(04-05-2014 07:58 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:46 PM)PirateHeist Wrote:  Yeah.. who would want to play in a league with basketball teams that played in both the NCAA Championships and NIT Championships.

you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

U of L leaves. three bids max. Plus ecu and tulsa have been in the league with Memphis for how long???? If your not doing it year in and year out now your not going to.

It took Eustacy years to build USM up to the point where you all are now. So it is not like USM has been doing this year in and year out. Others schools build over time too, so it can be done.

i never said we have been. But you guys underachieve in your best and are pitiful in other years. Until uconn finds its next home, you in WAYYYY over your heads. Only way that group ever gets more than 3 is if a accident happens in the conf tourney.

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:57 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:46 PM)PirateHeist Wrote:  Yeah.. who would want to play in a league with basketball teams that played in both the NCAA Championships and NIT Championships.

you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

and with all those upper AAC schools playing w/ 4 & 5 star athletes, Tulsa will be playing not at that same level right away

Wait a minute. There were people on this board just 3 weeks ago talking about how CUSA schools could beat AAC schools like Memphis, SMU, UConn and Cincinnati. Now your statement is that Tulsa could not compete against those schools, because those schools will be playing with 4 and 5 star athletes. That is inconsistent reasoning, especially considering that Tulsa is CUSA's best team.

show me this evidence that anyone made those comments, it sure as hell wasn't from me and why would White take his chances at Tulsa when he could stay at Tech one more year and possibly get his "dream" job at Ole Miss

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:46 PM)PirateHeist Wrote:  Yeah.. who would want to play in a league with basketball teams that played in both the NCAA Championships and NIT Championships.

you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

U of L leaves. three bids max. Plus ecu and tulsa have been in the league with Memphis for how long???? If your not doing it year in and year out now your not going to.

I think UConns win tonight has given the AAC some very important basketball credibility. This has to help the other teams in the league. I think 3 n reasonable to expect, and in good years 5.

The only ones who got any cred from that win was uconn themself, and they are taking the first train out of town.

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:58 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

U of L leaves. three bids max. Plus ecu and tulsa have been in the league with Memphis for how long???? If your not doing it year in and year out now your not going to.

It took Eustacy years to build USM up to the point where you all are now. So it is not like USM has been doing this year in and year out. Others schools build over time too, so it can be done.

i never said we have been. But you guys underachieve in your best and are pitiful in other years. Until uconn finds its next home, you in WAYYYY over your heads. Only way that group ever gets more than 3 is if a accident happens in the conf tourney.

Like I told you guys weeks back; UConn is a really good team. I am telling you now the team to beat in the AAC next year is not UConn. SMU is the team to beat. Another thing to remember about ECU roster was short last season. ECU will not win the AAC next season, but they should be really competitive. And the AAC will probably have 5 bids next year at minimum.

(04-05-2014 08:04 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

U of L leaves. three bids max. Plus ecu and tulsa have been in the league with Memphis for how long???? If your not doing it year in and year out now your not going to.

I think UConns win tonight has given the AAC some very important basketball credibility. This has to help the other teams in the league. I think 3 n reasonable to expect, and in good years 5.

The only ones who got any cred from that win was uconn themself, and they are taking the first train out of town.

UConn not going anywhere soon, plus the AAC received great publicity tonight. Again, I will be the first to admit that ECU adds nothing to the league for basketball.

(04-05-2014 08:02 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:57 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

and with all those upper AAC schools playing w/ 4 & 5 star athletes, Tulsa will be playing not at that same level right away

Wait a minute. There were people on this board just 3 weeks ago talking about how CUSA schools could beat AAC schools like Memphis, SMU, UConn and Cincinnati. Now your statement is that Tulsa could not compete against those schools, because those schools will be playing with 4 and 5 star athletes. That is inconsistent reasoning, especially considering that Tulsa is CUSA's best team.

show me this evidence that anyone made those comments, it sure as hell wasn't from me and why would White take his chances at Tulsa when he could stay at Tech one more year and possibly get his "dream" job at Ole Miss

http://csnbbs.com/thread-681496-post-105...id10537883

If the money is right they will move.

Look at how much we were willing to shell out for Manning and he was a 2 year coach.

Im just passing what I hear on the internet. Ive never claimed any real sources.

Someone pointed out on the tulsa board that Tyndall wins with Jucos. Thats not going to fly @ Tulsa with our admissions requirements.

(04-05-2014 08:04 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:58 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

U of L leaves. three bids max. Plus ecu and tulsa have been in the league with Memphis for how long???? If your not doing it year in and year out now your not going to.

It took Eustacy years to build USM up to the point where you all are now. So it is not like USM has been doing this year in and year out. Others schools build over time too, so it can be done.

i never said we have been. But you guys underachieve in your best and are pitiful in other years. Until uconn finds its next home, you in WAYYYY over your heads. Only way that group ever gets more than 3 is if a accident happens in the conf tourney.

Like I told you guys weeks back; UConn is a really good team. I am telling you now the team to beat in the AAC next year is not UConn. SMU is the team to beat. Another thing to remember about ECU roster was short last season. ECU will not win the AAC next season, but they should be really competitive. And the AAC will probably have 5 bids next year at minimum.

That group has about the same chance of 5 bids as they had of that magical 20 million dollar a year tv contract we heard so much about.

For the record this is DT's list. Lsu, Louisville, Kentucky, michigan, mich st. He is in hattiesburg until one of those gives him a shot.

