(05-31-2016 06:13 AM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  

(05-30-2016 11:25 PM)wavefan12 Wrote:  

(05-28-2016 01:49 PM)Kruciff Wrote:  

(05-28-2016 01:26 PM)BigEastHomer Wrote:  

(05-28-2016 12:06 PM)wavefan12 Wrote:  Is Aresco doing a good job, yes. Does an individual, who was hired cause his former TV exec experience, deserve more than half (in salary, never mind travel and benefits) that each school receives in total for TV money per year.......that's always been my contention.

If you don't pay on the front end, you'll be paying on the back end.

The last thing I'm going to do right now is complain about what the freakin commish makes. He's doing a good job.

I think we underpay him, tbh. He's been amazing for us

Good gig if u can get it. What exactly has he accomplished? Radio interviews and taking the obvious tv offer? So he makes 5% of our tv contract, is that an industry standard? What's Bowlby worth....i kid i kid. Like i said, decent job done, but overpaid.

Aresco is playing chess and you're judging him with a checkers brain. You can 'kid' all you want but you conclusions lack a fundamental understanding of what is going on here. This is perhaps the biggest rebuild in this history of collegiate athletics. It's never been about short-term gains.

Accepting the obvious ESPN offer at less than 10% of a P5. Doing radio interviews and promoting the brand. Signing on to crap bowls. That's chess?

Like I said he works hard, as he should, but is overpaid for the results. The next contract will be the deciding factor but we may lose a few schools partially because of how bad the original deal was....and I get it it was not the easiest negotiating period but as they say that is why he gets paid the big bucks and it ends at the top.

This is like the re-alignment talk, expansion talk etc., people are adamant on both sides of the issue.