and not in catostrophic mode like Liberal areas....that darn Free Market stuff.

Thomas Sowell explains here:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonkno...BiNTNlYTE=

(07-14-2009 12:00 PM)GGniner Wrote:  and not in catostrophic mode like Liberal areas....that darn Free Market stuff.

Thomas Sowell explains here:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonkno...BiNTNlYTE=

The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

All this means is that libs will move in and "fix" things.

Sorry, I'm still not over my astronomical tax bills from moving back to MD.

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

That right there shows why everyone thinks you're a fuken moron. They haven't had negative growth in any decade since it was founded.

1860 678
—
1870 3,000 342.5%
1880 10,358 245.3%
1890 38,067 267.5%
1900 42,639 12.0%
1910 92,104 116.0%
1920 158,976 72.6%
1930 260,475 63.8%
1940 294,734 13.2%
1950 434,462 47.4%
1960 679,684 56.4%
1970 844,401 24.2%
1980 904,078 7.1%
1990 1,006,877 11.4%
2000 1,188,580 18.0%
Est. 2009 1,306,350 9.9%

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:00 PM)GGniner Wrote:  and not in catostrophic mode like Liberal areas....that darn Free Market stuff.

Thomas Sowell explains here:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonkno...BiNTNlYTE=

The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there.

Quote:Dallas (pronounced /ˈdæləs/) is the third largest city in the state of Texas after Houston and San Antonio and the eighth-largest in the United States.[4] As of July 1, 2009, CNN Money reported Dallas edged past San Diego (pop. 1,279,329) back into the 8th spot, with a population of 1,279,910.[5]

With an estimated population nearing 1.3 million,[1][6] the city is the main economic center of the 12-county Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington metropolitan area that according to the March 2009 U.S. Census Bureau release, had a population of 6,300,066 as of July 2008,[7] making it the number one metropolitan area in population growth in the nation last year.

Robert, you hold nothing back with your efforts at stupidity. You're the archetype of a Chicagoan.

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

That post is incorrect on so many different levels.

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

"Racist!!!!

(07-14-2009 12:28 PM)uhmump95 Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

That post is incorrect on so many different levels.

Hopefully you, a southern lib, will finally see how elitist these northern and western libs are and how they view the south. To them, libs in the south are nothing but useful idiots.

(07-14-2009 12:35 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:28 PM)uhmump95 Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

That post is incorrect on so many different levels.

Hopefully you, a southern lib, will finally see how elitist these northern and western libs are and how they view the south. To them, libs in the south are nothing but useful idiots.

I am not a southern liberal. I am a moderate. I lived up north for 6 years, I know how they view us southerners. You think the norther liberals are bad, wait until you hear from the northern conservatives ....

(07-14-2009 12:14 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

That right there shows why everyone thinks you're a fuken moron. They haven't had negative growth in any decade since it was founded.

1860 678
—
1870 3,000 342.5%
1880 10,358 245.3%
1890 38,067 267.5%
1900 42,639 12.0%
1910 92,104 116.0%
1920 158,976 72.6%
1930 260,475 63.8%
1940 294,734 13.2%
1950 434,462 47.4%
1960 679,684 56.4%
1970 844,401 24.2%
1980 904,078 7.1%
1990 1,006,877 11.4%
2000 1,188,580 18.0%
Est. 2009 1,306,350 9.9%

Of course the rednecks from the surrounding area move in. Of course, they don't have the money to pay a lot so the price has to be kept low. When I said "nobody", I meant people with brains.

(07-14-2009 12:15 PM)DrTorch Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:00 PM)GGniner Wrote:  and not in catostrophic mode like Liberal areas....that darn Free Market stuff.

Thomas Sowell explains here:

http://tv.nationalreview.com/uncommonkno...BiNTNlYTE=

The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there.

Quote:Dallas (pronounced /ˈdæləs/) is the third largest city in the state of Texas after Houston and San Antonio and the eighth-largest in the United States.[4] As of July 1, 2009, CNN Money reported Dallas edged past San Diego (pop. 1,279,329) back into the 8th spot, with a population of 1,279,910.[5]

With an estimated population nearing 1.3 million,[1][6] the city is the main economic center of the 12-county Dallas–Fort Worth–Arlington metropolitan area that according to the March 2009 U.S. Census Bureau release, had a population of 6,300,066 as of July 2008,[7] making it the number one metropolitan area in population growth in the nation last year.

Robert, you hold nothing back with your efforts at stupidity. You're the archetype of a Chicagoan.

THe 700 Club is on. You don't want to miss it.

(07-14-2009 12:35 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:28 PM)uhmump95 Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:12 PM)RobertN Wrote:  The prices didn't get as high in Dallas because nobody wants to move there. Oh also, the houses were built by illegals who know nothing about carpentry so the houses are built like crap and will start falling apart much sooner than many in the north?

That post is incorrect on so many different levels.

Hopefully you, a southern lib, will finally see how elitist these northern and western libs are and how they view the south. To them, libs in the south are nothing but useful idiots.

Well, you certainly fit that description.

(07-14-2009 12:42 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Well, you certainly fit that description.

Again Robert, if you moonbats are so Gdamn much more intelligent than us "inbred, southern redneck conservatives", why is it you can't provide for your own sorry ass? Why do you ALWAYS vote for a government to provide for you? To make decisions for you? Doesn't sound too intelligent to me. Matter of fact, sounds as if you should have never left your mom's tit.

(07-14-2009 12:39 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Of course the rednecks from the surrounding area move in. Of course, they don't have the money to pay a lot so the price has to be kept low. When I said "nobody", I meant people with brains.

Actually dipshit, as with any major city in the South, the middle-class and family-oriented people are moving OUT of the city and into the burbs. Those people, you f'n moron, are generally younger, single people moving in closer to work and closer to the night life.

Wanna talk about homes in the South? Fine. Here's mine. I'll expect yours in a post afterwards. If you're ashamed of your cardboard box, I'll understand.

Rob's digs???

(07-14-2009 12:47 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:42 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Well, you certainly fit that description.

Again Robert, if you moonbats are so Gdamn much more intelligent than us "inbred, southern redneck conservatives", why is it you can't provide for your own sorry ass? Why do you ALWAYS vote for a government to provide for you? To make decisions for you? Doesn't sound too intelligent to me. Matter of fact, sounds as if you should have never left your mom's tit.

We could if the southern states didn't STEAL the tax dollars from the northern states.

(07-14-2009 01:48 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:47 PM)Rebel Wrote:  

(07-14-2009 12:42 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Well, you certainly fit that description.

Again Robert, if you moonbats are so Gdamn much more intelligent than us "inbred, southern redneck conservatives", why is it you can't provide for your own sorry ass? Why do you ALWAYS vote for a government to provide for you? To make decisions for you? Doesn't sound too intelligent to me. Matter of fact, sounds as if you should have never left your mom's tit.

We could if the southern states didn't STEAL the tax dollars from the northern states.

Your argument makes no sense. Then again, they rarely do. You're FOR increasing federal taxes, yet you're now using it to strengthen your argument? Hypocrite much? As for taxes paid out vs. taxes paid in, as you can see, it's not a "Southern thing", hate to ruin your argument with the facts:

http://www.taxfoundation.org/files/sr139.pdf