Tulsa 1-0 1-0
East Carolina 0-0 1-0
Memphis 0-0 1-0
South Florida 0-0 1-0
Temple 0-0 1-0
Cincinnati 0-0 0-0
Southern Methodist 0-0 0-0
Central Florida 0-0 0-1
Houston 0-0 0-1
Navy 0-0 0-1
UConn 0-0 0-1
Tulane 0-1 0-1

Navy isn't in the AAC

Speaking of shaky start....ACC wasn't very impressive in several games

wake lost to ULM
Cuse beat Nova by 2pts in OT
NCST beat GASO by 1pt
Clemson was blown out
#1FSU beats an unranked OKST by 6pt

(08-31-2014 07:21 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  Navy isn't in the AAC

Well, there's a long thread on here for the Navy/ohio st game. It goes both ways. Wilkie's going to count Navy as an AAC every time they lose, but the fans on here will count Navy this year only win they win.--yes, watch this will unfold all year. I saw it last year with ECU, Tulane and Tulsa.

Given that a number of teams still schedule FCS cupcakes early, it's obviously too early to tell how a conference will do.

I still expect to see 7 American conference teams bowl eligible (UC, UCF, ECU, Houston, Temple, Tulsa, Memphis) and the AAC champ in the Access Bowl this year.

You can do you conference assessment then.

(08-31-2014 02:59 AM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  Tulsa 1-0 1-0
East Carolina 0-0 1-0
Memphis 0-0 1-0
South Florida 0-0 1-0
Temple 0-0 1-0
Cincinnati 0-0 0-0
Southern Methodist 0-0 0-0
Central Florida 0-0 0-1
Houston 0-0 0-1
Navy 0-0 0-1
UConn 0-0 0-1
Tulane 0-1 0-1

Tulane lost to another AAC team.
UCONN played their first game under a new HC.
Houston was a bad loss.
UCF lost against Penn State on a last second field goal.
NAVY isn't in the standings this year.

All things considered, Houston is my only concern when looking at that. The conference is shooting par at the very least. Temple just beat a 9-win SEC team ON THE ROAD. UCF just showcased their program in a super competitive game against a historic football power.

I'm liking what I'm seeing overall.

Would have really liked for UCF to pull that one out.

Compare that to last years first week and we are off to a better start

(08-31-2014 07:24 AM)Bearcats#1 Wrote:  Speaking of shaky start....ACC wasn't very impressive in several games

wake lost to ULM
Cuse beat Nova by 2pts in OT
NCST beat GASO by 1pt
Clemson was blown out
#1FSU beats an unranked OKST by 6pt

Agreed - ACC football was unimpressive in week 1.
Va Tech can correct that problem in Columbus, OH

(08-31-2014 09:37 AM)Cubanbull Wrote:  Compare that to last years first week and we are off to a better start

Exactly.

The gloom and doom over here last year after week one was over the top.

(08-30-2014 03:52 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  Those of you on here saying that the "UCONN loss was expected" blah blah...are dishonest as hell today. Most of you were predicting that UCONN was going to beat byu. Now that I point out that it was a negative for the league the same people are saying that the game doesn't count, it was no surprise, it's a wash. That's BS and you know it. I won't say names or reply to your quotes; we all know who you are.

Your full of crap. Nobody expected UConn to win that game. Now Houston's debacle was not expected, but a UConn loss was pretty predictable. They had a total rebuild to do there---it's going to take a little time for UConn to get to where they want to be. Frankly, I don't think you are an ECU fan. Im pretty sure you are a MW shill left over from Boise's short stay.

(08-31-2014 09:24 AM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  

(08-31-2014 02:59 AM)Wilkie01 Wrote:  Tulsa 1-0 1-0
East Carolina 0-0 1-0
Memphis 0-0 1-0
South Florida 0-0 1-0
Temple 0-0 1-0
Cincinnati 0-0 0-0
Southern Methodist 0-0 0-0
Central Florida 0-0 0-1
Houston 0-0 0-1
Navy 0-0 0-1
UConn 0-0 0-1
Tulane 0-1 0-1

Tulane lost to another AAC team.
UCONN played their first game under a new HC.
Houston was a bad loss.
UCF lost against Penn State on a last second field goal.
NAVY isn't in the standings this year.

