Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
SHWISH Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 198
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1
I Root For: UNLV
Location:
Post: #1
Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
Ask yourself, if you were UMKC and Chicago st, would the wac make sense over the summit?

ORU leave slc, slc replace them with UTRG. why? no doubt in my mind UTRG will add football.

3 loses to the wac.

NMSU gets all sports in the Sunbelt, something I am predicting.

4 wac loses.

Idaho has no choice but to find a new home....
04-11-2014 10:15 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 32,920
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 371
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #2
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
One Prediction I guarantee doesn't come true in your theory. Idaho is no longer a member of the WAC as of July 1.
04-11-2014 10:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SHWISH Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 198
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 1
I Root For: UNLV
Location:
Post: #3
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
(04-11-2014 10:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  One Prediction I guarantee doesn't come true in your theory. Idaho is no longer a member of the WAC as of July 1.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that. But the wac looks like it will die.
04-11-2014 10:35 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 32,920
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 371
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #4
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
(04-11-2014 10:35 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  
(04-11-2014 10:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  One Prediction I guarantee doesn't come true in your theory. Idaho is no longer a member of the WAC as of July 1.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that. But the wac looks like it will die.

Well yeah. That's likely going to happen. Hence why Idaho moved to the Big Sky.

After all of NoDak's Big Sky FBS Posts that you tag along with, I would have thought you might have figured that out already.
04-11-2014 10:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

ValleyBoy Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 1,841
Joined: Oct 2010
Reputation: 39
I Root For: GaSo,Troy
Location: Alabama
Post: #5
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
(04-11-2014 10:40 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(04-11-2014 10:35 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  
(04-11-2014 10:28 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  One Prediction I guarantee doesn't come true in your theory. Idaho is no longer a member of the WAC as of July 1.

Oh yeah, I forgot about that. But the wac looks like it will die.

Well yeah. That's likely going to happen. Hence why Idaho moved to the Big Sky.

After all of NoDak's Big Sky FBS Posts that you tag along with, I would have thought you might have figured that out already.

He aint to smart Chiefsfan due to being kicked in the head to many times trying to get his rocks off with a buffalo.
04-11-2014 11:11 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
TOPSTRAIGHT Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,181
Joined: May 2013
Reputation: 42
I Root For: WKU
Location: Glasgow,KY.
Post: #6
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
Is this real?
04-11-2014 11:16 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 32,920
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 371
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #7
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
(04-11-2014 11:16 PM)TOPSTRAIGHT Wrote:  Is this real?

No...its only real if he mentions Lamar joining the SBC in his post. Otherwise its just fake SWISH.
04-11-2014 11:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply

SoCalBobcat78 Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 959
Joined: Jan 2014
Reputation: 17
I Root For: Texas State
Location:
Post: #8
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
(04-11-2014 10:15 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Ask yourself, if you were UMKC and Chicago st, would the wac make sense over the summit?

ORU leave slc, slc replace them with UTRG. why? no doubt in my mind UTRG will add football.

3 loses to the wac.

NMSU gets all sports in the Sunbelt, something I am predicting.

4 wac loses.

Idaho has no choice but to find a new home....

The Golden Triangle humidity must be affecting your brain. Idaho is leaving for the Big Sky. The WAC is providing a D1 Auto Bid Conference for schools like CSUB, Seattle, Utah Valley, UTRG, Grand Canyon and Chicago State. They are all happy to be in the WAC.

The WAC paid UMKC's exit fee of $250,000 and waived the entry fee of $450,000. UMKC got some vague promises of the WAC post-season tournament moving to Kansas City in the future. UMKC does not play baseball. The Summit needed additional baseball schools (they only have five). The WAC does not (they have ten).

NMSU is in a good situation either way. Right now, the WAC is an easier path to the NCAA Tournament. If the MWC decided to add a 12th school for olympic sports, they are right there. They are probably better off staying in the WAC for now.
04-12-2014 01:08 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
David Krysakowski Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,829
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 13
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #9
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
Today's WAC is not the same as it was when Idaho joined the conference.

Then: Boise State, Fresno State, Hawaii, Idaho, Louisiana Tech, Nevada, New Mexico State, San Jose State, Utah State

Now: Chicago State, CSU Bakersfield, Denver, Grand Canyon, UM Kansas City, Idaho, New Mezico State, Seattle, Utah Valley
(This post was last modified: 04-12-2014 05:05 AM by David Krysakowski.)
04-12-2014 05:02 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
runamuck Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,403
Joined: Aug 2011
Reputation: 21
I Root For: uta
Location: DFW
Post: #10
RE: Idaho might need to leave the SBC sooner
(04-12-2014 01:08 AM)SoCalBobcat78 Wrote:  
(04-11-2014 10:15 PM)SHWISH Wrote:  Ask yourself, if you were UMKC and Chicago st, would the wac make sense over the summit?

ORU leave slc, slc replace them with UTRG. why? no doubt in my mind UTRG will add football.

3 loses to the wac.

NMSU gets all sports in the Sunbelt, something I am predicting.

4 wac loses.

Idaho has no choice but to find a new home....

The Golden Triangle humidity must be affecting your brain. Idaho is leaving for the Big Sky. The WAC is providing a D1 Auto Bid Conference for schools like CSUB, Seattle, Utah Valley, UTRG, Grand Canyon and Chicago State. They are all happy to be in the WAC.

The WAC paid UMKC's exit fee of $250,000 and waived the entry fee of $450,000. UMKC got some vague promises of the WAC post-season tournament moving to Kansas City in the future. UMKC does not play baseball. The Summit needed additional baseball schools (they only have five). The WAC does not (they have ten).

NMSU is in a good situation either way. Right now, the WAC is an easier path to the NCAA Tournament. If the MWC decided to add a 12th school for olympic sports, they are right there. They are probably better off staying in the WAC for now.

who is utrg..are you referring to ut-panam in edinburg. they will never have enough money to add football..
04-12-2014 07:57 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2018 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2018 MyBB Group.