MinerTavo Wrote:Seems to me that the WAC is betting that Theus will turn around the Aggies and have them in contention when the tourney makes its way to Las Cruces. Also, there is the added benefit of keeping the WAC brand in the news in the surrounding El Paso area. After 30 years of membership, there are still many in El Paso who are interested in wac results and it can't hurt to try to keep interest fresh over here.
I've had similar thoughts after thinking about this for a while. But I still don't see it working Las Cruces. I agree with a New Mag who said that it simply came down to who could win the bid.
BUT, my point is that it shouldn't come down to whoever wins a bid. The fans should be included in this, and Idaho and Utah St fans haven't been kept in mind in this decision, IMHO. As previously stated, Utah St draws well for conference tournaments. We brought about 5,000 to Anaheim last year, despite the fact that Pacific was favored to win the BWT. That would've made a large impact on whether the WAC tournament was successfull in Reno or not.
Further, if you want the best team to host the tournament, why not have the regular season champ host the tournament? Obviously, we're not concerned about the best team hosting the tournament, with the decision that was made, because there are no guarantees that NMSU will have the best team.
Second of all, if this were truely about $$$ then why didn't we wait and see how the attendance for this year's tournament panned out, before we decided that Reno wasn't to be the place? I know, I know, Las Cruces out bidded Reno.
So the fans were left out of this decision.
Like I say, I'll be in Las Cruces next year. But a LOT of fans won't be there, because it is too far away to drive and flying is too expensive for a lot of people. Reno was within driving distance. Opportunity lost. I've probably given much more than my $.02 on this one, so you won't hear another peep from me.