(03-26-2014 02:15 PM)Check Yosef Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 02:11 PM)AlwaysSunny Wrote:  

(03-26-2014 01:36 PM)Check Yosef Wrote:  I don't know how many posts I read with outdated information and thoughts... Listen this ain't your daddy's sun belt and it ain't even your 3 years ago sun belt, the difference between the SBC and the other g5 performance wise has narrowed to the point where it may as well not exist, in a couple years the same will be with tv revenue and bowl tie ins, it's really silly also that the other g5 think we will jump on an invite when the majority of teams that left the SBC were par to sub par


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

You're delusional. There's still quite a big difference... there's the Sunbelt, CUSA & the MAC...and then there's the AAC & the MWC. In a couple of years the tv revenue and bowl tie ins will still be the same as they are now... there isn't going to be any more major shifting so who exactly is going to be giving out more money to conferences? Weren't the bowl tie ins just redone last year too? I think you'll realize the difference when you see a 11-1 Sunbelt team not get in that access game where as a 11-1 AAC or MWC team will. And that's just speaking of football, basketball....that's a wholeeeeeeeeeee different story. When it comes to the G5 on that one there's pretty much the AAC --------------> everyone else.

I will give AAC they are imbetween g and p mwc not really, and the tie ins and tv will indeed change


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Let's see...the AAC is losing Rutgers to the Big 10, Louisville to the ACC...may lose Cincinnati and another member to the Big 12...
Connecticut will eventually get in somewhere else...
The distance between the AAC and the other peer conferences is and will continue to decrease.