army56mike Wrote:If teams like UCF, Memphis, ECU, Fresno, Boise, Toledo, Tulsa and Bowling Green are mid major, what does that make UConn, Rutgirls, Syrupcuse, Cincy, Duke, WF, Kansas, etc...? Clearly there is little to know competitive difference in these teams.

If you love the cusa schools so much, why dont you stay over at that board and stop trashing fellow BE programs.

cuseroc Wrote:

army56mike Wrote:If teams like UCF, Memphis, ECU, Fresno, Boise, Toledo, Tulsa and Bowling Green are mid major, what does that make UConn, Rutgirls, Syrupcuse, Cincy, Duke, WF, Kansas, etc...? Clearly there is little to know competitive difference in these teams.

If you love the cusa schools so much, why dont you stay over at that board and stop trashing fellow BE programs.

Children must play, 'cuse.

The more you stir it, the worst it stinks!

cuseroc, you don't have to cry. It'll be alright? I don't trash all the BE programs, just the ones that suck like yours. I love the Big East, never said any different. Syrupcuse has a great tradition and they will be back one day. Won't it make it that much sweeter when you finally beat UofL and then you can look back with satisfatction at posts like this?

On the other hand, I only mentioned 3 C-USA schools in my post. Yes I do have a great respect for some of my schools traditional rivals from C-USA. But I have a greater appreciation for good football. And you never answered my question about what's the difference between those schools. You call them mid-majors like it's some type of cast system. Why aren't they just plain ole' football programs?

army56mike Wrote:cuseroc, you don't have to cry. It'll be alright? I don't trash all the BE programs, just the ones that suck like yours. I love the Big East, never said any different. Syrupcuse has a great tradition and they will be back one day. Won't it make it that much sweeter when you finally beat UofL and then you can look back with satisfatction at posts like this?

On the other hand, I only mentioned 3 C-USA schools in my post. Yes I do have a great respect for some of my schools traditional rivals from C-USA. But I have a greater appreciation for good football. And you never answered my question about what's the difference between those schools. You call them mid-majors like it's some type of cast system. Why aren't they just plain ole' football programs?

Noone is crying except you when you are remembering the good old days of cusa. Its just that you constantly berate SU, and Rutgers and Uconn. Did you berate Louisville when they were playing lousy fb? That wasnt so long ago, you know. It also wasnt so long ago when SU was sitting where Louisville is. I do agree with you, because SU will be fine.

Regarding your caste (notice the proper spelling) system comment, well it is a caste system. I did not make it that way, the bcs made it that way. Thats life.

This thread has descended into a pissing contest. He who drank the most pisses best. :drinky2:

1. I don't cry.
2. You finished your post by Waaaaah Waaaaahing.
3. There weren't any "good ole days" for C-USA as a conference.
4. I don't ever berate UConn.
5. Yes, I voiced my negatvie opinion when UofL was bad.

6. I look at teams based on individual competitiveness, not whether or not they are in a BCS conference.

3601 Wrote:

bitcruncher Wrote:

3601 Wrote:It's just a matter of time before we start seeing Stony Brook mentioned as a possible football member of the Big East.

It won't be posted by any BEast fan. It will probably come from one of the CUSA kibbutzers who come in here.

I've seen Big East fans mention Temple, Villanova, UMass, Delaware, Georgetown, and even William & Mary and Holy Cross. To me, Stony Brook isn't much more far fetched than some of those.

No, I've seen YOU posting stuff like that.

army56mike Wrote:If teams like UCF, Memphis, ECU, Fresno, Boise, Toledo, Tulsa and Bowling Green are mid major, what does that make UConn, Rutgirls, Syrupcuse, Cincy, Duke, WF, Kansas, etc...? Clearly there is little to know competitive difference in these teams.

You think you would be a little bit humble considering Louisville wasn't that long removed from winning 1 or two games or playing in a "mid-major" conference. In fact, it wasn't long ago when Memphis was destroying Louisville at Papa John's.

CatsClaw Wrote:

army56mike Wrote:If teams like UCF, Memphis, ECU, Fresno, Boise, Toledo, Tulsa and Bowling Green are mid major, what does that make UConn, Rutgirls, Syrupcuse, Cincy, Duke, WF, Kansas, etc...? Clearly there is little to know competitive difference in these teams.

You think you would be a little bit humble considering Louisville wasn't that long removed from winning 1 or two games or playing in a "mid-major" conference. In fact, it wasn't long ago when Memphis was destroying Louisville at Papa John's.

Cat, just ignore him. He is not even worth the internet space. Anyone that puts Cuse in the same category as Duke and Wake, well that tells you an awful lot about that poster.

David Krysakowski Wrote:Does anybody want to see this?

America East
Albany
Binghamton
Boston University
Hartford
Maine
Maryland at Baltimore County (UMBC)
Massachusetts
New Hampshire
Rhode Island
Stony Brook
Vermont

Atlantic 10
Charlotte
Duquesne
Fordham
George Washington
La Salle
Richmond
St. Bonaventure
St. Joseph's
Temple

Big East
Cincinnati
Connecticut
Louisville
Pittsburgh
Rutgers
South Florida
Syracuse
West Virginia

Catholic League
Butler
Dayton
De Paul
Georgetown
Marquette
Notre Dame
Providence
St. John's
St. Louis
Seton Hall
Valparaiso
Villanova
Xavier

add buffalo to big east than its a perfect 9team all sports conf.