Jackson1011 Wrote:Wow...I don't know what is more suprising....an article out of ACC country bashing the BE or Cowboy Junky and Top Coug over here talking trash about it....this thread needs to be taken to the smack board...can't believe I wasted part of my lunch break reading it


Jackson

yeah i feel the same way, but honestly it was due. The trolls haven't been around much lately. Good to see the Big East still gets under their skin.

The CUSA morons have been quiet recently - - - I guess they've been embarrassed by the truly terrible performance of their league. Or, maybe they are all busy saying prayers of thanksgiving that the NCAA will not enforce an attendance requirement.

And as for the MWC, well, when your top team gets stomped by SMU then I guess most people would probably think twice before talking smack.

Cowboy Junky Wrote:This is exactly my point. You are a Rutgers fan. Rutgers has been the stomping boy for the Big East for years. Now, due to a lower level of competition, the loss of three top 20 teams and replacing them with two division 1aa teams, Cincinnatti, and an always over-rated Louisville team, you suddenly think Rutgers has made some great strides forward. You're Rutgers. You suck. You always have sucked. You always will suck. It's what comes with being Rutgers.

This is what the world sees. Rutgers and two division 1aa teams are competing for the Big East title. The Big East's biggest win this year was an average Maryland team. Someone has to play in a BCS game at the end of the year. That's when your skirt is really going to come up and show your vajina to everyone.

That's funny the media while blasting the conference has been kissing Rutgers' ****** all week. Hell when you've got the ESPN Gameday crew giving a Rutgers player an award Sunday and saying yeah they're going bowling and not laughing or being sarcastic. Rutgers was poised to turn the corner sooner or later. You're program has no recruiting base and should be 1-AA like Montana. We have a recruiting base in our backyard to easily support us. I'd love to play your sorry program and gasp pummel you. Yes the Rutgers fan will indeed talk smack because you know what, I know our guys can run circles around yours.

Cowboy Junky Wrote:This is exactly my point. You are a Rutgers fan. Rutgers has been the stomping boy for the Big East for years. Now, due to a lower level of competition, the loss of three top 20 teams and replacing them with two division 1aa teams, Cincinnatti, and an always over-rated Louisville team, you suddenly think Rutgers has made some great strides forward. You're Rutgers. You suck. You always have sucked. You always will suck. It's what comes with being Rutgers.

This is what the world sees. Rutgers and two division 1aa teams are competing for the Big East title. The Big East's biggest win this year was an average Maryland team. Someone has to play in a BCS game at the end of the year. That's when your skirt is really going to come up and show your vajina to everyone.

i think it's time for you and the horse you rode in on to mosey on over to greener pastures.

Cowboy Junky Wrote:This is exactly what the author of that article and I myself am talking about. When you are pinning your hopes of conference superiority on Rutgers(Bwahaaahaaa), two division 1aa teams, and the castaways on Gilligans Island, maybe your conference isn't as good as you think it is. When you're 0-9 against the top 50. When you've only got 4 wins against the BCS ooc and three of them came from the same team. When you've beat Buffalo three times ooc. When you have one team in the top 25, although you've set up the system to spot you 10 spots with voting blocks. Maybe, just maybe, it's time you realize the only reason you are still a part of the BCS is because you have lots of t.v. sets in your home cities. Congratulations on being blessed with lots of t.v. sets.

The BE has 2 wins against the top 50 idiot. That shows that you really dont have anything when you have to make things up sonny.

I would rather lose to any bcs top 50 than to lose to a sunbelt teamas some of your teams have done. Will the mwc have more than 3 bowl eligible teams this season?

I notice that everyone of your comments talks about tv sets. Is that all the ammo that you have? If only the tv sets keeps us in the bcs, as you say, then what makes you think we will lose the bcs? idiot. :laugh:

How do I put this?

SMU 24 TCU 10

Texas A&M 66 SMU 8
UTEP 55 SMU 21
Rice 44 SMU 10

TCU 24 Utah 21

WOW WHAT A CONFERENCE!

And for the record, UTEP joined the C-USA to hook up with the Texas schools. They are NOT joining the MWC. Good thing too; they have a good school in both academics and athletics.