(09-05-2014 05:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 04:43 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 04:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  If I was a betting man, I'd be tempted to take the points. UCLA's offense is weak, and our D is pretty dang good. The issue is how many times their unreal D scores on us. They got 3 TDs on UVA.

A better question is how good is your quarterback at protecting the ball?

That's the same question from the other end of the play (Karam threw more INTs than TDs in his RS fteshman year). But maybe even more pertinent is whether our WRs and RBs hold onto the ball.

Lynch?

(09-05-2014 06:21 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 05:37 PM)ncbeta Wrote:  UCLA didn't look spectacular against UVA. If this Memphis team is as good as Tiger fans say....well...who knows, right? Go Memphis.

who said that? point them out to me so i can slap them

I think most fans have been saying 6-6 before the season.

memphis is good this year i expect a good game.........go tigers

(09-05-2014 07:21 PM)tnzazz Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 06:21 PM)shere khan Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 05:37 PM)ncbeta Wrote:  UCLA didn't look spectacular against UVA. If this Memphis team is as good as Tiger fans say....well...who knows, right? Go Memphis.

who said that? point them out to me so i can slap them

I think most fans have been saying 6-6 before the season.

Most were hoping for 6-6 and many expected 5-7. I like most believe the team is improved but the schedule has as well.

(09-05-2014 05:29 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 05:16 PM)72Tiger Wrote:  We fumbled a lot against Austin Peay in the opener. A whole lot. Got most of them back. If we do that against UCLA it could get ugly. Hold onto the ball, and I think it could be a good game.

Then that is not good. UCLA plays for the strips. Maybe your guys should just forget about the YAC and just hit the dirt after catches.

I've actually wondered why more coaches don't preach just that. Get both hands on the ball and go down if they're attempting to strip the ball.

(09-05-2014 07:19 PM)oakland steve Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 05:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 04:43 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 04:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  If I was a betting man, I'd be tempted to take the points. UCLA's offense is weak, and our D is pretty dang good. The issue is how many times their unreal D scores on us. They got 3 TDs on UVA.

A better question is how good is your quarterback at protecting the ball?

That's the same question from the other end of the play (Karam threw more INTs than TDs in his RS fteshman year). But maybe even more pertinent is whether our WRs and RBs hold onto the ball.

Lynch?

LOL. Yeah, Lynch. Brain fart.

(09-05-2014 07:19 PM)oakland steve Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 05:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 04:43 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(09-05-2014 04:38 PM)TripleA Wrote:  If I was a betting man, I'd be tempted to take the points. UCLA's offense is weak, and our D is pretty dang good. The issue is how many times their unreal D scores on us. They got 3 TDs on UVA.

A better question is how good is your quarterback at protecting the ball?

That's the same question from the other end of the play (Karam threw more INTs than TDs in his RS fteshman year). But maybe even more pertinent is whether our WRs and RBs hold onto the ball.

Lynch?

LOL. Yeah, Lynch. Brain fart.