DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
Probably b/c they're self-selected that way
If you require people to find "proof" of globlal warming in order to keep their job, odds are you'll get proof.
I think they call this "economics".
Quote:All:
Please distribute this announcement for a tenure track assistant professor position in Global Change Geology at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. If you'd like to know more about the position, feel free to call me at 217-244-2002.
Apologies for the cross-posting...
-Tom Johnson (Search Committee Chair)
************************************************
Thomas M. Johnson
Associate Professor
Dept. of Geology, MC-102
253 Natural History Bldg.
1301 W. Green St.
University of Illinois
Urbana, IL 61801
http://www.geology.uiuc.edu/people/tmjohnsn/index.html
Phone (217) 244-2002
FAX (217) 244-4996
************************************************
Full-Time Tenure-Track Assistant Professor, Global Change Geology
The Department of Geology in the School of Earth, Society, and Environment at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is searching for a full-time, tenure-track assistant professor in the broadly defined area of Global Change Geology. Examples of relevant research areas include but are not limited to:
1. The global carbon cycle, including connections to the deep Earth, weathering, and carbon sequestration.
2. Paleoclimatology, isotope geochemistry, and other studies of environmental change records.
3. Studies of Earth materials and elements (e.g., clathrates, nitrogen, iron, sulfur) related to climate and the evolution of life.
4. Glaciology and other earth science studies of modern environmental change.
Applicants must have a Ph.D. and demonstrate the potential to establish an internationally recognized, externally funded research program. An ability to contribute to excellence in education at the graduate and undergraduate levels in geosciences, and in interdisciplinary aspects of the School of Earth, Society and the Environment, is also required.
Starting Date: August 16, 2011. Salary is commensurate with background and experience.
To ensure full consideration, please create your candidate profile through https://jobs.illinois.edu/ and upload a curriculum vita including a full list of publications and a description of research and teaching interests, pdf reprints or preprints of publications, and contact information for at least three references. Full consideration will be given to applications received by October 12, 2010. Inquiries about the position are encouraged; contact Prof. Johnson 217-244-2002; tmjohnsn@illinois.edu
|
|
09-10-2010 10:38 AM |
|
Lord Stanley
L'Étoile du Nord
Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
So what does a position like this pay?
|
|
09-10-2010 10:59 AM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
(09-10-2010 10:59 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote: So what does a position like this pay?
I could hazard a guess, but I'll refrain for now.
You might find a similar position and research it here
http://www.buckeyeinstitute.org/osu-salary
|
|
09-10-2010 11:05 AM |
|
Machiavelli
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
Hey Torch.
Why don't you submit a paper for peer review.
Here's a link with the general criteria.
All of our peer-reviewed journals are bi-annual (Fall and Spring). There are no deadlines for submissions. We do not accept letters of inquiry, abstracts or topic proposals. Please submit your finished work for peer review. The length of a manuscript can be up to 50 pages long including tables, graphs, diagrams, photographs, and equations.
http://www.scientificjournals.org/submission.htm
You could use your vast knowledge and all of your credible sources. I'm thinking you could even start up your own climatefraud.com. This seems like an area that you've taken great interest in. I'll be waiting on pins and needles. Let me know when you are published.
|
|
09-10-2010 11:58 AM |
|
DrTorch
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
(09-10-2010 11:58 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hey Torch.
Why don't you submit a paper for peer review.
Here's a link with the general criteria.
All of our peer-reviewed journals are bi-annual (Fall and Spring). There are no deadlines for submissions. We do not accept letters of inquiry, abstracts or topic proposals. Please submit your finished work for peer review. The length of a manuscript can be up to 50 pages long including tables, graphs, diagrams, photographs, and equations.
http://www.scientificjournals.org/submission.htm
You could use your vast knowledge and all of your credible sources. I'm thinking you could even start up your own climatefraud.com. This seems like an area that you've taken great interest in. I'll be waiting on pins and needles. Let me know when you are published.
