Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
Unmasking Obama
Author Message
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #1
Unmasking Obama
The pussyfooting president.

The Unmasking of Barack Obama

December 1st, 2009 By PETER WEHNER,


[Image: 51tuis-picL._SS500_.jpg]
Obama’s Ineptitude is being revealed

The overseas reviews for President Obama’s foreign policy are starting to pour in — and they’re not favorable. Bob Ainsworth, the British defense secretary, has blamed Obama for the decline in British public support for the war in Afghanistan. According to the Telegraph:

Mr. Ainsworth took the unprecedented step of publicly criticizing the U.S. President and his delays in sending more troops to bolster the mission against the Taliban. A “period of hiatus” in Washington — and a lack of clear direction — had made it harder for ministers to persuade the British public to go on backing the Afghan mission in the face of a rising death toll, he said. Senior British Government sources have become increasingly frustrated with Mr. Obama’s “dithering” on Afghanistan, the Daily Telegraph disclosed earlier this month, with several former British defense chiefs echoing the concerns.

The President is “Obama the Impotent,” according to Steven Hill of the Guardian. The Economist calls Obama the “Pacific (and pussyfooting) president.” The Financial Times refers to “relations between the U.S. and Europe, which started the year of talks as allies, near breakdown.” The German magazine Der Spiegel accuses the president of being “dishonest with Europe” on the subject of climate change. Another withering piece in Der Spiegel, titled “Obama’s Nice Guy Act Gets Him Nowhere on the World Stage,” lists the instances in which Obama is being rolled. The Jerusalem Post puts it this way: “Everybody is saying no to the American president these days. And it’s not just that they’re saying no, it’s also the way they’re saying no.” “He talks too much,” a Saudi academic who had once been smitten with Barack Obama tells the Middle East scholar Fouad Ajami. The Saudi “has wearied of Mr. Obama and now does not bother with the Obama oratory,” according to Ajami. But “he is hardly alone, this academic. In the endless chatter of this region, and in the commentaries offered by the press, the theme is one of disappointment. In the Arab-Islamic world, Barack Obama has come down to earth.”

Indeed he has — and only Obama and his increasingly clueless administration seem unaware of this.

On almost every front, progress is nonexistent. In many instances, things are getting worse rather than better. The enormous goodwill that Obama’s election was met with hasn’t been leveraged into anything useful and tangible. Rather, our allies are now questioning America’s will, while our adversaries are becoming increasingly emboldened. The United States looks weak and uncertain. It’s “amateur hour at the White House,” according to Leslie Gelb, president emeritus of the Council on Foreign Relations and a former official in the Carter administration. “Not only are things not getting fixed, they may be getting more broken,” according to Michael Hirsh at Newsweek. When even such strong Obama supporters as Gelb and Hirsh reach these conclusions, you know things must be unraveling.

It’s no mystery as to why. President Obama’s approach to international relations is simplistic and misguided. It is premised on the belief that American concessions to our adversaries will beget goodwill and concessions in return; that American self-abasement is justified; that the American decline is inevitable (and in some respects welcome); and that diplomacy and multilateralism are ends rather than means to an end.

Right now the overwhelming issue on the public’s mind is the economy, where Obama is also having serious problems. But national-security issues matter a great deal, and they remain the unique responsibility of the president. With every passing month, Barack Obama looks more and more like his Democratic predecessor Jimmy Carter: irresolute, unsteady, and overmatched. The president and members of his own party will find out soon enough, though, that Obama the Impotent isn’t what they had in mind when they elected him. We are witnessing the unmasking, and perhaps the unmaking, of Barack Obama.
(This post was last modified: 12-01-2009 06:52 PM by SumOfAllFears.)
12-01-2009 06:47 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #2
RE: Unmasking Obama
Sounds like his inexperience and ineptitude are being exposed. Aren't you glad the O is the one who will be answering the phone at 3:00am when a crisis arises?
12-01-2009 06:59 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Claw Online
Legend
*

Posts: 25,002
Joined: Feb 2004
Reputation: 1233
I Root For: Memphis
Location: Orangeville HELP!
Post: #3
RE: Unmasking Obama
I was expecting an anti-Christ thread.
12-01-2009 07:21 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #4
RE: Unmasking Obama
I'm tired living in a place where this is "news" to people who vote.

This was discussed ad nauseum by intelligent people, well before the elections.
12-02-2009 10:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #5
RE: Unmasking Obama
Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections. Maybe you missed the Lame Stream Media's accounts. Waiting.......
12-02-2009 11:52 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Ninerfan1 Offline
Habitual Line Stepper
*

Posts: 9,871
Joined: Mar 2004
Reputation: 146
I Root For: Charlotte
Location:
Post: #6
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections. Maybe you missed the Lame Stream Media's accounts. Waiting.......

