Which of the below statements is a fact and which one is an attempt at character assassination:

1. Supreme Court Justice Scalia is a homophobe.

2. Barney Frank is a flaming incompetent rump ranger.

(Robert, the correct answer is #2)

Quote:Masscahusetts Rep. Barney Frank called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a "homophobe" in an interview released Monday on a gay online news site, and said he hoped a challenge to a federal law widely disliked in the gay community will not be heard before the high court until new justices are seated on the bench.

Frank, who is gay, made the remark in responding to a question about legal challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act. The 1996 law says the federal government and states have no obligation to recognize same-sex marriages even if other states allow them.

"At some point, [the Defense of Marriage Act] is going to have to go to the United States Supreme Court," the congressman, a Democrat, said. "I wouldn't want it to go to the United States Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia has got too many votes on this current court."

Last month a controversial judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared the 12-year-old law unconstitutional. That's the second time a judge from the notably liberal court has made such a ruling.

But both rulings were administrative in nature and offered no precedent, thus making it unlikely they would be appealed to the Supreme Court. Nonetheless, a judicial marker has been set that has clearly drawn the interest of the gay community.

Scalia is no stranger to personal attacks and is a favorite target for gays because of his dissent in a 2003 case that overturned the nation's consensual sodomy laws.

In that case Scalia held the majority's ruling represented "a massive disruption of the current social order."

He went on to conclude that "the Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are immoral and unacceptable, the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality and obscenity."

A representative for Scalia was not immediately available for comment

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/...homophobe/

or

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29843734/

or

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090324/ap_o...otus_frank

Barney better not be holding out very long because the next vacancy is going to be Ginsberg.

Barney and Democrat members of the House Banking Committee

.

You guys stop slammin' on Robert's fav Congressman/woman/she thang/it/pocket pooler/rumper roomer/fudge packer/ass-set/fog of warrior/oh that wrinkled feeling/brown stains in the moonlighter .... OK ... enuff Trip.

I apologize for these guys Robert .... I know Buawnee means so much to you and all ...

.

Scalia is a heck of nice guy, he probably just laughed it off. Barney Frank has gone south with the mouth so much that you can't understand what he says half the time.

So, is SNL now banned from making fun of Barney beans n Frank?

Let me see, being called a homophobe by a F@ggot, just really has no meaning. If you are a F@ggot all Heterosexuals are homophobic, are they not..... Except maybe for bi-sexuals.

I don't know if he is a homophobe...but...His decision in the Heller case was as useless as a football bat.

(03-23-2009 09:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Which of the below statements is a fact and which one is an attempt at character assassination:

1. Supreme Court Justice Scalia is a homophobe.

2. Barney Frank is a flaming incompetent rump ranger.

(Robert, the correct answer is #2)

Quote:Masscahusetts Rep. Barney Frank called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a "homophobe" in an interview released Monday on a gay online news site, and said he hoped a challenge to a federal law widely disliked in the gay community will not be heard before the high court until new justices are seated on the bench.

Frank, who is gay, made the remark in responding to a question about legal challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act. The 1996 law says the federal government and states have no obligation to recognize same-sex marriages even if other states allow them.

"At some point, [the Defense of Marriage Act] is going to have to go to the United States Supreme Court," the congressman, a Democrat, said. "I wouldn't want it to go to the United States Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia has got too many votes on this current court."

Last month a controversial judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared the 12-year-old law unconstitutional. That's the second time a judge from the notably liberal court has made such a ruling.

But both rulings were administrative in nature and offered no precedent, thus making it unlikely they would be appealed to the Supreme Court. Nonetheless, a judicial marker has been set that has clearly drawn the interest of the gay community.

Scalia is no stranger to personal attacks and is a favorite target for gays because of his dissent in a 2003 case that overturned the nation's consensual sodomy laws.

In that case Scalia held the majority's ruling represented "a massive disruption of the current social order."

He went on to conclude that "the Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are immoral and unacceptable, the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality and obscenity."

A representative for Scalia was not immediately available for comment

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/...homophobe/

or

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29843734/

or

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090324/ap_o...otus_frank

Well, I would guess both are fact but the way the second was written puts you in the homophobe category too.

(03-24-2009 05:27 PM)SumOfAllFears Wrote:  Let me see, being called a homophobe by a F@ggot, just really has no meaning. If you are a F@ggot all Heterosexuals are homophobic, are they not..... Except maybe for bi-sexuals.

No. Not every heterosexual is homophobic. THere are rational people out there. You obviously aren't one of the rational ones.