All things considered, Houston is my only concern when looking at that. The conference is shooting par at the very least. Temple just beat a 9-win SEC team ON THE ROAD. UCF just showcased their program in a super competitive game against a historic football power.

I'm liking what I'm seeing overall.

I'm fairly sure our coach shot himself in the foot with his low effort OC hire. I don't think Bush has a clue as an OC. After Friday nights performance I think we are probsbl a 3 win team this year. The talent is there, but a special teams head coach is only as good as his OC and DC. He swung and missed again on OC. The last time he swung and missed on OC we were 5-7 with a really advantageous (missed most of the good teams that year) CUSA schedule. This year, the schedule looks tougher. I say 3 wins---one of which will be an FCS team. I've seen enough of the Levine clown show. Levine is just not consistent enough to stay with any longer and I'm officially ready to move on to a new guy.

Houston is a concern. did not seem like the coaching staff had the team ready to paly. hate to see the Cougars struggle in there 1st season in a new stadium...this is a golden opportunity to build the fan base....

(08-31-2014 11:48 AM)No Bull Wrote:  Houston is a concern. did not seem like the coaching staff had the team ready to paly. hate to see the Cougars struggle in there 1st season in a new stadium...this is a golden opportunity to build the fan base....

Well, the talent is there as most of last years team returned. The defense is solid when they are not dealing with 6 turnovers and eight 45 second 3-and -outs by the offense in one half of football. The offense has some weapons---we will see if they can fix the Bush middle school offense enough to at least score 15-20 points a game (cant believe I'd ever have to say that this year).

(08-31-2014 02:26 PM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-31-2014 11:48 AM)No Bull Wrote:  Houston is a concern. did not seem like the coaching staff had the team ready to paly. hate to see the Cougars struggle in there 1st season in a new stadium...this is a golden opportunity to build the fan base....

Well, the talent is there as most of last years team returned. The defense is solid when they are not dealing with 6 turnovers and eight 45 second 3-and -outs by the offense in one half of football. The offense has some weapons---we will see if they can fix the Bush's middle school offense enough to at least score 15-20 points a game (cant believe I'd ever have to say that this year).

I can't believe it either, Attackcoog... smh

I still think that Case Keenum has a future in the league, but if he needed a job, I'd take him over Bush without blinking.

(08-31-2014 10:06 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-30-2014 03:52 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  Those of you on here saying that the "UCONN loss was expected" blah blah...are dishonest as hell today. Most of you were predicting that UCONN was going to beat byu. Now that I point out that it was a negative for the league the same people are saying that the game doesn't count, it was no surprise, it's a wash. That's BS and you know it. I won't say names or reply to your quotes; we all know who you are.

Your full of crap. Nobody expected UConn to win that game. Now Houston's debacle was not expected, but a UConn loss was pretty predictable. They had a total rebuild to do there---it's going to take a little time for UConn to get to where they want to be. Frankly, I don't think you are an ECU fan. Im pretty sure you are a MW shill left over from Boise's short stay.

Frankly, you've been an a$$hole to me every since I've been posting so I don't care what you think. You've accused me of being a sun belt and cusa and now mwc "shill" before so I'll just be grateful that I don't get accused of being a "MAC shill" by you. I bet if I was easier on the Houston Coogs you'd be OK with me but every time I say anything about Houston or don't drink the new conference kool aid you bash me. Normally, I'd accuse anyone in Texas that claimed to be a Houston fan a fake, but sadly, you really are a Houston fan. Every time you write about how Houston fits the "PAC profile", or your other typical delusional pro-Houston Coog nonsense I'm going to reply to it with common sense. You are a true homer.

(08-31-2014 10:06 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-30-2014 03:52 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  Those of you on here saying that the "UCONN loss was expected" blah blah...are dishonest as hell today. Most of you were predicting that UCONN was going to beat byu. Now that I point out that it was a negative for the league the same people are saying that the game doesn't count, it was no surprise, it's a wash. That's BS and you know it. I won't say names or reply to your quotes; we all know who you are.

Your full of crap. Nobody expected UConn to win that game. Now Houston's debacle was not expected, but a UConn loss was pretty predictable. They had a total rebuild to do there---it's going to take a little time for UConn to get to where they want to be. Frankly, I don't think you are an ECU fan. Im pretty sure you are a MW shill left over from Boise's short stay.

