(11-29-2013 11:40 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Virtually none are.

Is this you?

From what I can recall, Goebbels' films and Mengele's experiements were also peer reviewed.

That worked out well.

(11-29-2013 11:44 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:40 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Virtually none are.

Is this you?

It's a myth. Not factual. A lie.

Why do you want to relegate yourself to telling tells?

(11-29-2013 11:53 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:44 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:40 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Virtually none are.

Is this you?

It's a myth. Not factual. A lie.

Why do you want to relegate yourself to telling tells?

So you're saying that Anthony Watts getting money from the Heartland Institute is a lie? Or Miller getting money from Koch Industry? Did you read anything that I linked you to?

IS ALL OF THAT A CONSPIRACY?

(11-29-2013 11:48 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  From what I can recall, Goebbels' films and Mengele's experiements were also peer reviewed.

That worked out well.

Are you trying to make a point by bringing up Nazis? Have you heard of the term Reductio ad Hitlerum?

(11-30-2013 12:04 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:53 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:44 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:40 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Virtually none are.

Is this you?

It's a myth. Not factual. A lie.

Why do you want to relegate yourself to telling tells?

So you're saying that Anthony Watts getting money from the Heartland Institute is a lie? Or Miller getting money from Koch Industry? Did you read anything that I linked you to?

IS ALL OF THAT A CONSPIRACY?

A couple of guys would be virtually none thus, not many as you falsely claim.

This whole big oil buys skepticism is as big a fraud as global warming.

(11-30-2013 12:13 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:04 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:53 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:44 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:40 PM)Paul M Wrote:  Virtually none are.

Is this you?

It's a myth. Not factual. A lie.

Why do you want to relegate yourself to telling tells?

So you're saying that Anthony Watts getting money from the Heartland Institute is a lie? Or Miller getting money from Koch Industry? Did you read anything that I linked you to?

IS ALL OF THAT A CONSPIRACY?

A couple of guys would be virtually none thus, not many as you falsely claim.

This whole big oil buys skepticism is as big a fraud as global warming.

It's obvious that you didn't click on the links. It seems like you guys always end up grasping at any straw you can find, regardless of how insignificant it is. It's okay though, I understand. It's been observed in experiments that people actually become more entrenched in their beliefs in the face of contradicting evidence. I shouldn't expect to ever get through to you guys.

(11-30-2013 12:05 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:48 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  From what I can recall, Goebbels' films and Mengele's experiements were also peer reviewed.

That worked out well.

Are you trying to make a point by bringing up Nazis? Have you heard of the term Reductio ad Hitlerum?

Science was used to promote and support a social agenda in the 1930's and 1940's. That is not absurd, but rather, our history. Again, I ask, did Mengele's "peers" challenge his work?

(11-30-2013 12:25 AM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:05 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:48 PM)ODUsmitty Wrote:  From what I can recall, Goebbels' films and Mengele's experiements were also peer reviewed.

That worked out well.

Are you trying to make a point by bringing up Nazis? Have you heard of the term Reductio ad Hitlerum?

Science was used to promote and support a social agenda in the 1930's and 1940's. That is not absurd, but rather, our history. Again, I ask, did Mengele's "peers" challenge his work?

You're drawing parallels between two subjects that are not at all equivalent.

You're also trying to connect ethics and scientific validity, which are not necessarily related.

(11-30-2013 12:16 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:13 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:04 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:53 PM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:44 PM)dmacfour Wrote:  Is this you?

It's a myth. Not factual. A lie.

Why do you want to relegate yourself to telling tells?

So you're saying that Anthony Watts getting money from the Heartland Institute is a lie? Or Miller getting money from Koch Industry? Did you read anything that I linked you to?

IS ALL OF THAT A CONSPIRACY?

A couple of guys would be virtually none thus, not many as you falsely claim.

This whole big oil buys skepticism is as big a fraud as global warming.

It's obvious that you didn't click on the links. It seems like you guys always end up grasping at any straw you can find, regardless of how insignificant it is. It's okay though, I understand. It's been observed in experiments that people actually become more entrenched in their beliefs in the face of contradicting evidence. I shouldn't expect to ever get through to you guys.

Yes, the contradicting evidence is mounting. Yes, you are becoming more entrenched in your false beliefs in the face of said evidence. No one's trying to get through to you. Do you not recognize mocking?

(11-30-2013 12:33 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:16 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:13 AM)Paul M Wrote:  

(11-30-2013 12:04 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  

(11-29-2013 11:53 PM)Paul M Wrote:  It's a myth. Not factual. A lie.

Why do you want to relegate yourself to telling tells?

So you're saying that Anthony Watts getting money from the Heartland Institute is a lie? Or Miller getting money from Koch Industry? Did you read anything that I linked you to?

IS ALL OF THAT A CONSPIRACY?

A couple of guys would be virtually none thus, not many as you falsely claim.

This whole big oil buys skepticism is as big a fraud as global warming.

It's obvious that you didn't click on the links. It seems like you guys always end up grasping at any straw you can find, regardless of how insignificant it is. It's okay though, I understand. It's been observed in experiments that people actually become more entrenched in their beliefs in the face of contradicting evidence. I shouldn't expect to ever get through to you guys.

Yes, the contradicting evidence is mounting. Yes, you are becoming more entrenched in your false beliefs in the face of said evidence. No one's trying to get through to you. Do you not recognize mocking?

I've recognized that you have no argument to make. You're pretty much just trolling.

If you want to believe in fairy tales, ain't no sweat off my balls.

(11-30-2013 12:36 AM)dmacfour Wrote:  You're pretty much just trolling.

The whole premise of your thread was to troll non believers.

There's nothing to publish when previously published predictions turn out to be wrong.

(11-30-2013 02:07 AM)Claw Wrote:  There's nothing to publish when previously published predictions turn out to be wrong.

(11-30-2013 02:07 AM)Claw Wrote:  There's nothing to publish when previously published predictions turn out to be wrong.

Pretty much. If dmac and the original author knew anything about publishing in the scientific literature, they'd see the absurdity of all of this.