Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)


Post Reply 
USA Today rankings after week 3.
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Louisianafanrcajun90 Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,890
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 30
I Root For: UL
Location: New Orleans
Post: #1
USA Today rankings after week 3.
http://www.usatoday.com/story/sports/nca...e/2820213/
Congrats to ASU on breaking the top 50. I hope you go undefeated until we get a hold of you.
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2013 05:50 PM by Louisianafanrcajun90.)
09-16-2013 05:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Franko Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 2,103
Joined: Mar 2009
Reputation: 50
I Root For: WKU
Location: Louisville, Ky
Post: #2
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
WKU in at 84, surprised. I was thinking 100+ since we have nothing to hang our hat on so to speak. 03-shhhh
09-16-2013 05:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,767
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1066
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #3
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 05:59 PM)Franko Wrote:  WKU in at 84, surprised. I was thinking 100+ since we have nothing to hang our hat on so to speak. 03-shhhh

Having a 70 ranking after week 1 helped you there...

USA Today must really think a lot of Troy to move us up 10 slots after a home conference win.
09-16-2013 06:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


TroyFootball05 Offline
1987 Man of the Year
*

Posts: 10,673
Joined: Feb 2009
Reputation: 585
I Root For: Good Times
Location: 8-Bit Pizza Bar
Post: #4
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 06:19 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 05:59 PM)Franko Wrote:  WKU in at 84, surprised. I was thinking 100+ since we have nothing to hang our hat on so to speak. 03-shhhh

Having a 70 ranking after week 1 helped you there...

USA Today must really think a lot of Troy to move us up 10 slots after a home conference win.

Looked like two evenly matched teams. 614 yards from Troy's offense, a game that was one play away from overtime, but 4 TOs sets us back in the 80s. It's ok. I think we're better than most think, but maybe not enough to share a title. Who knows though. All hinges on Bolt's defense (and cutting turnovers on offense).
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2013 06:26 PM by TroyFootball05.)
09-16-2013 06:25 PM
Visit this user's website Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,767
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1066
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #5
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 06:25 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:19 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 05:59 PM)Franko Wrote:  WKU in at 84, surprised. I was thinking 100+ since we have nothing to hang our hat on so to speak. 03-shhhh

Having a 70 ranking after week 1 helped you there...

USA Today must really think a lot of Troy to move us up 10 slots after a home conference win.

Looked like two evenly matched teams. 614 yards from Troy's offense, a game that was one play away from overtime, but 4 TOs sets us back in the 80s. It's ok. I think we're better than most think, but maybe not enough to share a title. Who knows though. All hinges on Bolt's defense (and cutting turnovers on offense).

Those early league games have really thrown things for a loop. While a team like ULL has not had the opportunity to prove itself against level competition, teams like Troy and Texas State have strong starts because they took advantage of playing and winning games against on level competition early.

Then you have a team like ASU, who just started league play 1-0 with a big win by all accounts, but now doesn't play another conference game for 5 weeks.

I think Troy is probably better than what most thought, but we really wont know for sure until they start playing other league competition.
09-16-2013 06:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Senatobia Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 443
Joined: Nov 2011
Reputation: 14
I Root For: stAte
Location:
Post: #6
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 06:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:25 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:19 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 05:59 PM)Franko Wrote:  WKU in at 84, surprised. I was thinking 100+ since we have nothing to hang our hat on so to speak. 03-shhhh

Having a 70 ranking after week 1 helped you there...

USA Today must really think a lot of Troy to move us up 10 slots after a home conference win.

Looked like two evenly matched teams. 614 yards from Troy's offense, a game that was one play away from overtime, but 4 TOs sets us back in the 80s. It's ok. I think we're better than most think, but maybe not enough to share a title. Who knows though. All hinges on Bolt's defense (and cutting turnovers on offense).

Those early league games have really thrown things for a loop. While a team like ULL has not had the opportunity to prove itself against level competition, teams like Troy and Texas State have strong starts because they took advantage of playing and winning games against on level competition early.

Then you have a team like ASU, who just started league play 1-0 with a big win by all accounts, but now doesn't play another conference game for 5 weeks.

I think Troy is probably better than what most thought, but we really wont know for sure until they start playing other league competition.

All I know is that Troy can damn sure move the pumpkin' down the field. Anybody with a half way suspect defense is in trouble.
(This post was last modified: 09-16-2013 07:02 PM by Senatobia.)
09-16-2013 07:01 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,767
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1066
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #7
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 07:01 PM)Senatobia Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:25 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:19 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 05:59 PM)Franko Wrote:  WKU in at 84, surprised. I was thinking 100+ since we have nothing to hang our hat on so to speak. 03-shhhh

Having a 70 ranking after week 1 helped you there...

USA Today must really think a lot of Troy to move us up 10 slots after a home conference win.

Looked like two evenly matched teams. 614 yards from Troy's offense, a game that was one play away from overtime, but 4 TOs sets us back in the 80s. It's ok. I think we're better than most think, but maybe not enough to share a title. Who knows though. All hinges on Bolt's defense (and cutting turnovers on offense).

Those early league games have really thrown things for a loop. While a team like ULL has not had the opportunity to prove itself against level competition, teams like Troy and Texas State have strong starts because they took advantage of playing and winning games against on level competition early.

Then you have a team like ASU, who just started league play 1-0 with a big win by all accounts, but now doesn't play another conference game for 5 weeks.

I think Troy is probably better than what most thought, but we really wont know for sure until they start playing other league competition.

All I know is that Troy can damn sure move the pumpkin' down the field. Anybody with a half way suspect defense is in trouble.