Attackcoog, Please answer this question; I know you have the time and you do care about this because you've called me out too many times not to. Do you think I attended ECU but am not a true fan of ECU?...or do you think I didn't graduate (or attend at all) from ECU and am making it up? I'm assuming the latter because who the hell would pretend to be an ECU fan if they had no ties to it. (Like Houston) If you do indeed think the latter, please ask me as specific questions about ECU as you can think. IE where I lived, names of professors,info about on campus living, off campus, stuff pertaining to Greenville/Ayden/Pitt County area nicknames, bars etc. tidbits about the area only locals would know. Call my bluff.

Dumb thread is still dumb

Posted from my mobile device using the CSNbbs App

(08-31-2014 05:04 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  

(08-31-2014 10:06 AM)Attackcoog Wrote:  

(08-30-2014 03:52 PM)billybobby777 Wrote:  Those of you on here saying that the "UCONN loss was expected" blah blah...are dishonest as hell today. Most of you were predicting that UCONN was going to beat byu. Now that I point out that it was a negative for the league the same people are saying that the game doesn't count, it was no surprise, it's a wash. That's BS and you know it. I won't say names or reply to your quotes; we all know who you are.

Your full of crap. Nobody expected UConn to win that game. Now Houston's debacle was not expected, but a UConn loss was pretty predictable. They had a total rebuild to do there---it's going to take a little time for UConn to get to where they want to be. Frankly, I don't think you are an ECU fan. Im pretty sure you are a MW shill left over from Boise's short stay.

Attackcoog, Please answer this question; I know you have the time and you do care about this because you've called me out too many times not to. Do you think I attended ECU but am not a true fan of ECU?...or do you think I didn't graduate (or attend at all) from ECU and am making it up? I'm assuming the latter because who the hell would pretend to be an ECU fan if they had no ties to it. (Like Houston) If you do indeed think the latter, please ask me as specific questions about ECU as you can think. IE where I lived, names of professors,info about on campus living, off campus, stuff pertaining to Greenville/Ayden/Pitt County area nicknames, bars etc. tidbits about the area only locals would know. Call my bluff.

I didn't go to ECU. Here, I'll let you do all the talking.

Hi, I was born and raised in Iowa. I've been a football fan since I was 5 (32 years) and old enough to comprehend that my cousin was a starter for the Iowa Hawkeye football team that played in the Rose Bowl. When I was a teenager my family moved us from Iowa to the SW area and I wasn't able to go to school at Iowa due to out of state tuition like some of my other family members. (Also have a brother who ran track--800--for the Hawkeyes) Due to the move and later, enlistment into the Army, I've moved around a lot and got my BA from a non P5 school after attending a few different universities. Yes, I still follow Iowa, but I'd rather see ECU and Army do well so that they get into the highest level of football with the hawkeyes. I believe that the BCS is an unfair, unAmerican system. I have a great job from Certified Labs in Texas, and I still serve in the US Army Reserves.

http://csnbbs.com/user-66571.html

All that and you mentioned ECU once. lol....I don't know any ECU fans like that. I think you like ECU like I like Rice---casually. You do talk an awful lot about Iowa and admit you lived in the SW (you know, where the MW is the major G5 league). Im pretty decent to folks on here, so if I treated you poorly, you probably deserved it long before I finally let you have it. Frankly, I have no problem if you are a MW or an Iowa fan or an FCS fan. I just think people need to understand where posters are really coming from with their opinions. Nothing wrong with being a MW fan. I enjoy watching some MW teams as well and am a big proponent of a nationwide league that's a mish-mash of both the AAC and MW. What I don't believe is you are the typical ECU fan we see on this board. I think you are more of a general college football fan. That said, much like real ECU fans, if you attack my school---I will respond. Im a homer. That's what a fan is--and Ive never claimed not to be a fan. Believe it or not, Im the not a coolaide drinker. lol....I get hammered on Coog boards for being too negative. Ive been around a long time. I know what the real score is. I know schools like mine are in trouble and Friday night didn't help.

btw--I do thank you for your service to our nation.

wilke why you coming in here an being a dich, just stay the fuch out of here, your totally out of line, rubbing it in our face, how did wf do and nc state almost looses to ga southern............