memphis is now listed under old big east without even playing in the new big east because it now looks like there may be an even newer new big east, hmmmm. Either way shouldn't newest new big east now be listed in fcs section?

(02-28-2013 09:10 PM)nastar36 Wrote:  memphis is now listed under old big east without even playing in the new big east because it now looks like there may be an even newer new big east, hmmmm. Either way shouldn't newest new big east now be listed in fcs section?

Actually it shouldn't because its an active forum.

Would rather Memphis just moved back under it's own board, leave us as an independent or something, there's no conference here.

(02-28-2013 09:11 PM)ClairtonPanther Wrote:  

(02-28-2013 09:10 PM)nastar36 Wrote:  memphis is now listed under old big east without even playing in the new big east because it now looks like there may be an even newer new big east, hmmmm. Either way shouldn't newest new big east now be listed in fcs section?

Actually it shouldn't because its an active forum.

are all the other fcs conferences not active? idk, maybe they should be moved to the inactive section?

Here is a compromise:

We are the New Big East.

The C7 is the Old Big East.

old school baby....new version are too big of ******* to play football.

Maybe we should be Used to Be Big East