MG61
Heisman
Posts: 5,137
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 79
I Root For: UNT
Location:
|
Pre Snap read - Survival = WACs Leading Goal
But just look at what the WAC will have in 2012, as the league currently stands: Idaho, Louisiana Tech, New Mexico State, San Jose State, Utah State, Texas-San Antonio and Texas State. The latter pair transition to the WAC from the F.C.S.; U.T.-San Antonio is only now transitioning to college football, having recently christened its program under the direction of former Miami (Fla.) coach Larry Coker.
So what happens to the WAC? One thing is clear: this will be the worst conference in college football. That’s not news. But let’s not draw the curtain on the WAC just yet, throwing out a league that still has a future, albeit not a bright one.
FULL ARTICLE
http://www.presnapread.com/survival-is-w...more-22545
|
|
06-19-2011 09:40 AM |
|
pilot172000
All American
Posts: 4,626
Joined: Apr 2011
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Tech/ Bama
Location: North Louisiana
|
RE: Pre Snap read - Survival = WACs Leading Goal
What's with all these WAC sucks articles? Duh! But last I checked almost all non BCS Conferences have issues. That part of being a non AQ conference.
|
|
06-19-2011 11:01 AM |
|
BlueRaiderFan.
1st String
Posts: 2,223
Joined: May 2010
Reputation: 92
I Root For: Middle Tennesse
Location:
|
RE: Pre Snap read - Survival = WACs Leading Goal
(06-19-2011 11:01 AM)pilot172000 Wrote: What's with all these WAC sucks articles? Duh! But last I checked almost all non BCS Conferences have issues. That part of being a non AQ conference.
Because your conference is going to be in a very bad state...not just sort of bad...BAD.
|
|
06-19-2011 12:10 PM |
|
laxtonto
1st String
Posts: 1,212
Joined: Mar 2010
Reputation: 20
I Root For: LAX
Location:
|
RE: Pre Snap read - Survival = WACs Leading Goal
(06-19-2011 11:01 AM)pilot172000 Wrote: What's with all these WAC sucks articles? Duh! But last I checked almost all non BCS Conferences have issues. That part of being a non AQ conference.
Very simply, the WAC sucks articles keep popping up because the WAC meetings are over and the best the WAC could do was bring in Seattle U. This leads to two thought lines..
1. How many teams have turned down the WAC, and
2. If Seattle U is the best the WAC can do, how do they stay intact when the WAC is on very shaking ground in the areas of bowl bids, TV revenue and NCAA approval.
Make no bones about it, the WAC is one move away from collapse. The question really is will other conference try to kill the WAC and more importantly will the NCAA continue to help the WAC due to the need for a low-tier conference in the SW.
|
|
06-19-2011 12:34 PM |
|
TodgeRodge
All American
Posts: 4,936
Joined: Jun 2010
Reputation: 264
I Root For: Todge
Location: Westlake
|
RE: Pre Snap read - Survival = WACs Leading Goal
(06-19-2011 11:01 AM)pilot172000 Wrote: What's with all these WAC sucks articles? Duh! But last I checked almost all non BCS Conferences have issues. That part of being a non AQ conference.
it is what happens when bottom feeders think they can feed on one of their own
funny thing is the WAC will still be better than the belt this year I am sure and the year after that is a LONG way off for anyone counting on becoming the second worst conference out there VS the worst (especially when they are counting on others collapse to fuel their "advancement" VS any of their own accomplishments)
|
|
06-19-2011 03:39 PM |
|
arkstfan
Sorry folks
Posts: 25,850
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 986
I Root For: Fresh Starts
Location:
|
RE: Pre Snap read - Survival = WACs Leading Goal
(06-19-2011 11:01 AM)pilot172000 Wrote: What's with all these WAC sucks articles? Duh! But last I checked almost all non BCS Conferences have issues. That part of being a non AQ conference.
Because there are only two storylines for the leagues outside the spotlight.
Hot and rising league.
About to collapse.
|
|
06-19-2011 06:40 PM |
|