Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
CCG Deregulation looks good
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
TrueBlueAlum Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,091
Joined: Mar 2013
Reputation: 39
I Root For: GA Southern
Location:
Post: #31
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
(04-15-2014 02:14 PM)statefanatic Wrote:  I still think we need to go to 12. I like the idea of divisions and the rivalries it brings.

I agree with this, but only if it means the long term plan is removing Idaho and/or NMSU (if they don't come all-sports) and finding 2/3 teams that will overwhelmingly benefit the conference. There's just a lot that could happen.

Don't forget this is all assuming this legislation passes BEFORE the invite deadline, otherwise we may be inviting someone and then finding out later we didn't have to.
04-15-2014 02:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
statefanatic Offline
Howl at the Moon
*

Posts: 2,869
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 42
I Root For: stAte
Location: jonesboro
Post: #32
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
The best plan would be to add JMU or Liberty to the East. Add MSU to replace Idaho in 2016.
04-15-2014 02:26 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GaSoEagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,790
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 45
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
Post: #33
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
I can't imagine a single school would vote not to part ways with Idaho.
04-15-2014 02:27 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
asupatch Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 442
Joined: Oct 2011
Reputation: 2
I Root For: APPY STATE!!
Location: Denver, CO
Post: #34
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
(04-15-2014 02:27 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  I can't imagine a single school would vote not to part ways with Idaho.

NMSU?
04-15-2014 02:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GaSoEagle Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,790
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 45
I Root For: Ga Southern
Location:
Post: #35
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
Ok but I don't even know if NMSU, since they are not a full member, would get a vote.
04-15-2014 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
GoApps70 Offline
Moderator
*

Posts: 20,650
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 290
I Root For: Appalachian St.
Location: Charlotte, N. C.
Post: #36
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
Maybe those teams needing a good shot at a football win.
Doubt they would even though.
04-15-2014 02:41 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,794
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 118
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #37
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
(04-15-2014 02:20 PM)GaSoEagle Wrote:  If a 12th team is added (and the conference has voted back in March to do this) it needs to be in the East. If JMU says no and Liberty can't get the votes that probably means we stay at 11 this year.

If we stay at 11 this year a real discussion needs to occur within the conference about whether or not the goal is now 12 or 10 (exiting Idaho at the earliest time possible).

And to add to that, NMSU for all sports to bring the olympic sports to 12 teams.
04-15-2014 02:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
CajunExpress Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,914
Joined: May 2012
Reputation: 23
I Root For: Louisiana
Location:
Post: #38
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
Let's stay at 11. UT at Arlington will have football, they are Texans and cannot help themselves.
04-15-2014 02:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Ed Harley Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 73
Joined: Mar 2014
Reputation: 2
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #39
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
(04-15-2014 02:26 PM)statefanatic Wrote:  The best plan would be to add JMU or Liberty to the East. Add MSU to replace Idaho in 2016.

No, it wouldn't. Divisions or no divisions, we need to stay put until a strong candidate for expansion emerges. To date, we haven't seen anyone currently ready that fits that description.
(This post was last modified: 04-15-2014 03:08 PM by Ed Harley.)
04-15-2014 03:07 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MWC Tex Offline
Heisman
*

Posts: 5,794
Joined: Aug 2012
Reputation: 118
I Root For: MW
Location: TX
Post: #40
RE: CCG Deregulation looks good
(04-15-2014 02:59 PM)CajunExpress Wrote:  Let's stay at 11. UT at Arlington will have football, they are Texans and cannot help themselves.

Reading their past history in football, I don't think it is possible. Competing against North Texas, SMU, TCU and Dallas Cowboys (not to mention Texas/Oklahoma and A&M) they aren't going to be able to pull FBS type of numbers for their games.

Otherwise, I think they would have started it up already.

Edit: Interesting bit of history while reading. Sept 6, 1980 UTA vs North Texas was the first ESPN college football broadcast but it wasn't shown live due to the CFA contract, it was shown tape delayed.
Put that nuggest for any sport triva in your head there.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maverick_Stadium
(This post was last modified: 04-15-2014 03:55 PM by MWC Tex.)
04-15-2014 03:44 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.