Outside of 2011, that's been true of Troy every year. Its their defense that is the difference between their championship teams, and their 6-6 teams.
09-16-2013 07:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Dedsquirrl Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 656
Joined: Nov 2010
Reputation: 38
I Root For: USA Jaguars
Location: Pensacola, FL
Post: #8
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
USA almost out of the triple digits.
09-16-2013 09:28 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Atlanta Trojan Offline
Sun Belt Nationalist
*

Posts: 12,801
Joined: Sep 2010
Reputation: 179
I Root For: TROY
Location: Senoia Ga
Post: #9
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 07:59 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 07:01 PM)Senatobia Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:25 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:19 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  Having a 70 ranking after week 1 helped you there...

USA Today must really think a lot of Troy to move us up 10 slots after a home conference win.

Looked like two evenly matched teams. 614 yards from Troy's offense, a game that was one play away from overtime, but 4 TOs sets us back in the 80s. It's ok. I think we're better than most think, but maybe not enough to share a title. Who knows though. All hinges on Bolt's defense (and cutting turnovers on offense).

Those early league games have really thrown things for a loop. While a team like ULL has not had the opportunity to prove itself against level competition, teams like Troy and Texas State have strong starts because they took advantage of playing and winning games against on level competition early.

Then you have a team like ASU, who just started league play 1-0 with a big win by all accounts, but now doesn't play another conference game for 5 weeks.

I think Troy is probably better than what most thought, but we really wont know for sure until they start playing other league competition.

All I know is that Troy can damn sure move the pumpkin' down the field. Anybody with a half way suspect defense is in trouble.

Outside of 2011, that's been true of Troy every year. Its their defense that is the difference between their championship teams, and their 6-6 teams.

In 2012, 6 of the 7 losses were by 7 points or fewer... And the 7th one we lost by 13 I believe.

We have to start winning these close games.
09-16-2013 09:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


chiefsfan Offline
No Seriously, they let me be a mod
*

Posts: 43,767
Joined: Sep 2007
Reputation: 1066
I Root For: ASU
Location:
Post: #10
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 09:45 PM)Atlanta Trojan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 07:59 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 07:01 PM)Senatobia Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:25 PM)TroyFootball05 Wrote:  Looked like two evenly matched teams. 614 yards from Troy's offense, a game that was one play away from overtime, but 4 TOs sets us back in the 80s. It's ok. I think we're better than most think, but maybe not enough to share a title. Who knows though. All hinges on Bolt's defense (and cutting turnovers on offense).

Those early league games have really thrown things for a loop. While a team like ULL has not had the opportunity to prove itself against level competition, teams like Troy and Texas State have strong starts because they took advantage of playing and winning games against on level competition early.

Then you have a team like ASU, who just started league play 1-0 with a big win by all accounts, but now doesn't play another conference game for 5 weeks.

I think Troy is probably better than what most thought, but we really wont know for sure until they start playing other league competition.

All I know is that Troy can damn sure move the pumpkin' down the field. Anybody with a half way suspect defense is in trouble.

Outside of 2011, that's been true of Troy every year. Its their defense that is the difference between their championship teams, and their 6-6 teams.

In 2012, 6 of the 7 losses were by 7 points or fewer... And the 7th one we lost by 13 I believe.

We have to start winning these close games.

Reminds me a lot of ASU under Roberts. We had considerable talent, but we lost so many close games (especially on the road) that it seemed like our players did not believe we could win a close game.

After we beat WKU in Bowling Green in 2011, it seemed that everything changed, and next thing you know we reeled off 8 straight league wins. We snuck around some close games with FIU and USA after the WKU loss in 2012, and suddenly it seemed the players knew they could beat anyone.

Losing is a mentality that is tough to replace. Troy is now at a point where most of its players were not around for the championships.
09-16-2013 09:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Arrowhead Offline
Beltbbs ULM INsider
*

Posts: 3,939
Joined: Jul 2004
Reputation: 190
I Root For: ULM
Location:
Post: #11
RE: USA Today rankings after week 3.
(09-16-2013 09:52 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 09:45 PM)Atlanta Trojan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 07:59 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 07:01 PM)Senatobia Wrote:  
(09-16-2013 06:46 PM)chiefsfan Wrote:  Those early league games have really thrown things for a loop. While a team like ULL has not had the opportunity to prove itself against level competition, teams like Troy and Texas State have strong starts because they took advantage of playing and winning games against on level competition early.

Then you have a team like ASU, who just started league play 1-0 with a big win by all accounts, but now doesn't play another conference game for 5 weeks.

I think Troy is probably better than what most thought, but we really wont know for sure until they start playing other league competition.

All I know is that Troy can damn sure move the pumpkin' down the field. Anybody with a half way suspect defense is in trouble.

Outside of 2011, that's been true of Troy every year. Its their defense that is the difference between their championship teams, and their 6-6 teams.

In 2012, 6 of the 7 losses were by 7 points or fewer... And the 7th one we lost by 13 I believe.

We have to start winning these close games.

Reminds me a lot of ASU under Roberts. We had considerable talent, but we lost so many close games (especially on the road) that it seemed like our players did not believe we could win a close game.

After we beat WKU in Bowling Green in 2011, it seemed that everything changed, and next thing you know we reeled off 8 straight league wins. We snuck around some close games with FIU and USA after the WKU loss in 2012, and suddenly it seemed the players knew they could beat anyone.

Losing is a mentality that is tough to replace. Troy is now at a point where most of its players were not around for the championships.

Wow, somewhat surprised ULM at 62. Ahead of Arkansas, WVU, and Mississippi St., etc. A State, your ranking is very impressive. I remember the SBC used to barely have anyone within the two digits.
09-16-2013 11:33 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.