(02-12-2018 10:01 AM)JCGSU Wrote:  Do you have any idea that the two star and three star rankings have numbers attached to them? Most Belt three stars are closer to a two than a four. I am pretty sure nobody is saying there is a huge difference in a .794 and a .795 recruit lol but a huge one in a .794 and .894 the .795 is going to a Belt team the .894 three star could be headed to AL...I know you knew that right?

Also basic stats question, was the amount of three and two star- populations the same if not raw numbers are meaningless. It is basically saying because there are more three and two star guys in the NFL then rankings are meaningless...

Yes, they do have numerical ratings, but all 3-stars have higher numerical ratings than any 2-star. Maybe if you were looking at a dozen signees you might have a point but you are looking at 100+ that were eligible for all-conference awards.

And if you had read carefully you'd see I did compare the percentages of 3-star guys to percentage of 3-star guys signed. The three-star guys are underrepresented in the first-team all-conference group.