Failed his first test miserably.....BTW, the pirates were not his first test.

YEP !

History will prove OBAMA is the biggest, dumbest loser and radical we have had in the white house the past century..........................at least that is the desparate hope of the right. .....


was it the twins who first tested the sox?

(04-14-2009 10:09 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  YEP !

History will prove OBAMA is the biggest, dumbest loser and radical we have had in the white house the past century..........................at least that is the desparate hope of the right. .....


was it the twins who first tested the sox?

I enjoy that you cannot answer the question as to if you think the North Korean launch was Obama's first test.

I hope you enjoy the taste of your kool-aid.

(04-13-2009 10:06 PM)onlinepole Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 10:02 AM)NIU Chicago Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 09:57 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  Is Limbaugh disappointed?

Just asking....

It is so sad the POTUS is threatened by a radio host.

Taking on some backward ass pirates is not a national security test.

Limbaugh doesn't want BO's socialist agenda to succeed.

Seems that shrub could never pass his 1st national security test. In 7 years he never was able to track down Bin Laden and bring him to justice. There pirates had not been taken on by anybody, the Europeans and Saudis continually paid them ransom. They now that any attack on an American ship will lead to their destruction.

All Limbaugh wants is to get fatter and have his idiotic views heard on more stations. Ol Fat Bastards ratings are tanking and his continual bellicose blathering is only serving Obama's interests.

I love the way you have to attack his weight.

Have you ever listened to Rush or only the BS sound bites that the nut job left pulls off the radio.

Why is BO and the crazed left so afraid of Rush - because he is against BO's socialist policies???

You probably are a fat bastard too.

(04-14-2009 10:09 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  YEP !

History will prove OBAMA is the biggest, dumbest loser and radical we have had in the white house the past century..........................at least that is the desparate hope of the right. .....


was it the twins who first tested the sox?

Cybes - I and I think everyone wants the economy to turn around.

HOWEVER we don't want this to become a socialist country because of BO.

Just read the reports from the Congressional Budget Office - they state that BO is making a huge mistake and our economy will suffer long-term because of it.

BO can't hide anymore - his policies he refused to discuss in detail, and the media let him, are out there now.

I applaud the US taking lethal action against the pirates.
Unfortunately,the new administrations Middle East policies will lead to a greater intensification of violence against Israel.Israel will move to protect itself and it will lead to a major conflict.

(04-14-2009 05:08 PM)NIU Chicago Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 10:06 PM)onlinepole Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 10:02 AM)NIU Chicago Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 09:57 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  Is Limbaugh disappointed?

Just asking....

It is so sad the POTUS is threatened by a radio host.

Taking on some backward ass pirates is not a national security test.

Limbaugh doesn't want BO's socialist agenda to succeed.

Seems that shrub could never pass his 1st national security test. In 7 years he never was able to track down Bin Laden and bring him to justice. There pirates had not been taken on by anybody, the Europeans and Saudis continually paid them ransom. They now that any attack on an American ship will lead to their destruction.

All Limbaugh wants is to get fatter and have his idiotic views heard on more stations. Ol Fat Bastards ratings are tanking and his continual bellicose blathering is only serving Obama's interests.

I love the way you have to attack his weight.

Have you ever listened to Rush or only the BS sound bites that the nut job left pulls off the radio.

Why is BO and the crazed left so afraid of Rush - because he is against BO's socialist policies???

You probably are a fat bastard too.

He wouldn't be such an easy targe to attack if he wasn't such a complete and total asshat. Any newsmaker or commentator who says that he wants the current president regardless of the administration to fail deserves all the scorn he gets.

Actually I don't mind at all if he keeps making a fool of himself because it only serves to strengthen Obama's popularity and agenda which right now is hovering in the 70% range which is a large reason why the reich wing is going so nuts. When Obama's agenda succeeds the reich wing is screwed.

O BTW as far a weight is concerned, druggie's got me by almost 100 LB.

(04-13-2009 12:15 PM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 09:57 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  Is Limbaugh disappointed?

Just asking....

No, he failed. His first test was North Korea lobbing a test missle. This pirate thing came after that, and no way the pirate issue is a national security test.

I completely disagree with your assessment that hijacking shipping vessels in this day and age of global economics is not a national security threat. Not only are we talking about a form of economic terrorism, but it also serves a reminder to just how vulnerable the transportation sector is to attack. Without sounding extremist, what's to stop a hijacked vessel from coming into one of our ports or piers loaded with dirty bombs?

Then again, what do I know? I only work in the industry for a living...

(04-15-2009 10:21 PM)huskiefan035 Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 12:15 PM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 09:57 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  Is Limbaugh disappointed?

Just asking....

No, he failed. His first test was North Korea lobbing a test missle. This pirate thing came after that, and no way the pirate issue is a national security test.

I completely disagree with your assessment that hijacking shipping vessels in this day and age of global economics is not a national security threat. Not only are we talking about a form of economic terrorism, but it also serves a reminder to just how vulnerable the transportation sector is to attack. Without sounding extremist, what's to stop a hijacked vessel from coming into one of our ports or piers loaded with dirty bombs?

