+- CSNbbs (https://csnbbs.com)
+-- Forum: Active Boards (/forum-769.html)
+--- Forum: AACbbs (/forum-460.html)
+---- Forum: Members (/forum-401.html)
+----- Forum: MemphisTigers.org (/forum-446.html)
+------ Forum: Dockery-Finch Memorial Tiger Sports Forum (/forum-499.html)
+------ Thread: UCLA -24 (/thread-700972.html)
UCLA -24 - ncrdbl1 - 08-31-2014 02:27 PM
Early line. Let's see how it moves during the week.
RE: UCLA -24 - SmokyTiger - 08-31-2014 02:34 PM
I think we beat that.
Go Tigers Go!
"Hug someone funny today!"
RE: UCLA -24 - FranklinTNTiger - 08-31-2014 02:52 PM
(08-31-2014 02:27 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: Early line. Let's see how it moves during the week.
WOW! If Ifedi doesn't play,line goes to 32!!
RE: UCLA -24 - UofMstateU - 08-31-2014 03:23 PM
I may have to pull the trigger on that. I cant imagine there would be a lot of money coming in for UCLA to cover given the inability of the offense to score yesterday.
RE: UCLA -24 - Joe1 - 08-31-2014 03:32 PM
For you guys that know college football.....can we beat them?
RE: UCLA -24 - SayWhat? - 08-31-2014 03:50 PM
(08-31-2014 02:52 PM)FranklinTNTiger Wrote:(08-31-2014 02:27 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote: Early line. Let's see how it moves during the week.
WOW! If Ifedi doesn't play,line goes to 32!!
If our defense can keep the Bruin offense in check and our offense has good hands for the better part of the game, I think the Tigers make a game of it. Might even surprise us. Who knows, the Tigers are certainly due a couple breaks.
GTG
RE: UCLA -24 - MemTiger90 - 08-31-2014 03:57 PM
(08-31-2014 03:32 PM)Joe1 Wrote: For you guys that know college football.....can we beat them?
Our defense can absolutely stop them. My only concern was the offense. Seeing what I saw yesterday eased that a bit, but our O line will still be out matched
RE: UCLA -24 - memphisike - 08-31-2014 04:36 PM
Remember Dudes, we just smoked a terrible Dll team, i wouldnt get excited and bet the farm just yet.
RE: UCLA -24 - oldmangrizz - 08-31-2014 04:39 PM
That sounds like a lot. Glad I'm not a betting man.
RE: UCLA -24 - Tiger1983 - 08-31-2014 04:52 PM
(08-31-2014 04:36 PM)memphisike Wrote: Remember Dudes, we just smoked a terrible Dll team, i wouldnt get excited and bet the farm just yet.
APSU is an FCS (formally 1-AA) level school.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_Division_I_FCS_football_programs
Division Two is a level below FCS.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_NCAA_conferences
RE: UCLA -24 - Rob - 08-31-2014 05:31 PM
(08-31-2014 03:32 PM)Joe1 Wrote: For you guys that know college football.....can we beat them?
Anything can happen but it's extremely unlikely.
RE: UCLA -24 - ToddMundtOneRebound - 08-31-2014 05:53 PM
Out of curiousity. Does anyone know wh[/align]at the line was when we beat USC
RE: UCLA -24 - UofMstateU - 08-31-2014 06:00 PM
(08-31-2014 05:53 PM)ToddMundtOneRebound Wrote: Out of curiousity. Does anyone know wh[/align]at the line was when we beat USC
No, but our defense back then was notorious for holding teams to a few field goals at best. I cant imagine it would very large of a spread, even though USC was mentioned as a title contender that year.
RE: UCLA -24 - hartless - 08-31-2014 06:04 PM
UCLA has OL issues and I suspect we didn't see the Memphis offence at full throttle. I think we are better than most people think. I think the Tigers will get a W.
RE: UCLA -24 - MuchLuck - 08-31-2014 06:42 PM
(08-31-2014 04:36 PM)memphisike Wrote: Remember Dudes, we just smoked a terrible Dll team, i wouldnt get excited and bet the farm just yet.
If anything, people are talking positive football. At least for now. Let's hope it lasts.
RE: UCLA -24 - ncrdbl1 - 08-31-2014 06:49 PM
(08-31-2014 06:04 PM)hartless Wrote: UCLA has OL issues and I suspect we didn't see the Memphis offence at full throttle. I think we are better than most people think. I think the Tigers will get a W.
If Ifedi misses the game which is likely. That should negate their problems with the OL. Issue will be can we stop the run with our front 7. If so good. if not then they may take advantage of that and play action and beat out safeties. Pit corners are solid but safety is an issue. We will need to be able to run or they will key off on Lynch and make him throw when he is not ready and his habit of throwing to other team could be an issue.
RE: UCLA -24 - ItsDude - 08-31-2014 07:46 PM
UCLA's defense looked very good yesterday....if we can move the ball on them, it will be a moral "victory" if nothing else.....why did Ifedi have to get hurt before this game??
RE: UCLA -24 - U of M/ND fan - 08-31-2014 08:34 PM
(08-31-2014 06:49 PM)ncrdbl1 Wrote:(08-31-2014 06:04 PM)hartless Wrote: UCLA has OL issues and I suspect we didn't see the Memphis offence at full throttle. I think we are better than most people think. I think the Tigers will get a W.
If Ifedi misses the game which is likely. That should negate their problems with the OL. Issue will be can we stop the run with our front 7. If so good. if not then they may take advantage of that and play action and beat out safeties. Pit corners are solid but safety is an issue. We will need to be able to run or they will key off on Lynch and make him throw when he is not ready and his habit of throwing to other team could be an issue.
Ricky Hunter has some big shoes to fill, literally, but I think he has done a good job this fall and will rise to the challenge.
Not sure who the 3 is.
RE: UCLA -24 - U of M/ND fan - 08-31-2014 08:35 PM
(08-31-2014 07:46 PM)ItsDude Wrote: UCLA's defense looked very good yesterday....if we can move the ball on them, it will be a moral "victory" if nothing else.....why did Ifedi have to get hurt before this game??
UCLA's defensive front did look good yesterday. Our OL will be challenged that's for sure.
RE: UCLA -24 - tigerlands - 08-31-2014 09:00 PM
It will be as bad as UCLA wants it to be. We ain't play Austin Peay.