Hello There, Guest! (LoginRegister)

Post Reply 
NMSU to host 07 & 08
Author Message
Bookmark and Share
Vandal9570 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 186
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #21
 
Based on the recent Big West Conference tournaments, it seems that USU fans travel very, very well, particularly if the school is clearly contending for an NCAA bid. I would expect to see WAC tournament attendance increase with the Aggies in the conference.

I agree - Pan Am renovation was probably a factor, and should look flashy on TV. Particularly if it's full.

And this should benefit Theus' program, as a previous poster mentioned - the road to the NCAA will run through Las Cruces for a few seasons.
11-17-2005 02:46 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
clpack Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,091
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Nevada
Location:
Post: #22
 
Vandal9570 Wrote:the road to the NCAA will run through Las Cruces for a few seasons.
I don't believe that. With recruiting on the upswing, Nevada isn't going to give up the top spot without a fight. 04-cheers
11-17-2005 03:40 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
WildBlue Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 32
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #23
 
IIRC, USU brought close to 5000 to Anaheim the last few years.

Of course, being in the running for a NCAA Tournament slot helped, as did the proximity to Disneyland. The BW tournament was also usually around the same weekend as Spring Break at USU. I'm sure you could expect a couple thousand from Logan if the team is competative and the games are on the right weekend.

Here's the Smith Spectrum - sorry the first shot is kinda screwy.

[Image: g-smith_spec.jpg]
[Image: g-spec_brown2.jpg]
[Image: spectrum.jpg]
11-17-2005 03:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Vandal9570 Offline
Bench Warmer
*

Posts: 186
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #24
 
"I don't believe that. With recruiting on the upswing, Nevada isn't going to give up the top spot without a fight."

Right - I just mean the literal road. NMSU does get the home court (for whatever it's worth).
11-17-2005 04:45 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MinerTavo Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 993
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 7
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #25
 
as previously mentioned, other wac schools already got a shot at hosting the conference tourney and it turned out to be a big money loser for them when their teams got knocked out early - fresno and nevada. Additionally, the WAC has long followed the pattern of giving the predicted top team in the league the tourney: Tulsa hosted it for years after the split, followed by Fresno and then Nevada - and all were among the top teams when they hosted. Seems to me that the WAC is betting that Theus will turn around the Aggies and have them in contention when the tourney makes its way to Las Cruces. Also, there is the added benefit of keeping the WAC brand in the news in the surrounding El Paso area. After 30 years of membership, there are still many in El Paso who are interested in wac results and it can't hurt to try to keep interest fresh over here.
11-18-2005 12:50 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
ejmpalle Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 927
Joined: Oct 2004
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Utah State
Location:
Post: #26
 
MinerTavo Wrote:Seems to me that the WAC is betting that Theus will turn around the Aggies and have them in contention when the tourney makes its way to Las Cruces. Also, there is the added benefit of keeping the WAC brand in the news in the surrounding El Paso area. After 30 years of membership, there are still many in El Paso who are interested in wac results and it can't hurt to try to keep interest fresh over here.
I've had similar thoughts after thinking about this for a while. But I still don't see it working Las Cruces. I agree with a New Mag who said that it simply came down to who could win the bid.

BUT, my point is that it shouldn't come down to whoever wins a bid. The fans should be included in this, and Idaho and Utah St fans haven't been kept in mind in this decision, IMHO. As previously stated, Utah St draws well for conference tournaments. We brought about 5,000 to Anaheim last year, despite the fact that Pacific was favored to win the BWT. That would've made a large impact on whether the WAC tournament was successfull in Reno or not.

Further, if you want the best team to host the tournament, why not have the regular season champ host the tournament? Obviously, we're not concerned about the best team hosting the tournament, with the decision that was made, because there are no guarantees that NMSU will have the best team.

Second of all, if this were truely about $$$ then why didn't we wait and see how the attendance for this year's tournament panned out, before we decided that Reno wasn't to be the place? I know, I know, Las Cruces out bidded Reno.

