The bottom one, obviously. It's vertical. The other two are horizontal.

Now come on, that's clever!

There is some pretty good anti-Obama gear out there, with sales increasing.

anyway, the Obama sticker doesnt' belong, to answer my own question. How many cars have all 3 though, mistakenly thinking they go together?

I've never been able to wrap my head around the bumper sticker that says:

Obama’s Moral-Leadership Balloon Crashes
Realpolitik and misplaced faith in diplomacy keeps trumping human rights.

Quote:Global human rights, morality, and justice took a “great leap forward” (as Anita Dunn’s favorite political philosopher might say) on January 20. But in the space of just nine months, the Obama administration has betrayed the cause of human rights around the globe.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped set the tone in February by swatting away a question about human rights abuses in China. Those issues, she said, “can’t interfere with the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis, and the security crisis.” Political prisoners, Tibetans, and religious minorities may have been dejected by this stony dismissal, but the Chinese government was delighted. “This type of realistic attitude could be followed by other Western leaders,” an official newspaper noted with satisfaction.

-----

But surely on a matter as grave as mass murder, President Obama will not permit realpolitik or misplaced faith in diplomacy to trump human rights? Who can forget Senator Obama’s eloquent condemnation of the Bush administration for negotiating with the Sudanese regime? “I am deeply concerned,” candidate Obama intoned, “by reports that the Bush administration is negotiating a normalization of relations with the Government of Sudan that would include removing it from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. . . . This reckless and cynical initiative would reward a regime in Khartoum that has a record of failing to live up to its commitments. . . . Before we improve our relationship with the government of Sudan, conditions must improve for the Sudanese people. We cannot stand down — we must continue to stand up for peace and human rights.” Why did the senator feel so strongly about it? Because “the United States has a moral obligation, anytime you see humanitarian catastrophes. . . . And when you see a genocide, whether it’s in Rwanda, or Bosnia, or in Darfur, that’s a stain on all of us; that’s a stain on our souls.”

How are our souls looking today? On Monday, the Washington Post reported that that the U.S. “will shift its policy toward Sudan to one based on working with the country’s government instead of isolating it.” Whereas he had once demanded that “the international community must, over the Sudanese regime’s protests, deploy a large, capable U.N.-led and U.N.-funded force with a robust enforcement mandate to stop the killings,” the president now says that “if the government of Sudan acts to improve the situation on the ground and to advance peace, there will be incentives; if it does not, then there will be increased pressure imposed by the United States and the international community.” Incentives? For Omar al-Bashir, the only head of state currently under indictment by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity? That threat of “increased pressure” must really terrify him. It’s the fierce urgency of the kow tow.

Finally, by joining the Human Rights Committee of the U.N., President Obama has granted U.S. prestige to the howling claque of Israel and America bashers.

(10-20-2009 10:12 AM)GGniner Wrote:  There is some pretty good anti-Obama gear out there, with sales increasing.

anyway, the Obama sticker doesnt' belong, to answer my own question. How many cars have all 3 though, mistakenly thinking they go together?

I agree. You whackos are buying all kinds of guns and ammo(ie anti-Obama gear).

(10-20-2009 10:34 AM)Lord Stanley Wrote:  I've never been able to wrap my head around the bumper sticker that says:

Thats ok. You are a Republican, that is normal for you in many instances not just this one.

(10-20-2009 11:06 AM)GGniner Wrote:  Obama’s Moral-Leadership Balloon Crashes
Realpolitik and misplaced faith in diplomacy keeps trumping human rights.

Quote:Global human rights, morality, and justice took a “great leap forward” (as Anita Dunn’s favorite political philosopher might say) on January 20. But in the space of just nine months, the Obama administration has betrayed the cause of human rights around the globe.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton helped set the tone in February by swatting away a question about human rights abuses in China. Those issues, she said, “can’t interfere with the global economic crisis, the global climate change crisis, and the security crisis.” Political prisoners, Tibetans, and religious minorities may have been dejected by this stony dismissal, but the Chinese government was delighted. “This type of realistic attitude could be followed by other Western leaders,” an official newspaper noted with satisfaction.

-----

But surely on a matter as grave as mass murder, President Obama will not permit realpolitik or misplaced faith in diplomacy to trump human rights? Who can forget Senator Obama’s eloquent condemnation of the Bush administration for negotiating with the Sudanese regime? “I am deeply concerned,” candidate Obama intoned, “by reports that the Bush administration is negotiating a normalization of relations with the Government of Sudan that would include removing it from the list of state sponsors of terrorism. . . . This reckless and cynical initiative would reward a regime in Khartoum that has a record of failing to live up to its commitments. . . . Before we improve our relationship with the government of Sudan, conditions must improve for the Sudanese people. We cannot stand down — we must continue to stand up for peace and human rights.” Why did the senator feel so strongly about it? Because “the United States has a moral obligation, anytime you see humanitarian catastrophes. . . . And when you see a genocide, whether it’s in Rwanda, or Bosnia, or in Darfur, that’s a stain on all of us; that’s a stain on our souls.”

How are our souls looking today? On Monday, the Washington Post reported that that the U.S. “will shift its policy toward Sudan to one based on working with the country’s government instead of isolating it.” Whereas he had once demanded that “the international community must, over the Sudanese regime’s protests, deploy a large, capable U.N.-led and U.N.-funded force with a robust enforcement mandate to stop the killings,” the president now says that “if the government of Sudan acts to improve the situation on the ground and to advance peace, there will be incentives; if it does not, then there will be increased pressure imposed by the United States and the international community.” Incentives? For Omar al-Bashir, the only head of state currently under indictment by the International Criminal Court for crimes against humanity? That threat of “increased pressure” must really terrify him. It’s the fierce urgency of the kow tow.

Finally, by joining the Human Rights Committee of the U.N., President Obama has granted U.S. prestige to the howling claque of Israel and America bashers.

She is just upset that we didn't go over and start killing the people of Sudan.