Read his statement again.

Quote:This was discussed ad nauseum by intelligent people, well before the elections.

Using the adjective intelligent rules out the media.

I said this in another thread. America and the world are seeing what those of us who didn't get caught up in the "story" of Obama saw all throughout the election. He's weak and incompetent and disaster would follow with his election. We're seeing it play out daily.
(This post was last modified: 12-03-2009 08:47 AM by Ninerfan1.)
12-03-2009 08:43 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #7
RE: Unmasking Obama
Unfortunately, roughly half of America still believes at this point. My guess is that the next six months will see that number continue to erode. By next fall's elections, I'm guessing he'll be around 40% approval and most, if not all, of the democrats running in hotly-contested congressional elections will be saying, "Obama stay away," during their campaigns. I can see republicans running very effective ads saying, "A vote for (democrat candidate) is a vote for Obama," or even better "for Nancy Pelosi."

Some time around 2011, I'm guessing he'll be around 35% and top democrats will start believing they need somebody else in 2012. Hillary will, of course, be available. Who knows who will be the republican candidate. This is not a pretty picture, particularly considering what life will be like for us to get there.
12-03-2009 08:55 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Lord Stanley Offline
L'Étoile du Nord
*

Posts: 19,103
Joined: Feb 2005
Reputation: 994
I Root For: NIU
Location: Cold. So cold......
Post: #8
RE: Unmasking Obama
Is not his fall from grace seriously amazing?

He was annointed to the Presidency by a large majority of Americans who did honestly feel his Hope 'n Change.

And just 12 months later, many of the same voters + the opposition are hastening his probable collapse.

The review of his Presidency and Administration by honest historians in 100 years will be facinating. Much more facinating than GHB and WJC, and probably on par with GWB.

Why do I have to die when so many cool things will happen in the future, damn it!
12-03-2009 11:27 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #9
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-03-2009 11:27 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  Is not his fall from grace seriously amazing?

His fall from grace is not being noticed by the typical democrat voter. Liberals I know still think he's the greatest thing since sliced bread. Look at Barbara Boxer in CA. She's done nothing yet she's consistently re-elected. It seems a lot of people vote by what a politician says s/he'll do rather than their actual records.

Quote:Barbara Boxer has sponsored 420 bills since Feb 4, 1991 of which 355 haven't made it out of committee and 13 were successfully enacted. Boxer has co-sponsored 2018 bills during the same time period. (The count of enacted bills considers only bills actually sponsored by Boxer and companion bills identified by CRS that were themselves enacted, but not if they were incorporated into other bills, as that information is not readily available.)

Some of Boxer’s most recently sponsored bills include...

S.Res. 292: A resolution congratulating the Park View All-Star Little League team for winning the 2009 Little League World Series championship.
S.Res. 265: A resolution honoring the firefighters who sacrificed their lives while battling the Station Fire in southern California in August 2009.
S. 1754: Home Office Deduction Simplification Act of 2009
S. 2079: A bill to reduce temporarily the duty on acai, uncooked or cooked by steaming or boiling in water, frozen, whether or not containing added sugar or other sweetening matter.
S. 2080: A bill to suspend temporarily the duty on hand blown glass vases.


http://www.govtrack.us/congress/person.xpd?id=300011
12-03-2009 11:46 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


SumOfAllFears Offline
Grim Reaper of Misguided Liberal Souls
*

Posts: 18,213
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation: 58
I Root For: America
Location:
Post: #10
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-03-2009 08:43 AM)Ninerfan1 Wrote:  
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections. Maybe you missed the Lame Stream Media's accounts. Waiting.......

Read his statement again.

Quote:This was discussed ad nauseum by intelligent people, well before the elections.

Using the adjective intelligent rules out the media.

I said this in another thread. America and the world are seeing what those of us who didn't get caught up in the "story" of Obama saw all throughout the election. He's weak and incompetent and disaster would follow with his election. We're seeing it play out daily.

oops, sorry torch.

Obama's Ineptitude, his incompetence is so blatant, so pronounced leaving such a vivid impression on the mind that is going to haunt Americans for decades. The stereotype of blacks... You could throw a rock and hit somebody more able to lead than Obama, in Montana.
12-03-2009 12:17 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #11
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections.

Here.

Sure the MSM blew it. That's why I'm sick of stupid, uninformed people voting.
12-03-2009 12:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,356
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #12
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-03-2009 12:45 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections.