(03-25-2009 02:14 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(03-23-2009 09:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Which of the below statements is a fact and which one is an attempt at character assassination:

1. Supreme Court Justice Scalia is a homophobe.

2. Barney Frank is a flaming incompetent rump ranger.

(Robert, the correct answer is #2)

Well, I would guess both are fact but the way the second was written puts you in the homophobe category too.

Damn! You are given the correct answer.... and you still get it wrong.

(03-25-2009 02:19 AM)RobertN Wrote:  No. Not every heterosexual is homophobic. THere are rational people out there. You obviously aren't one of the rational ones.

Robert if you want to try to REALIZE the Honest Truth to all this PC Foolishness, IT IS the Homo's who are "Hetrophobic" and that is the FACT JACK.

I don't give a ratz azz what some sucker holds in his mouth - - that, to me, is his own business - - it is these Radical Screaming Flaming Fundamentalist FAGs who muck it up for the REST OF SOCIETY.

Just 15 years ago, we were still lynching mutten crunchers and now you can not turn on the TV, Radio, or open any printed media without some reference to Faggotism and it is sickening.

And YES, there are Two Camps in the lime light here:
1)- Gays who just want to live and let live and be left alone.
2)- Radical Faggots who want to just piss as many people off as they possibly can.

The 2nd Group are the most Well Balanced - - THEY HAVE the SAME SIZE CHIP on EACH SHOULDER !!!!!

So you Muff Dive or Peter Puff .... SO WHAT and BIG DEAL Rosie and Ellen and Buwanee ..... I don't give a sh't people .... keep what you eat to your self and maybe, just maybe, some of your heartaches will magically disappear ..... LIKE DUH ....

You Follow ???????

.

(03-25-2009 02:14 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(03-23-2009 09:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Which of the below statements is a fact and which one is an attempt at character assassination:

1. Supreme Court Justice Scalia is a homophobe.

2. Barney Frank is a flaming incompetent rump ranger.

(Robert, the correct answer is #2)

Quote:Masscahusetts Rep. Barney Frank called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a "homophobe" in an interview released Monday on a gay online news site, and said he hoped a challenge to a federal law widely disliked in the gay community will not be heard before the high court until new justices are seated on the bench.

Frank, who is gay, made the remark in responding to a question about legal challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act. The 1996 law says the federal government and states have no obligation to recognize same-sex marriages even if other states allow them.

"At some point, [the Defense of Marriage Act] is going to have to go to the United States Supreme Court," the congressman, a Democrat, said. "I wouldn't want it to go to the United States Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia has got too many votes on this current court."

Last month a controversial judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared the 12-year-old law unconstitutional. That's the second time a judge from the notably liberal court has made such a ruling.

But both rulings were administrative in nature and offered no precedent, thus making it unlikely they would be appealed to the Supreme Court. Nonetheless, a judicial marker has been set that has clearly drawn the interest of the gay community.

Scalia is no stranger to personal attacks and is a favorite target for gays because of his dissent in a 2003 case that overturned the nation's consensual sodomy laws.

In that case Scalia held the majority's ruling represented "a massive disruption of the current social order."

He went on to conclude that "the Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are immoral and unacceptable, the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality and obscenity."

A representative for Scalia was not immediately available for comment

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/...homophobe/

or

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29843734/

or

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090324/ap_o...otus_frank

Well, I would guess both are fact but the way the second was written puts you in the homophobe category too.

Why is it you liberals love to stick labels on us yet when we do it you ***** and moan? Are we supposed to ignore the fact that Frank is a sword swallower the same way you ignored that Bush was a former alcoholic?

BTW, a homophobe either hates or fears homosexuals - I have neither. I simply disagree with their lifestyle and don't want them forcing it on me. You, on the other hand, seem totally content having them force you to accept their values.

(03-25-2009 09:33 AM)Tripster Wrote:  

(03-25-2009 02:19 AM)RobertN Wrote:  No. Not every heterosexual is homophobic. THere are rational people out there. You obviously aren't one of the rational ones.

Robert if you want to try to REALIZE the Honest Truth to all this PC Foolishness, IT IS the Homo's who are "Hetrophobic" and that is the FACT JACK.

I don't give a ratz azz what some sucker holds in his mouth - - that, to me, is his own business - - it is these Radical Screaming Flaming Fundamentalist FAGs who muck it up for the REST OF SOCIETY.

Just 15 years ago, we were still lynching mutten crunchers and now you can not turn on the TV, Radio, or open any printed media without some reference to Faggotism and it is sickening.

And YES, there are Two Camps in the lime light here:
1)- Gays who just want to live and let live and be left alone.
2)- Radical Faggots who want to just piss as many people off as they possibly can.

