Your dumb brain thinks it "biased" to say a team that (a) led by 20 points in the 4th quarter, (b) had a pick-6 that would have made the score 48-28 with 10 minutes left negated by a "block in the back" penalty on a player FAR from the LB who was returning the ball for a Baylor TD, and © had a offensive face mask call negate a game-winning catch with 2 minutes left did not totally blow the game?

What kind of weirdo-biased B1G fan are you?

(01-23-2015 06:18 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:16 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:08 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:02 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  Are you really so illogical and insipid that you would deny that Baylor gave away the game?

You must realize there's a reason why no non Big Ten team fans are siding with you right?

Who cares who "sides" with whom? Everyone with more than 10 brain cells knows Baylor gave the game away. If that receiver doesn't get flagged for a completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is over, Michigan State loses.

It's that simple.

And funny, but the only ones I see arguing the point are Iowa, Illinois, and MSU fans.

Yeah, well you don't even have any "actual" SEC fans supporting your biased claim.

Your dumb brain thinks it "biased" to say a team that (a) led by 20 points in the 4th quarter, (b) had a pick-6 that would have made the score 48-28 with 10 minutes left negated by a "block in the back" penalty on a player FAR from the LB who was returning the ball for a Baylor TD, and © had a offensive face mask call negate a game-winning catch with 2 minutes left did not totally blow the game?

What kind of weirdo-biased B1G fan are you?

The kind that has others agreeing with me. I just keep laughing because of how hard you try to explain how a loss means a win and how a win means a loss. You are so funny, keep it up, this is fun.

What's funny about Michigan State is they allegedly had a "great defense", but in the three games against top teams - Oregon, Ohio State, and Baylor - their "great defense" got absolutely demolished, giving up 500+ yards and 40+ points.

(01-23-2015 06:22 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:18 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:16 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:08 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  You must realize there's a reason why no non Big Ten team fans are siding with you right?

Who cares who "sides" with whom? Everyone with more than 10 brain cells knows Baylor gave the game away. If that receiver doesn't get flagged for a completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is over, Michigan State loses.

It's that simple.

And funny, but the only ones I see arguing the point are Iowa, Illinois, and MSU fans.

Yeah, well you don't even have any "actual" SEC fans supporting your biased claim.

Your dumb brain thinks it "biased" to say a team that (a) led by 20 points in the 4th quarter, (b) had a pick-6 that would have made the score 48-28 with 10 minutes left negated by a "block in the back" penalty on a player FAR from the LB who was returning the ball for a Baylor TD, and © had a offensive face mask call negate a game-winning catch with 2 minutes left did not totally blow the game?

What kind of weirdo-biased B1G fan are you?

The kind that has others agreeing with me.

You mean other warped-biased B1G fans?

PS - if you even had 5 brain cells, you'd know I never said MSU didn't win the game. They obviously did. They were just extraordinarily lucky and fortunate to win. Nobody can deny that and have any credibility.

(01-23-2015 06:32 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:22 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:18 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:16 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  Who cares who "sides" with whom? Everyone with more than 10 brain cells knows Baylor gave the game away. If that receiver doesn't get flagged for a completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is over, Michigan State loses.

It's that simple.

And funny, but the only ones I see arguing the point are Iowa, Illinois, and MSU fans.

Yeah, well you don't even have any "actual" SEC fans supporting your biased claim.

Your dumb brain thinks it "biased" to say a team that (a) led by 20 points in the 4th quarter, (b) had a pick-6 that would have made the score 48-28 with 10 minutes left negated by a "block in the back" penalty on a player FAR from the LB who was returning the ball for a Baylor TD, and © had a offensive face mask call negate a game-winning catch with 2 minutes left did not totally blow the game?

What kind of weirdo-biased B1G fan are you?

The kind that has others agreeing with me.

You mean other B1G fans that for years now have had the chance to watch true bias in the form of SEC love?

Yes.

(01-23-2015 06:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:08 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:02 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:00 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 11:45 AM)dbackjon Wrote:  Baylor took advantage of early Spartan mistakes, before MSU reasserted themselves. MSU almost blew the game, but in the end, the better team won.


Football is a 60 minute game. Points scored in the last five minutes count just as much as points scored in the first five minutes.

To think otherwise shows you know little about football.

Ignore him, he is merely trolling. It is obvious his argument is a complete logical fallacy.

Are you really so illogical and insipid that you would deny that Baylor gave away the game?

You must realize there's a reason why no non Big Ten team fans are siding with you right?

Who cares who "sides" with whom? Everyone with more than 10 brain cells knows Baylor gave the game away. If that receiver doesn't get flagged for a completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is over, Michigan State loses.

It's that simple.

And funny, but the only ones I see arguing the point are Iowa, Illinois, and MSU fans.

Michigan State came back and put 21 points on the board to win it, it wasn't like Baylor fumbled with a 2 point lead with a minute to go, Michigan State finished out the game strong and had to take advantage of Baylors mistakes. Still had to go down the field and win it, they didn't just luck out. Did you watch the game?