Here.

Sure the MSM blew it. That's why I'm sick of stupid, uninformed people voting.

How would you determine, at registration, who is as smart as you are?

But you know what didn't help keep Obama out of office? It was the mixture of your informed members and those who are on your side who just stood by totally untrue statements. Those people who represented the latter outweighed the former just because they were the loudest. We need sensible people to start to be louder.
12-03-2009 07:37 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #13
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-03-2009 07:37 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(12-03-2009 12:45 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections.

Here.

Sure the MSM blew it. That's why I'm sick of stupid, uninformed people voting.

How would you determine, at registration, who is as smart as you are?

I think landowners and veterans should have the vote.

Civil servants should lose the vote at the level where they "serve." That is, Fed employees can vote in state/local elections, but not federal. State employees can vote in Fed elections, but not state.
12-04-2009 09:54 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,356
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #14
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-04-2009 09:54 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-03-2009 07:37 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(12-03-2009 12:45 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections.

Here.

Sure the MSM blew it. That's why I'm sick of stupid, uninformed people voting.

How would you determine, at registration, who is as smart as you are?

I think landowners and veterans should have the vote.

Civil servants should lose the vote at the level where they "serve." That is, Fed employees can vote in state/local elections, but not federal. State employees can vote in Fed elections, but not state.

So National Guardsmen will vote in neither state or federal elections
12-04-2009 10:26 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DrTorch Offline
Proved mach and GTS to be liars
*

Posts: 35,887
Joined: Jun 2002
Reputation: 201
I Root For: ASU, BGSU
Location:

CrappiesDonatorsBalance of Power Contest
Post: #15
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-04-2009 10:26 AM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(12-04-2009 09:54 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-03-2009 07:37 PM)nomad2u2001 Wrote:  
(12-03-2009 12:45 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections.

Here.

Sure the MSM blew it. That's why I'm sick of stupid, uninformed people voting.

How would you determine, at registration, who is as smart as you are?

I think landowners and veterans should have the vote.

Civil servants should lose the vote at the level where they "serve." That is, Fed employees can vote in state/local elections, but not federal. State employees can vote in Fed elections, but not state.

So National Guardsmen will vote in neither state or federal elections

No, those restrictions shouldn't apply to active duty personnel.
12-04-2009 11:00 AM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
smn1256 Offline
I miss Tripster
*

Posts: 28,878
Joined: Apr 2008
Reputation: 337
I Root For: Lower taxes
Location: North Mexico
Post: #16
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-04-2009 09:54 AM)DrTorch Wrote:  I think landowners and veterans should have the vote.

Civil servants should lose the vote at the level where they "serve." That is, Fed employees can vote in state/local elections, but not federal. State employees can vote in Fed elections, but not state.

I could go along with this, but you know the left is going to scream because the inner-city Welfare tenement dwellers would never get to vote with the exceptions of the few vets who might live there and we all know which way they vote....when they actually do.
12-05-2009 09:43 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
RobertN Offline
Legend
*

Posts: 35,485
Joined: Jan 2003
Reputation: 95
I Root For: THE NIU Huskies
Location: Wayne's World
Post: #17
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-03-2009 12:45 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  
(12-02-2009 11:52 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Where was Obama’s Ineptitude discussed ad nauseum well before the elections.

Here.

Sure the MSM blew it. That's why I'm sick of stupid, uninformed people voting.
Totally agree Torchy. You should NEVER vote again.
12-05-2009 11:31 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Advertisement


Owl 69/70/75 Offline
Just an old rugby coach
*

Posts: 80,854
Joined: Sep 2005
Reputation: 3214
I Root For: RiceBathChelsea
Location: Montgomery, TX

DonatorsNew Orleans Bowl
Post: #18
RE: Unmasking Obama
Obama is terrible.
Shrub was terrible.
McCain would have been terrible if he had beaten Obama.
None of the republican front-runners for 2012 show much to inspire either.
There is very little reason for hope.
12-05-2009 11:42 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
nomad2u2001 Offline
Hall of Famer
*

Posts: 18,356
Joined: Nov 2006
Reputation: 450
I Root For: ECU
Location: NC
Post: #19
RE: Unmasking Obama
(12-05-2009 11:42 PM)Owl 69/70/75 Wrote:  Obama is terrible.
Shrub was terrible.
McCain would have been terrible if he had beaten Obama.
None of the republican front-runners for 2012 show much to inspire either.
There is very little reason for hope.

That's exactly what happens when you water down the quality of your leadership by having two powerful factions running the entire country.
12-06-2009 02:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.