So the fans were left out of this decision. 03-puke

Like I say, I'll be in Las Cruces next year. But a LOT of fans won't be there, because it is too far away to drive and flying is too expensive for a lot of people. Reno was within driving distance. Opportunity lost. I've probably given much more than my $.02 on this one, so you won't hear another peep from me.
11-18-2005 02:25 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
DAggie Offline
Water Engineer
*

Posts: 10
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 0
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #27
 
It's interesting many don't think we Las Cruces folks can't bring a good crowd to the Pan Am when we've held many Big West and Sun Belt attendance records. If Reggie has the team I suspect he'll have, the attendance will rise again to our usual 11k+ average.
11-18-2005 02:48 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
clpack Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,091
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Nevada
Location:
Post: #28
 
ejmpalle Wrote:BUT, my point is that it shouldn't come down to whoever wins a bid. The fans should be included in this, and Idaho and Utah St fans haven't been kept in mind in this decision, IMHO. As previously stated, Utah St draws well for conference tournaments. We brought about 5,000 to Anaheim last year, despite the fact that Pacific was favored to win the BWT. That would've made a large impact on whether the WAC tournament was successfull in Reno or not.

Further, if you want the best team to host the tournament, why not have the regular season champ host the tournament? Obviously, we're not concerned about the best team hosting the tournament, with the decision that was made, because there are no guarantees that NMSU will have the best team.
It'll be interesting to see how many Blue Aggies make the trek to Reno this year, without the Disneyland factor. And how next year in LC compares....

I'd personally prefer to see the regular season champ host the tourney, because it would make the regular season title worth so much more, but that makes travel planning very difficult. I doubt we'll see a return to that.
11-18-2005 03:19 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
clpack Offline
1st String
*

Posts: 1,091
Joined: Jun 2005
Reputation: 8
I Root For: Nevada
Location:
Post: #29
 
DAggie Wrote:It's interesting many don't think we Las Cruces folks can't bring a good crowd to the Pan Am when we've held many Big West and Sun Belt attendance records. If Reggie has the team I suspect he'll have, the attendance will rise again to our usual 11k+ average.
I don't think anyone's questioning that at all. In fact, NMS could lead the WAC in attendance if they're in contention.

The concern is the effect on attendance by fans from other schools, and that's completely overshadowed by the impact of whether the home team makes the finals or not. I doubt NMS fans would be any better than others about attending without NMS playing.
11-18-2005 03:24 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
MinerTavo Offline
Special Teams
*

Posts: 993
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 7
I Root For:
Location:
Post: #30
 
That's the whole point though, attendance by outside schools is never going to be at high levels, regardless of the site. Maybe Utah State will prove the exception but the WAC is not a bus league, almost every site is going to be a solid drive for other fans and usually a flight for most. Those that are going to make the trip are going to make it no matter where it is.
11-18-2005 06:49 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
NuMexAg Offline
2nd String
*

Posts: 447
Joined: Apr 2004
Reputation: 20
I Root For: NMSU
Location: DFW
Post: #31
 
Hey, at least La Tech didn't get the bid! (no offense Techsters - just distance)
11-18-2005 06:55 PM
Find all posts by this user Quote this message in a reply
Post Reply 




User(s) browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)


Copyright © 2002-2024 Collegiate Sports Nation Bulletin Board System (CSNbbs), All Rights Reserved.
CSNbbs is an independent fan site and is in no way affiliated to the NCAA or any of the schools and conferences it represents.
This site monetizes links. FTC Disclosure.
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect certain anonymous information when you visit our web site. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (e.g., click stream information, browser type, time and date, subject of advertisements clicked or scrolled over) during your visits to this and other Web sites in order to provide advertisements about goods and services likely to be of greater interest to you. These companies typically use a cookie or third party web beacon to collect this information. To learn more about this behavioral advertising practice or to opt-out of this type of advertising, you can visit http://www.networkadvertising.org.
Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2024 MyBB Group.