The 2nd Group are the most Well Balanced - - THEY HAVE the SAME SIZE CHIP on EACH SHOULDER !!!!!

So you Muff Dive or Peter Puff .... SO WHAT and BIG DEAL Rosie and Ellen and Buwanee ..... I don't give a sh't people .... keep what you eat to your self and maybe, just maybe, some of your heartaches will magically disappear ..... LIKE DUH ....

You Follow ???????

.

Yeah. I understand. You pretend to not care about them but in real life you can't stand them. Your colorful language gives you away.

(03-25-2009 01:50 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(03-25-2009 09:33 AM)Tripster Wrote:  

(03-25-2009 02:19 AM)RobertN Wrote:  No. Not every heterosexual is homophobic. THere are rational people out there. You obviously aren't one of the rational ones.

Robert if you want to try to REALIZE the Honest Truth to all this PC Foolishness, IT IS the Homo's who are "Hetrophobic" and that is the FACT JACK.

I don't give a ratz azz what some sucker holds in his mouth - - that, to me, is his own business - - it is these Radical Screaming Flaming Fundamentalist FAGs who muck it up for the REST OF SOCIETY.

Just 15 years ago, we were still lynching mutten crunchers and now you can not turn on the TV, Radio, or open any printed media without some reference to Faggotism and it is sickening.

And YES, there are Two Camps in the lime light here:
1)- Gays who just want to live and let live and be left alone.
2)- Radical Faggots who want to just piss as many people off as they possibly can.

The 2nd Group are the most Well Balanced - - THEY HAVE the SAME SIZE CHIP on EACH SHOULDER !!!!!

So you Muff Dive or Peter Puff .... SO WHAT and BIG DEAL Rosie and Ellen and Buwanee ..... I don't give a sh't people .... keep what you eat to your self and maybe, just maybe, some of your heartaches will magically disappear ..... LIKE DUH ....

You Follow ???????

.

Yeah. I understand. You pretend to not care about them but in real life you can't stand them. Your colorful language gives you away.

I guess in your world you like things you find to be morally wrong and outright disgusting. I choose not to live in your world or any world where a man is judged by the color of his purse.

(03-25-2009 01:50 PM)RobertN Wrote:  Yeah. I understand. You pretend to not care about them but in real life you can't stand them. Your colorful language gives you away.

Robert, I have a close family member who is gay ....

She just wants a quiet life where she is not in peoples face and she is no radical. She hates these Butt Cheese Freaks because all their screaming and hollering does, is cause her to slide back toward a Closeted World.

And yes Robert, there are Gay People who just want to get on with their lives and THEN there are the Flaming Faggots who love being Flaming Faggots up in everyone's faces .....

We tolerated it for a while and figured they would grow tired of the stupidity, but it was a Virus to them that infected almost everyone it contacted and now, most of the rest of us, are Pretty Damn Sick of the In-Your-Face Faggotism we are slathered with at every turn.

Google for Islamberg Robert, they are needing a Few Worthless Men ....

.

(03-25-2009 11:57 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(03-25-2009 02:14 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(03-23-2009 09:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Which of the below statements is a fact and which one is an attempt at character assassination:

1. Supreme Court Justice Scalia is a homophobe.

2. Barney Frank is a flaming incompetent rump ranger.

(Robert, the correct answer is #2)

Quote:Masscahusetts Rep. Barney Frank called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a "homophobe" in an interview released Monday on a gay online news site, and said he hoped a challenge to a federal law widely disliked in the gay community will not be heard before the high court until new justices are seated on the bench.

Frank, who is gay, made the remark in responding to a question about legal challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act. The 1996 law says the federal government and states have no obligation to recognize same-sex marriages even if other states allow them.

"At some point, [the Defense of Marriage Act] is going to have to go to the United States Supreme Court," the congressman, a Democrat, said. "I wouldn't want it to go to the United States Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia has got too many votes on this current court."

Last month a controversial judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared the 12-year-old law unconstitutional. That's the second time a judge from the notably liberal court has made such a ruling.

But both rulings were administrative in nature and offered no precedent, thus making it unlikely they would be appealed to the Supreme Court. Nonetheless, a judicial marker has been set that has clearly drawn the interest of the gay community.

Scalia is no stranger to personal attacks and is a favorite target for gays because of his dissent in a 2003 case that overturned the nation's consensual sodomy laws.

In that case Scalia held the majority's ruling represented "a massive disruption of the current social order."

He went on to conclude that "the Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are immoral and unacceptable, the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality and obscenity."

