He's not talking about a "Theocracy", he's talking about a Constitutional Amendment(something that is constitutional). I beleive on the issue's of life and probably marriage. Not a national religion
Duncan Hunter and Paul have both had legislation to define that "Life Starts at conception", i.e. what science and the bible/God says. The problem with that type of legislation is that it would be thrown out rather quickly by SCOTUS because the Constitution says it applies to "Those
born in"....they likely know their legislation is pointless, however political. atleast hunter.
to actually get that accomplished it would take a Constitutional Amendment. Which I beleive is what he's referring to, unless he's talking about the issue of Marriage. In which case he wants to constitutionally amend the Constitution to make it match the way Americans for the last two centuries have defined marriage themselves, not to mention the biblical view.
the problem with Huck, other than his governing record in a Democrat controlled/dominated state, is he's going too far with his rhetoric and playing into the hands of the secular left.
World Mag had an article on this recently, titled: "Republicans need to be more like Sam Adams"
WorldMag doesn't give the full article, however I googled it and found on a Huckabee site, interesting argument. It addresses that point and mentions Huckabee directly. So far he's not listening.....although I'd imagine if he has a Political IQ, which he does, he'd tone it down considerably in the general.
link