Well Idaho's vote may or may not be equal to an Alabama vote. The P5 already dominate the football rules by a large margin.

By your failed logic one would think that only McNeese type FCS schools voted not to give stipends to football players in the vote last year. The fact is almost all SBC schools agreed with the P5, additionally there were more than a couple of P5 members who voted no to that two thousand dollar stipend. I know Louisiana voted yes, ULM even voted yes. Louisiana Tech at Ruston I do not recall for sure, probably yes.

The P5 sees a billion dollar pay day and simply are afraid that they will have to give more than a few million to the NCAA. It has zero to do with what Idaho votes, or LTU At Ruston votes for that matter.