Then again, what do I know? I only work in the industry for a living...

Is a private car-jack a national security threat? Clearly it is not - then why do you consider hijacking a private ship a national security threat?

Lettermen: Limbaugh's dog wants "BO" - the first dog - to fail.

Oil shipped thru Suez is being regularly charaged pirate fees to pass safely thereby disupting the supply chain and raising the cost of oil and increasing insurance premiums paid by shippers... potentially dwindling US reserves....and aiding al Quida sympathizers...

here is hoping the US NEWSEEK link below helps explain the security threat concern .

You may wish to scroll to the last paragraph

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/04/15/p...newssearch

(04-16-2009 08:20 AM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  

(04-15-2009 10:21 PM)huskiefan035 Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 12:15 PM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 09:57 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  Is Limbaugh disappointed?

Just asking....

No, he failed. His first test was North Korea lobbing a test missle. This pirate thing came after that, and no way the pirate issue is a national security test.

I completely disagree with your assessment that hijacking shipping vessels in this day and age of global economics is not a national security threat. Not only are we talking about a form of economic terrorism, but it also serves a reminder to just how vulnerable the transportation sector is to attack. Without sounding extremist, what's to stop a hijacked vessel from coming into one of our ports or piers loaded with dirty bombs?

Then again, what do I know? I only work in the industry for a living...

Is a private car-jack a national security threat? Clearly it is not - then why do you consider hijacking a private ship a national security threat?

Come on, are you seriously trying to compare a car-jacking to economic terrorism? Yes, car-jacking is a bad, often violent crime. But please tell me that you are not seriously comparing it to disrupting the world's shipping lanes.

035,

It's really simple to comprehend.

Those with hairs up their arse are not about to give an inch & will discredit anything Obama. He is their Worst Nightmare & Anti-Christ.. . Everything critical flows from this deep seated fear.

(04-16-2009 09:36 PM)huskiefan035 Wrote:  

(04-16-2009 08:20 AM)Rock Bottom Wrote:  

(04-15-2009 10:21 PM)huskiefan035 Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 12:15 PM)GeorgeBorkFan Wrote:  

(04-13-2009 09:57 AM)cyberdawg Wrote:  Is Limbaugh disappointed?

Just asking....

No, he failed. His first test was North Korea lobbing a test missle. This pirate thing came after that, and no way the pirate issue is a national security test.

I completely disagree with your assessment that hijacking shipping vessels in this day and age of global economics is not a national security threat. Not only are we talking about a form of economic terrorism, but it also serves a reminder to just how vulnerable the transportation sector is to attack. Without sounding extremist, what's to stop a hijacked vessel from coming into one of our ports or piers loaded with dirty bombs?

Then again, what do I know? I only work in the industry for a living...

Is a private car-jack a national security threat? Clearly it is not - then why do you consider hijacking a private ship a national security threat?

Come on, are you seriously trying to compare a car-jacking to economic terrorism? Yes, car-jacking is a bad, often violent crime. But please tell me that you are not seriously comparing it to disrupting the world's shipping lanes.

The problem is we DON'T treat urban crime and gangs as a national problem. As horrific as 9/11 was, the horror of that day pales in comparison to the number of murders committed in the U.S. each year. Why do we spend billions (trillions even maybe) on the "war on terror" yet we spend such a relative pittance on crime that we are all VERY much more likely to be struck by.

And yes - I'm comparing car-jacking to the pirates. Urban gangs disrupt the lives of many more people than those on ships that are pirated, yet for some reason that is not taken seriously. It amazes me the things we waste our money on as a country when we relatively ignore much larger problems.

(04-16-2009 09:56 PM)cyberdawg Wrote:  035,

It's really simple to comprehend.

Those with hairs up their arse are not about to give an inch & will discredit anything Obama. He is their Worst Nightmare & Anti-Christ.. . Everything critical flows from this deep seated fear.

Cybes - READ. I credited OB, I just said I didn't think this was a national security issue. But OB wants to claim credit even when it's not due. For example, he's trying to claim his stimulus package is working when hardly any contracts have been awarded with that money, let alone been dispursed to contractors. Do all of you realize if a $100,000,000 construction contract is awarded today it takes years for that money to all actually get spent and paid to the company and then its workers and subcontractors?

(04-13-2009 10:43 AM)Kedzman Wrote:  American vessels did not have a pirate problem when Bush was president. They were afraid he would blow them out of the water. The fact that they acted against the USA under Obama is a direct mockery of their respect for our new president.

Those pirates should be shark bait. Instead, they seized a 2nd vessel.

The mad man in Iran is going full force ahead with his nuke plans. Obama won't stop him. Israel will have to bomb Iran to protect themselves. Obama will back away from Israel - the Muslims will crush Israel, then it's Revelation time. Better get right with God. Our time is short.

Kedz, you are spending too much time memorizing the Bible and not enough time in the real world.