By the way Quo, the 3 drives Michigan State scored on were 71, 60, and 81 yards. That isn't Baylor giving the game away, giving the game away is having turnovers in your own redzone or even own 50. Baylor lost in what was essentially a home game.

(01-23-2015 06:31 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  What's funny about Michigan State is they allegedly had a "great defense", but in the three games against top teams - Oregon, Ohio State, and Baylor - their "great defense" got absolutely demolished, giving up 500+ yards and 40+ points.

They had a great defense in 2013, but not in 2014.

(01-23-2015 07:34 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:32 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:22 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:18 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:16 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  Yeah, well you don't even have any "actual" SEC fans supporting your biased claim.

Your dumb brain thinks it "biased" to say a team that (a) led by 20 points in the 4th quarter, (b) had a pick-6 that would have made the score 48-28 with 10 minutes left negated by a "block in the back" penalty on a player FAR from the LB who was returning the ball for a Baylor TD, and © had a offensive face mask call negate a game-winning catch with 2 minutes left did not totally blow the game?

What kind of weirdo-biased B1G fan are you?

The kind that has others agreeing with me.

You mean other B1G fans that for years now have had the chance to watch true bias in the form of SEC love?

Yes.

Stooping to falsifying a quote is a new low even for Heiny. I guess that's all Heiny can do since his position was exposed as insipid and empty of all reason.

(01-23-2015 09:58 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:10 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:08 PM)DexterDevil Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:02 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:00 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  Ignore him, he is merely trolling. It is obvious his argument is a complete logical fallacy.

Are you really so illogical and insipid that you would deny that Baylor gave away the game?

You must realize there's a reason why no non Big Ten team fans are siding with you right?

Who cares who "sides" with whom? Everyone with more than 10 brain cells knows Baylor gave the game away. If that receiver doesn't get flagged for a completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is over, Michigan State loses.

It's that simple.

And funny, but the only ones I see arguing the point are Iowa, Illinois, and MSU fans.

Michigan State came back and put 21 points on the board to win it, it wasn't like Baylor fumbled with a 2 point lead with a minute to go, Michigan State finished out the game strong and had to take advantage of Baylors mistakes. Still had to go down the field and win it, they didn't just luck out. Did you watch the game?

I watched the whole game and it WAS exactly like Baylor fumbled with a two point lead and a minute to go. It was arguably even worse: With just a couple minutes left and a 6 point lead, Baylor converted a pass that should have put the ball at the MSU *one* yard line, and with MSU down to just one timeout.

That play would SURELY have ended the game, but it was negated by a facemask call on the Baylor WR. That put the ball back at the MSU 23 and set the stage for the blocked FG that gave MSU one last chance. Absent that completely unneeded facemask penalty, the game is OVER. All of MSU's drives for TDs would have been useless if that facemask doesn't happen.

And that's before we even mention Baylor having a pick-6 that would have given them a 48-28 lead with just 10 minutes left called back by a block-in-back penalty that was wholly unnecessary as well. The Baylor player pushed a MSU *lineman* who was 5 yards behind the Baylor LB returning the ball for a TD and had ZERO chance of catching him.

Seriously, if you don't think Baylor didn't literally give the game away, you surely did not watch it.

Heck, Baylor started the 4th quarter with the BALL and a 20 point lead, AND gained *90* yards that quarter even though they were in total shutdown mode! The only way you lose that is if you GIVE the game away, no matter what the other team does on offense.

(01-24-2015 11:20 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 07:34 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:32 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:22 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:18 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  Your dumb brain thinks it "biased" to say a team that (a) led by 20 points in the 4th quarter, (b) had a pick-6 that would have made the score 48-28 with 10 minutes left negated by a "block in the back" penalty on a player FAR from the LB who was returning the ball for a Baylor TD, and © had a offensive face mask call negate a game-winning catch with 2 minutes left did not totally blow the game?

What kind of weirdo-biased B1G fan are you?

The kind that has others agreeing with me.

You mean other B1G fans that for years now have had the chance to watch true bias in the form of SEC love?

Yes.

Stooping to falsifying a quote is a new low even for Heiny, he has almost reached my own low level. I guess that's all Heiny can do since his position was proven without a shadow of a doubt and yet still stupid people such as myself still attempt to make ridiculous arguments such as this in an attempt to garner his attention.

Damn, that is two in a row. Well done Quo.

(01-24-2015 12:52 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-24-2015 11:20 AM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 07:34 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:32 PM)quo vadis Wrote:  

(01-23-2015 06:22 PM)He1nousOne Wrote:  The kind that has others agreeing with me.

You mean other B1G fans that for years now have had the chance to watch true bias in the form of SEC love?

Yes.

Stooping to falsifying a quote is a new low even for Heiny, he has almost reached my own low level. I guess that's all Heiny can do since his position was proven without a shadow of a doubt and yet still stupid people such as myself still attempt to make ridiculous arguments such as this in an attempt to garner his attention.

Damn, that is two in a row. Well done Quo.

Heiny, your position was not only thoroughly disproven, you've proven to be a liar as well.