Are you offering to fund me?
|
|
09-10-2010 12:08 PM |
|
Machiavelli
Back to Reality. Oh there goes Gravity
Posts: 25,357
Joined: Apr 2006
I Root For: BGSU
Location:
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
You don't need my money. Write in to Exxon-Mobil for a grant with your research. They have deeper pockets.
|
|
09-10-2010 12:09 PM |
|
Bull_In_Exile
Eternal Pessimist
Posts: 21,809
Joined: Jun 2009
Reputation: 461
I Root For: The Underdog
Location:
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
(09-10-2010 11:58 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hey Torch.
Why don't you submit a paper for peer review.
Here's a link with the general criteria.
All of our peer-reviewed journals are bi-annual (Fall and Spring). There are no deadlines for submissions. We do not accept letters of inquiry, abstracts or topic proposals. Please submit your finished work for peer review. The length of a manuscript can be up to 50 pages long including tables, graphs, diagrams, photographs, and equations.
http://www.scientificjournals.org/submission.htm
You could use your vast knowledge and all of your credible sources. I'm thinking you could even start up your own climatefraud.com. This seems like an area that you've taken great interest in. I'll be waiting on pins and needles. Let me know when you are published.
Trying to put anything counter culture in an AGW peer review is like being a rangers fan at a Flyers game... Thanks to the politics of AGW there is no more peer review in that field, just a one position circle jerk..
|
|
09-10-2010 12:29 PM |
|
Owl 69/70/75
Just an old rugby coach
Posts: 80,770
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3208
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
(09-10-2010 12:29 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: (09-10-2010 11:58 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hey Torch.
Why don't you submit a paper for peer review.
Here's a link with the general criteria.
All of our peer-reviewed journals are bi-annual (Fall and Spring). There are no deadlines for submissions. We do not accept letters of inquiry, abstracts or topic proposals. Please submit your finished work for peer review. The length of a manuscript can be up to 50 pages long including tables, graphs, diagrams, photographs, and equations.
http://www.scientificjournals.org/submission.htm
You could use your vast knowledge and all of your credible sources. I'm thinking you could even start up your own climatefraud.com. This seems like an area that you've taken great interest in. I'll be waiting on pins and needles. Let me know when you are published.
Trying to put anything counter culture in an AGW peer review is like being a rangers fan at a Flyers game... Thanks to the politics of AGW there is no more peer review in that field, just a one position circle jerk..
Galileo and Copernicus couldn't have gotten published in peer reviewed journals in their day, but that didn't make either one of them wrong.
|
|
09-10-2010 01:13 PM |
|
NIU007
Legend
Posts: 34,252
Joined: Sep 2004
Reputation: 318
I Root For: NIU, MAC
Location: Naperville, IL
|
RE: Why do so many academicians believe in AGW?
(09-10-2010 01:13 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote: (09-10-2010 12:29 PM)Bull_In_Exile Wrote: (09-10-2010 11:58 AM)Machiavelli Wrote: Hey Torch.
Why don't you submit a paper for peer review.
Here's a link with the general criteria.
All of our peer-reviewed journals are bi-annual (Fall and Spring). There are no deadlines for submissions. We do not accept letters of inquiry, abstracts or topic proposals. Please submit your finished work for peer review. The length of a manuscript can be up to 50 pages long including tables, graphs, diagrams, photographs, and equations.
http://www.scientificjournals.org/submission.htm
You could use your vast knowledge and all of your credible sources. I'm thinking you could even start up your own climatefraud.com. This seems like an area that you've taken great interest in. I'll be waiting on pins and needles. Let me know when you are published.
Trying to put anything counter culture in an AGW peer review is like being a rangers fan at a Flyers game... Thanks to the politics of AGW there is no more peer review in that field, just a one position circle jerk..
Galileo and Copernicus couldn't have gotten published in peer reviewed journals in their day, but that didn't make either one of them wrong.
They probably had more worry about whether their lives were going to be threatened if they published, than whether or not they could publish.
|
|
09-16-2010 05:27 PM |
|