(04-07-2014 08:27 AM)Tiger46 Wrote:  

(04-06-2014 04:54 PM)tigers1125 Wrote:  This was the worst job of seeding I've seen and I have watched virtually every game available for the past 30 years (back when ESPN first got it, you could watch one game at a time). 7 vs 8 proves it. The committee needs to use a little common sense with all the "metrics".

I think they should reseed after each round past 32.

Question: If two #8 seeds made it to the final game, which one would wear the white jerseys?

The one with the better 8 seed. The committee seeds them 1-68.

(04-10-2014 02:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-07-2014 08:27 AM)Tiger46 Wrote:  

(04-06-2014 04:54 PM)tigers1125 Wrote:  This was the worst job of seeding I've seen and I have watched virtually every game available for the past 30 years (back when ESPN first got it, you could watch one game at a time). 7 vs 8 proves it. The committee needs to use a little common sense with all the "metrics".

I think they should reseed after each round past 32.

Question: If two #8 seeds made it to the final game, which one would wear the white jerseys?

The one with the better 8 seed. The committee seeds them 1-68.

I think they do as best they can but they move common seeds aroudn to try to avoid teams in P5 conferences from playing teams in their league in first and second rounds. This year's committee was fixed on the ACC with WFU atheletic director and one other rep, while the AAC had zero.

(04-10-2014 02:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-07-2014 08:27 AM)Tiger46 Wrote:  

(04-06-2014 04:54 PM)tigers1125 Wrote:  This was the worst job of seeding I've seen and I have watched virtually every game available for the past 30 years (back when ESPN first got it, you could watch one game at a time). 7 vs 8 proves it. The committee needs to use a little common sense with all the "metrics".

I think they should reseed after each round past 32.

Question: If two #8 seeds made it to the final game, which one would wear the white jerseys?

The one with the better 8 seed. The committee seeds them 1-68.

that's right, I forgot we were the #1 #1 seed in 08.

(04-11-2014 11:11 AM)Tigeer Wrote:  

(04-10-2014 02:21 PM)TripleA Wrote:  

(04-07-2014 08:27 AM)Tiger46 Wrote:  

(04-06-2014 04:54 PM)tigers1125 Wrote:  This was the worst job of seeding I've seen and I have watched virtually every game available for the past 30 years (back when ESPN first got it, you could watch one game at a time). 7 vs 8 proves it. The committee needs to use a little common sense with all the "metrics".

I think they should reseed after each round past 32.

Question: If two #8 seeds made it to the final game, which one would wear the white jerseys?

The one with the better 8 seed. The committee seeds them 1-68.

I think they do as best they can but they move common seeds aroudn to try to avoid teams in P5 conferences from playing teams in their league in first and second rounds. This year's committee was fixed on the ACC with WFU atheletic director and one other rep, while the AAC had zero.

And it still didn't work out for the ACC.