A representative for Scalia was not immediately available for comment

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/...homophobe/

or

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29843734/

or

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090324/ap_o...otus_frank

Well, I would guess both are fact but the way the second was written puts you in the homophobe category too.

Why is it you liberals love to stick labels on us yet when we do it you ***** and moan? Are we supposed to ignore the fact that Frank is a sword swallower the same way you ignored that Bush was a former alcoholic?

BTW, a homophobe either hates or fears homosexuals - I have neither. I simply disagree with their lifestyle and don't want them forcing it on me. You, on the other hand, seem totally content having them force you to accept their values.

THey are forcing it on you? No one is saying you have to join their "lifestyle". THey just want equal opportunities-which you won't let happen because you are forcing YOUR interpretation of the Bible(ie. YOUR VALUES) on them.

RobertN, We all know you and the F@ggot Frank enjoy a good @ss fu(king, but why don't you just STFU about things you know nothing about.

(03-26-2009 01:24 PM)RobertN Wrote:  

(03-25-2009 11:57 AM)smn1256 Wrote:  

(03-25-2009 02:14 AM)RobertN Wrote:  

(03-23-2009 09:31 PM)smn1256 Wrote:  Which of the below statements is a fact and which one is an attempt at character assassination:

1. Supreme Court Justice Scalia is a homophobe.

2. Barney Frank is a flaming incompetent rump ranger.

(Robert, the correct answer is #2)

Quote:Masscahusetts Rep. Barney Frank called Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia a "homophobe" in an interview released Monday on a gay online news site, and said he hoped a challenge to a federal law widely disliked in the gay community will not be heard before the high court until new justices are seated on the bench.

Frank, who is gay, made the remark in responding to a question about legal challenges to the Defense of Marriage Act. The 1996 law says the federal government and states have no obligation to recognize same-sex marriages even if other states allow them.

"At some point, [the Defense of Marriage Act] is going to have to go to the United States Supreme Court," the congressman, a Democrat, said. "I wouldn't want it to go to the United States Supreme Court now because that homophobe Antonin Scalia has got too many votes on this current court."

Last month a controversial judge on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals declared the 12-year-old law unconstitutional. That's the second time a judge from the notably liberal court has made such a ruling.

But both rulings were administrative in nature and offered no precedent, thus making it unlikely they would be appealed to the Supreme Court. Nonetheless, a judicial marker has been set that has clearly drawn the interest of the gay community.

Scalia is no stranger to personal attacks and is a favorite target for gays because of his dissent in a 2003 case that overturned the nation's consensual sodomy laws.

In that case Scalia held the majority's ruling represented "a massive disruption of the current social order."

He went on to conclude that "the Texas statute undeniably seeks to further the belief of its citizens that certain forms of sexual behavior are immoral and unacceptable, the same interest furthered by criminal laws against fornication, bigamy, adultery, adult incest, bestiality and obscenity."

A representative for Scalia was not immediately available for comment

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/03/...homophobe/

or

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/29843734/

or

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090324/ap_o...otus_frank

Well, I would guess both are fact but the way the second was written puts you in the homophobe category too.

Why is it you liberals love to stick labels on us yet when we do it you ***** and moan? Are we supposed to ignore the fact that Frank is a sword swallower the same way you ignored that Bush was a former alcoholic?

BTW, a homophobe either hates or fears homosexuals - I have neither. I simply disagree with their lifestyle and don't want them forcing it on me. You, on the other hand, seem totally content having them force you to accept their values.

THey are forcing it on you? No one is saying you have to join their "lifestyle". THey just want equal opportunities-which you won't let happen because you are forcing YOUR interpretation of the Bible(ie. YOUR VALUES) on them.

Yes, they are forcing it on me when there's gay pride all over the place and the state is involved with amending its constitution and a bunch of other stuff. As for equal opportunities, with the exception of being a husband or wife, where are they not equal? BTW, it has nothing to do with the bible (at least not for me) it has to do with basic moral values. Gays don't want to take small baby steps in their attempt to get what they want, they're demanding the majority of the country accept their morals and accept them right now.

For the record, and I've said this before, I have a gay sister and cousine and that hasn't changed my core values.

Frank shows just how stupid people in Massachusetts really are. In the middle of a financial crisis he is more concerend about protecting filthy behavior of people who spread diseases and rack up high health care costs on all americans.

(03-28-2009 12:59 AM)OUBOBCATJOHN Wrote:  Frank shows just how stupid people in Massachusetts really are. In the middle of a financial crisis he is more concerend about protecting filthy behavior of people who spread diseases and rack up high health care costs on all americans.

Are you saying that heterosexual people aren't just as bad? Please.