You have my unwavering admiration! Thanks, Swag! :wave:

This must be a JBR/Dio poster protection program. Oh well. :roflol:

Yeah, I'm just in awe of the way you. . .

Nevermind. I'll just stick to kicking you the legal way, Moses. :roflol:

Nice jab though, counselor. I must really be getting under your skin!

One knows how much that please one. :wave:

Declared Null & Void, 15 April 2004.

How's that mod search coming, Swag? Not that I need any protection but I just don't want y'all deleting any more of my posts when it gets too hot and heavy for the ankle-nippers in here.

If we're going to have the Wild Wild West, then it ought to be what it will be. No limits, period.

joebordenrebel Wrote:Declared Null & Void, 15 April 2004.

The King of the Spin Room has spoken....It must be so! :stupid:


Signed,

Your Humble Servant
GB

That's Sir King Message Board to you, bold knave!

Aren't you supposed to be slopping pigs or some other task equally beneath me?

Last word!

Word, YO! :drink:

Heard'ya loud and clear GT swag master. :D













BOW DOWN TO GT SWGGER!

Hardcore Husky Wrote:Heard'ya loud and clear GT swag master. :D













BOW DOWN TO GT SWGGER!

You Should

joebordenrebel Wrote:Declared Null & Void, 15 April 2004.

Declared revived and alive!

It's on now .

Congrats, GB!

Well, GB, I do have to say I'm enjoying your (mostly) laissez-faire style of reffing. I'm all for total freedom of speech in here but that means everything stays, no matter who says it or what they say.

And thank gawd you're a bit more moderate than the *other* mods who shall remain unnamed. . . :angel:

joebordenrebel Wrote:Well, GB, I do have to say I'm enjoying your (mostly) laissez-faire style of reffing. I'm all for total freedom of speech in here but that means everything stays, no matter who says it or what they say.

And thank gawd you're a bit more moderate than the *other* mods who shall remain unnamed. . . :angel:

The only thing that I have done is edited a few poster attacks, and locked 3 threads (all of which were about posters, not politics).

Should I have done more? The way I see it, if everyone can keep the discussions to politics and things of that sort...go at it. I don't think I have censored anyone's point of view or been un-even handed.
If you think so, let me know. I am human and do occassionaly make mistakes.

No, I can't think of any clear-cut examples of biased censorship, although the Oddball edits were right on the line.

As I said, I think you're doing a fine job so far. You're a credit to Cons as a race.

joebordenrebel Wrote:No, I can't think of any clear-cut examples of biased censorship, although the Oddball edits were right on the line.

As I said, I think you're doing a fine job so far. You're a credit to Cons as a race.

Oddball edits?

Cons as a Race? So, we are no longer part of the human race...excellent...we have evolved into a superior being!

Nice jab, GB. I can see you've been hanging out with the smart arses in the cafeteria, eh? :D

You know, if you wanted to chat we could just log into AIM. This is sure a slow (and public) way of having a conversation.

joebordenrebel Wrote:Nice jab, GB. I can see you've been hanging out with the smart arses in the cafeteria, eh? :D

You know, if you wanted to chat we could just log into AIM. This is sure a slow (and public) way of having a conversation.

Don't you AIM here! I sold all my guns. I have never set up an AIM account, and I probably never will either.

No seriously about the oddball edits...I am having a fuzzy moment.

Oh, I don't know. It was on some pointless thread (sound familiar?) where people were going back and forth and his attackers were being given free reign but his posts were edited. Don't you remember that?

joebordenrebel Wrote:Oh, I don't know. It was on some pointless thread (sound familiar?) where people were going back and forth and his attackers were being given free reign but his posts were edited. Don't you remember that?

If I remember correctly, I hit one of his posts and one of somebody elses (the guy he was bickering with). I may be wrong, but that is not being a censor. I will have to find it now. Dern it!