(04-05-2014 08:08 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:02 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:01 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:57 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

and with all those upper AAC schools playing w/ 4 & 5 star athletes, Tulsa will be playing not at that same level right away

Wait a minute. There were people on this board just 3 weeks ago talking about how CUSA schools could beat AAC schools like Memphis, SMU, UConn and Cincinnati. Now your statement is that Tulsa could not compete against those schools, because those schools will be playing with 4 and 5 star athletes. That is inconsistent reasoning, especially considering that Tulsa is CUSA's best team.

show me this evidence that anyone made those comments, it sure as hell wasn't from me and why would White take his chances at Tulsa when he could stay at Tech one more year and possibly get his "dream" job at Ole Miss

http://csnbbs.com/thread-681496-post-105...id10537883

well it wasn't the comments of all CUSA fans, just some

(04-05-2014 08:08 PM)panicstricken Wrote:  If the money is right they will move.

Look at how much we were willing to shell out for Manning and he was a 2 year coach.

Im just passing what I hear on the internet. Ive never claimed any real sources.

Someone pointed out on the tulsa board that Tyndall wins with Jucos. Thats not going to fly @ Tulsa with our admissions requirements.

Well then why in the world would you guys want to make such asses of yourself over a coach who only recruits stupid players.

Manninggate also opened up a lot of eyes about how much Tulsa was willing to pay for the right coach.

(04-05-2014 07:04 PM)AndreWhere Wrote:  Tyndall isn't going to Tulsa... ever... and if there were a USM fan that you could convince otherwise, it would be me. I'm well aware that the gulf between the AAC and CDOA is huge, much bigger than most people here would admit. That said, Tyndall isn't going to Tulsa

see???....I agree with you on some things.....this is definitely one of those times....

(04-05-2014 07:46 PM)PirateHeist Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:28 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  Most folks don't like lateral moves.

If it's not a P5 school, it's not worth the move.

Yeah.. who would want to play in a league with basketball teams that played in both the NCAA Championships and NIT Championships.

lmfao at an envious crossbone.......you gotta be kiddin' me

you do realize that ul....gone......uconn....gone very soon.....fkn really.....can't help but laugh.....like the aac is some prima donna conference moving forward

how people don't realize we are all in the same shitehole is beyond me.....

(04-05-2014 08:04 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Like I told you guys weeks back; UConn is a really good team. I am telling you now the team to beat in the AAC next year is not UConn. SMU is the team to beat. Another thing to remember about ECU roster was short last season. ECU will not win the AAC next season, but they should be really competitive. And the AAC will probably have 5 bids next year at minimum.

Yep, SMU swept UConn this year.

(04-05-2014 07:56 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:52 PM)baruna falls Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:48 PM)techdawg88 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:46 PM)PirateHeist Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 07:28 PM)RUNVSFD MINER Wrote:  Most folks don't like lateral moves.

If it's not a P5 school, it's not worth the move.

Yeah.. who would want to play in a league with basketball teams that played in both the NCAA Championships and NIT Championships.

you really expect Tulsa & ECU to compete with the top of the AAC right away?

Tulsa much better shape than ECU. ECU is years away from being good. Tulsa however, is competitive right now. Plus recruiting will be easier n the AAC because of UConn, Memphis and Cincy. A three to five bid league has to have some attraction to it as a coach right.

I disagree with your assessment. IMO ECU would have been really good this year if they did not have so much attrition and even then ECU still finished with an overall winning record. It is all about ECU keeping kids.

more blah blah blah.....nothing on the floor to back it up....oops, forgot about that 3pt sharp shooter in richmond that did wonders.....

why are you still posting here other than to be a ninny......

(04-05-2014 08:21 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  lmfao at an envious crossbone.......you gotta be kiddin' me

you do realize that ul....gone......uconn....gone very soon.....fkn really.....can't help but laugh.....like the aac is some prima donna conference moving forward

how people don't realize we are all in the same shitehole is beyond me.....

You have any information about where UConn is going?

(04-05-2014 08:25 PM)cotton1991 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:04 PM)PirateMarv Wrote:  Like I told you guys weeks back; UConn is a really good team. I am telling you now the team to beat in the AAC next year is not UConn. SMU is the team to beat. Another thing to remember about ECU roster was short last season. ECU will not win the AAC next season, but they should be really competitive. And the AAC will probably have 5 bids next year at minimum.

Yep, SMU swept UConn this year.

yep.....and smu lost to miny-minnoso......

what the fk is your point.....in single elimination, anyone can lose.....

how are the mods allowing these stupid posts to continue....

(04-05-2014 08:29 PM)cotton1991 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:21 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  lmfao at an envious crossbone.......you gotta be kiddin' me

you do realize that ul....gone......uconn....gone very soon.....fkn really.....can't help but laugh.....like the aac is some prima donna conference moving forward

how people don't realize we are all in the same shitehole is beyond me.....

You have any information about where UConn is going?

Not sure but Tuesday is coming.

(04-05-2014 08:29 PM)cotton1991 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:21 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  lmfao at an envious crossbone.......you gotta be kiddin' me

you do realize that ul....gone......uconn....gone very soon.....fkn really.....can't help but laugh.....like the aac is some prima donna conference moving forward

how people don't realize we are all in the same shitehole is beyond me.....

You have any information about where UConn is going?

nope....just know that they will....book it.....I bookmarked for future ref....

(04-05-2014 08:32 PM)Thegoldstandard Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:29 PM)cotton1991 Wrote:  

(04-05-2014 08:21 PM)stinkfist Wrote:  lmfao at an envious crossbone.......you gotta be kiddin' me

you do realize that ul....gone......uconn....gone very soon.....fkn really.....can't help but laugh.....like the aac is some prima donna conference moving forward

how people don't realize we are all in the same shitehole is beyond me.....

You have any information about where UConn is going?

Not sure but Tuesday is coming.

lmfao!!!!