(03-21-2014 04:54 PM)Campaign4Liberty Wrote:  It is hard to take comments like this seriously....It is hard for me to comprehend how EKU is even still in the discussion. As much as some of the SBC President's do not like Liberty, if they have even medicore logical reasoning skills they can see that EKU is nowhere near ready for FBS football.

REV...are you actually serious when you say that EKU would be a better option for the SBC than Liberty? How can that be justified? I want facts here.. I want numbers. I want logic and sound reasoning. Put all ill feelings aside and tell me exactly how EKU would be a better fit than Liberty for the SBC. Ready, go -

It's a simple deal: EKU could get the votes, while Liberty did not.

Make no mistake: EKU is not ready this year. Would be a monumental task for them to be ready next year. But that's the beauty. We are not required to add someone today. If we find someone we like more than Liberty (or someone that can get the votes, more to the point), then we have the luxury of waiting for them. We could easily add them to the conference for all except football, and let the football team grow for 2-3 years and let them join after that.